SENATORS SUSAN COLLINS AND JOE MANCHIN LIE BECAUSE THEY CAN - THEY ALSO REFUSE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN IGNORANCE

"WASHINGTON — Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., criticized the Supreme Court's ruling Friday to eliminate the constitutional right to an abortion, after they voted to confirm Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, two key votes in the decision to overturn a half-century-old precedent.

“This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon," Collins said in a statement.

She blasted the ruling as "a sudden and radical jolt to the country that will lead to political chaos, anger, and a further loss of confidence in our government."

Source NBC: 

First, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh did not lie that an egregious previous Supreme Court ruling was not subject to the protection of precedent.  The opinion which has so many people mad is based on Roe being egregious.  Why was this issue not hashed out during the confirmation hearings?  Why did not one ask if Roe would count as an egregious example of precedent?

BUT THE BIG LIE

By next week the House can have passed a codification of part of Roe.  A 15 week cut off with protections for the health of  the woman is not unreasonable.  Also no woman should be denied an abortion to abort a fetus who died in utero, even at 9 months.  There is no life being taken.  Also the ability to now abort a fetus through induced labor has changed the horror of abortion.

With these two Senators the filibuster can be bypassed and the Supreme Court will effectively be reversed.  It can all happen next week.  But Collins and Manchin lie.  They will never support bypassing the unconstitutional filibuster to protect at some parts of Roe v. Wade.

So I am sorry I am not buying their indignation.  They are liars.

THIS DEBATE REQUIRES PRAGMATISTS

In 15 weeks a woman should be able to make a decision.  This is an essential compromise.  But we must also provide for later abortions when the mother's life is compromised, or the fetus has already died in utero. 

I WILL NOT EVEN TRY AND UNDERSTAND THE TRAUMA OF BEING A RAPE VICTIM

It is not that I do not want to, it is only the victim can fully understand what she is experiencing.  Her choice is bringing an innocent baby into the world but facing that baby every day knowing he/she was the product of the most heinous violence imaginable against a woman. 

A big part of the problem is women are not being educated that she is not aborting even a one hour old fetus if she can get to emergency contractive fast enough. 

Congress needs to fund better education on this issue, to include public service announcements on TV so women know.  We need a 100% no judgment or questions policy when prescribing emergency contraceptives.  I accept there will be cases a woman's medical history may require some safety questions.

With public service announcements we need to empower woman to know she is the victim and should feel no shame over having been raped.  It is time for frank and open discussion on this issue, with all the funding needed to help these women.

Women need to be empowered with public service announcements that with emergency care, she can prevent conception.

But I understand there are some women who will not be able to make that  decision that fast.  I will not judge her, because I cannot possibly understand the trauma she suffered.

We need to be pragmatists. I am very anti abortion.  But I am not an absolutist. 15 weeks for a regular abortion is more than enough time to make the decision.  15 weeks is the  cut off which was challenged in the Mississippi case which brought an end to Roe. 

THIS IS A FEDERAL ISSUE AND NOT A STATE ISSUE - THE FETUS HAS THE RIGHT TO LIFE AND THE WOMAN HAS A RIGHT TO AUTONOMY OVER HER BODY - THIS IS A FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE 

So if Collins and Manchin are so outraged claiming to have been lied to when they were not, why not support the new House law which should be passed next week?  They just never asked the right question. 

Click for a great article on this issue of Collins and Manchin either being stupid or liars.

Source: Daily Beast

AND FOR THE RECORD, FLORIDA PER CAPITA HAS MORE ABORTIONS THAN DEMOCRATIC STATE OF CALIFORNIA

You know why, one has strong sex education and the other does not. 

What the hell, let's go all the way.  My urologist who I trust and like put me on Flomax to improve my urine flow.  I never wake up to go the bathroom.  When I had a significant side effect, I researched it and learned Flomax can prevent the prostrate from producing the very thing which protects the prostrate.

You remember the man who played Superman who had to travel to California for medical care so he could get an erection after being mostly paralyzed after falling off a horse.  It was considered obscene language for the doctor to recommend the prostrate massager which fixed the problem.

This topic is taboo.  The idea of your wife massaging your prostrate makes you gay is absurd.  No, it can actually cure ED in some cases without expensive medication. But in Texas your  doctor cannot discuss it with you.  It is considered obscene language. 

Guys you are not gay if you enjoy using a prostrate massager.  It just means you enjoy the stimulation and pleasure it gives you.  Most of them are very small and not much bigger than your finger. It is taboo so doctors are actually hurting men with unnecessary medications because it is taboo to have a frank and honest discussion about the male and female bodies. 

Women are taught how to maintain their vagina.  It is high maintenance. But men are not taught how to protect their prostate.  As it turns out the opening of my urethra is smaller than normal.  This is a part of my problem.  In states where doctors can speaking frankly they actually recommend a device which allows you to stretch the opening.  I need more time with the urologist. The kidneys are not producing urine which is why I do not vacate, but I need to let this doctor go a step at a time.  I trust him. 

Women are actually taught the importance of keeping their vagina stretched to avoid health problems.  You may call them toys, I call them medical devices. 

Flomax has done nothing for me.  But once I learned it can stop the production of the chemical the prostate produces during ejaculation which multiple studies have now shown to be beneficial to the prostrate, I immediately stopped the Flomax. 

Because of  this taboo about talking about ejaculation with your doctor, I am certain very few doctors know about the studies. 

NO I AM NOT BECOMING A SURVIVALIST, BUT IT IS TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT

There will never be a gun in my home no matter how bad it gets.  I know me, I will hesitate just long enough to get myself killed if my home is invaded.

It is not about the number of people who are prepared to go rogue, it only takes a few to cause a major insurrection.  Remember Jan. 6th and how close we came to a major civil war.

If I had to bet those wanting to defend the end of Roe will be significantly more vocal than  the pro choice people.  In reality I highly doubt abortion or gun control will impact the November elections.  

People do not care anymore about anything, except themselves. 

BUT WHAT DO I DO ABOUT THOSE VERY SMALL ROGUE GROUPS ON BOTH SIDES.

So I will study what are the basic things I need.  I think for sure an old fashion radio.  I need lots of batteries over time.  They will go bad.  I will speak with a brother about the family all agreeing on one type CB.  You cannot wait until the shelfs are empty.

I need to explore water options.  I am allergic to most processed foods, so canned products can be difficult.  I do drink the Premier Nutritional Supplement most days for lunch. I am rarely hungry after years of eating fewer than a 1000 calories a day. I could survive for months on the Premier product three times a day. I had two glasses of water for supper last night, and Premier for lunch.

Thank god with joy I can eat beans every day.  Dry products are easy to keep.

I just had a colonoscopy.  I have a great doctor for years now.  I never, ever question his advice.  I should be on a 5 tear cycle for the next one, but because I did not cleanse he put me on a three year cycle.  

The night before the cleanse I ate a bowel of yellow Jell-O.  The morning of the cleanse I ate a bowel of yellow Jell-O. I was not hungry at all while I prepared for the prep.  But I still did not cleanse properly.  The reason: there is no real way of knowing for sure.

Sorry for the side bar, but my point is I do not need a lot to eat.  Water will be the big challenge.

SO NO I AM NOT BECOMING A SURVIVALIST - BUT I WILL KEEP AN EYE ON THESE SMALL ROGUE GROUPS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM AND ACT ACCORDINGLY

 

 CAN PRESIDENT BIDEN ISSUE AN EXECUTIVE ORDER ALLOWING ALL FEDERAL MEDICAL FACILITIES TO PERFORM ABORTIONS UNDER THE ROE FRAMEWORK IN STATES WHERE ABORTION HAS BEEN BANNED? 

CORRECTION AND I TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR LISTENING TO THE NEWS

So the opinion is 4 expressly agreeing Roe is overrule, and 3 dissenting saying no.  Then Chief Justice Roberts concurred with the result, meaning he is fine with the 15 week cut off for abortions, but he did not agree with the reversing of Roe.  So now we are at 4/4 for and against Roe.

I am very exhausted, but then in another concurring opinion, the Associate Justice leaves more holes in the issue than Swiss cheese, so it is not clear.

These type plurality opinions never end well.  The lower courts will look for every reason possible for ignoring the plurality of 4 who clearly overrule Roe.

I have for a long time opposed use of the Commerce Clause to promote abortion.  I still hope for compromise, but accept that is not an option. There is now no issue women will cross state lines for abortion.  This puts the Commerce Clause into the question.

If Biden has authority to use an executive order to provide for abortion in federal facilities in states wherein abortion has now been banned, he should.  I still remain opposed to abortion, but  I know it is not a black and white issue.  I am basically a pragmatist on this issue.

See Elizabeth Warren Boston Globe

I defy the states to prosecute anyone who legally performs an abortion in a federal facility wherein they have been authorized to do so.

 I CAN FIND NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE U.S. AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA AND TRUMP GETTING  THE PEOPLE TO ENGAGE IN AN INSURRECTION - THE ABORTION COVERAGE IS ALL LIES TO GET PEOPLE TO PROTEST 

Any fool can read today's opinion and  read 5 Justices upheld Roe and only 4 overruled it.  So why is the news media reporting the opposite?  To incite protest

 MINUTES AWAY FROM POTENTIALLY VERY DEVISIVE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS- 

MIND YOU UNDER THE NEW LAW THEY NOW HAVE GREATER SECURITY, WHILE YESTERDAY THEY TOOK AWAY MY RIGHT TO FEEL SAFE IN MY HOME

SUPREME COURT RULES IN A PLURALITY OPINION ROE V. WADE IS REVERSED

Key here is the plurality opinion.  Chief Justice Roberts agreed the Mississippi rule to stop abortion at 15 weeks is constitutional, but he  did not agree to reverse Roe.  This means a majority of 5 did not overrule Roe.  This is going to be a real mess in the federal courts.  the news media on reporting cannot seem to  count to 5.

From Alito:

"(e) Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. The Court overrules those decisions and returns that authority to the people and their elected representatives. Pp. 78–79. 945 F. 3d 265, reversed and remanded."

I put 100% of this egregious opinion of Ruth Bader Ginsberg.  She was asked to retire when it was clear she would not survive the cancer to insure a Democratic President could replace her.  Ruth who believed she was some god on women's rights refused to resign.  Her ego gave the appointment to Trump and now Roe may be dead.  Some will say there is a level of poetic justice in Ginsbergs' ego cost women a qualified right to an abortion.

ON THE REAL LANGUAGE, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE ALITO LIES WHEN HE SAYS THE COURT PREVIOUSLY FOUND WOMAN HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN ABORTION - IT NEVER HAPPENED

The Court found women have a qualified right leaving the states to some regulation.  The bottom line is there are 5 votes to uphold Roe v. Wade.  A plurality of 4 is not precedent to overrule.  How long will it take the news media to get the ruling right is anyone's guess.

 The Texas Supreme Court has ruled any act by the state in violation of the Texas Bill of Rights is a legal nullity as if it never happened.  

Any violation of the Texas Bill of Right is a legal nullity as if it never happened. 

City of Beaumont v. Bouillion 

The Brownsville  Police Department and DA's office will not comply with § 30 of the Texas Bill of Rights.  It is time the court decides this issue. 

"Sec. 30.  RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS.  (a) A crime victim has the following rights:
(1)  the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process; and
(2)  the right to be reasonably protected from the accused throughout the criminal justice process.
(b)  On the request of a crime victim, the crime victim has the following rights:
(1)  the right to notification of court proceedings;"

I hate reporting on local matters, but we all know the drunk old hags will not report unless they are first paid. 

 "' I DA SAENZ WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE THE  DOMESTIC ABUSE OF WOMEN AND I DEFY THE BROWNSVILLE CHIEF OF POLICE TO TAKE THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS TO THE CRIMINAL SECTION OF THE OFFICE OF THE AG"

I have to be careful in how I report this so as not to make it worse.  The law says Saenz can be removed for any improper acts after he is elected.  It does not say since his last election.

Look CPS only hires the worst of the worst.  We have witnesses that today cps informed a mother they will take her to court for failing to do enough to end the domestic abuse of her, her children and mother.  That is some sick and emotionally disturbed CPS work. I gave her a chance to get the complete facts and she chose to not care, so now she will be handled accordingly.

The Brownsville Police have the pictures of  the injuries to the three year old which I personally saw after she told me how the father slammed the  door on her and her grandmother.  The police have the pictures of the mother's neck injury after he chocked her with an electrical cord.

The mother is on the verge of a complete break down.  What kind of sicko blames the mother when the corrupt DA Saenz refuses to act and the Police Chief runs covers for Saenz?

I am done.  I will write the $50,000 retainer to bring CPS, Saenz and the City of Brownsville into the federal lawsuit pending against CPS in Houston.  They have already been put under federal supervision once.

This is not the first round of Saenz's corruption against this victim.  I forced her into court to testify.  We met with the ADA the day before the trial.  This young mother has no confidence in the system because she filed too my domestic abuse complaints to go nowhere under first Villalobos and  then Saenz. 

She was told to show up the next morning for trial at 9 a.m., about 10 a.m. the bailiff comes out and  tells us the ADA after meeting with her the day before gave her abuser a walk.  He then went to San Antonio assaulted an elderly lady and has been in a high security unit ever since. 

This is retaliation against a family. Several months ago Gabby Garcia was poised to accept a plea bargain where the defendant was charged with burglary of a habit and charged  with felony theft.  Saenz refused to keep the victim informed as mandated by the Texas Bill of Rights.  Gabby who is as corrupt as they come, denied the plea bargain, after I made it clear I would handle her.

We then notified her through Irma Gillman who works for Gabby, the wife of the first assistant ADA Pete Gillman of a $5,000 bribe if the victim would agree to the plea bargain.

Gabby Garcia ignored the complaint and agreed to a new plea bargain with no restitution.

Saenz refused to bring a second charge after the police reported the video of the defendant jumping the fence again and robbing him again.  Not so much as a motion to revoke her bond. Saenz hates this family.  They had the defendant's debit card found at the door which is how she broke in.  On the exist video they have her drinking one of the victim's beers.

The owners of the property filed criminal trespass charges, Saenz refused to prosecute.

Under the void part of the Bill of Rights I am asking DPS to void the plea bargain because not only did Gabby Garcia refuse to keep the victim informed, she refused to refer the bribe complaint for investigation.

Gabby Garcia is as corrupt as they come.

The attorneys for Melissa Lucio have sought the recusal of Gabby Garcia and DA Saenz over the Pete Gillman connection.  I forwarded Melissa Lucio's attorneys all the documents on the other case wherein Gabby worked with Saenz to keep the victim in the dark and to take no action on the bribe claim which was received by Pete Gillman's wife Irma.

I read the Motion to recuse Saenz and Gabby on the cloud.  The file is missing from the District Clerk's online system.  The corruption will never end. 

Gabby Garcia is as corrupt as they come.

This abuse of this emotionally disabled women is going to end and I am willing to use $50,000 of my money to help it along.

THE CASE OF LUIS AND DELIA SAENZ' DAUGHTER IN LAW WHO WAS CHARGED WITH POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE AND ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF A GUN HAS GONE MISSING.  HER ATTORNEY IS RENE DE COSS WHO WAS RUSHED TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ON THE NIGHT OF THE ARREST TO SECURE A PR BOND

I am forwarding all the documents to the FBI and DPS to determine what happened to the case.  If it was transferred to  the criminal section of the office of the AG because no other DA would take the case, the file should still be there with a notation transferred to the office of the AG for prosecution

" I DELIA SAENZ STAND BY MY HUSBAND IN ALL HIS CORRUPTION AND SUPPORT OF THE ABUSE OF WOMRN.  I MAYSELF MAY BE A VICTIM OF GASLIGHTING BY LUIS SAENZ." 

 THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY MESS IS PARTLY THEIR FAULT AND ON THE OBAMA, TRUMP AND BIDEN ADMINISTRATONS

Here are the facts, COVID is going up again real fast.  The B4 and B5 variants of Omicron are not responding to  the vaccine or boosters.  I know 4 people in Brownsville with Covid.  Yes, it is just a real bad flue for them, but they are out of  work and isolated from their loved ones. 

The airlines have finally admitted part of the personnel shortage is the number of employees out with COVID.  You wanted to end the masks in the airport and on planes so no you can sleep in the airport waiting for a flight.  It is what you wanted, and it is what you got.

THE OTHER BIG PROBLEM GOES BACK TO OBAMA, THEN TRUMP AND NOW BIDEN

My brother retired about 5 years ago as an air traffic controller.  Federal law mandates you retire at 55.  Because of the shortage of controllers they extended him to 56.

The union has been warning one administration after another the shortage of controllers is going create a crisis.  Well the crisis is here.  The news media had no interest in the union warnings.  Now they sit in airports unable to get flights.

The entry test is very difficult.  The pay during the training period in Oklahoma is really nothing.  So you better have a spouse who can support the family or be able to live with your parents.

You do not just graduate the program and go to work.  You then spend years like in a medical residency working for nearly nothing to complete the training at a center. You may not be assigned to a center near your spouse or parents, and then you really have no place to live, or have to find roommates.

Once you are fully trained and if you work hard promotions come along with amazing money.  But you have to pay your dues.  Today no one wants to pay their dues.  They just want the big money.

Since Obama nothing has been done to upgrade the system used by the controllers and there has been no mass recruiting program.  If you do not have controllers to work the centers you cannot fly planes.

So there you have it between incompetence of the airlines dropping the mask requirement and the government allowing for a major shortage of controllers, YOUR FLIGHT HAS BEEN CANCELLED. 

 IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET BACK TO THESE DAYS OF CIVILITY

 SO FAR WE ARE GETTING MIXED RESULTS FROM THE SUPREME COURT WITH CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS ACTING AS THE SWING VOTE - THE FIRST TWO OPINIONS ARE NONDISCRIPT 

UPDATE:  SUPREME COURT JUST ANNOUNCED MORE OPINIONS WILL ISSUE TOMORROW AT 9A.M. OUR TIME - IT IS AN INDICTMENT ON THE COURT HOW MUCH MONEY IS BEING SPENT FOR SECURITY AROUND THE COURT OVER THE IMPENDING ABORTION DECISION - YOU CANNOT HAVE A REPUBLICA WHEN FEDERAL SECURITY HAS TO PROTECT THE COURT AT AN UNPRECEDENTED LEVEL

AFTER 100 YEARS OF PASSING SUPREME COURT REVIEW, TODAY THE SUPREME COURT RULED NY'S LAW REQUIRING A LICENSE TO CARRY A WEAPON IN PUBLIC IS UNCONTITUTIONAL

I repeat my right to life trumps your right to own any guns. How the Democrats seem unable to articulate such a simple concept is lost on me. It is lost on no one the Democrats just pushed for more security for the Supreme Court and the President signed it into law.  So these guys get more security and we get less.

Associate Justice Thomas commands states look to what the Founding Fathers understood at the time the Second Amendment was written.  Every founding father knew of Blackstone's summaries of  the law at the time. Blackstone recognized the balancing issue.

Now when you read this if it appears toe be a small "f" try reading it as an "s."  Language changes.

"The RIGHTS OF PERSONS.

BOOK I.

Ch. 1.

man from doing mifchief to his fellow citizens, though it diminifhes the natural, increafes the civil liberty of mankind : but every wanton and caufelefs reftraint of the will of the fubject, whether practiced by a monarch, a nobility, or a popular affembly, is a degree of tyranny. Nay, that even laws themfelves, whether made with or without our confent, if they regulate and conftrain our conduct in matters of mere indifference, without any good end in view, are laws deftructive of liberty : whereas if any public advantage can arife from obferving fuch precepts, the control of our private inclinations, in one or two particular points, will conduce to preferve our general freedom in others of more importance ; by fupporting that ftate, of fociety, which alone can fecure our independence. "

Source: 

You get it, if the law has no real purpose it has no basis, but if the law invades are natural right for a more secure society and enhancement of our liberty, then it is constitutional.  Justice Thomas knowns Blacksone, but he just does not respect the common law at the time the Founding Fathers wrote the constitution.  This is simple the well respected notion of Ordered Liberty. 

NY has promised to move fast to effectively overrule the Supreme Court.  Justice Thomas left enough loopholes in the opinion for NY to rewrite the law to effectively stop the carrying of weapons in public. Also the concurring opinions left even more holes in the opinion.  There is no clear opinion.

The issue was over the permit process and the need to show a real reason for self defense.  Well given how many mass shootings we have had I think a rational person should be able to argue self defense.  But there were mandates to get a gun to carry in public without a permit

Nonetheless NY is free to immediately reenact  this law with guidelines which better comport with historical rules applied in the country.  But for now in Times Square anyone with an AR 15 can walk around without a permit.

The first case this morning is about voter ID, sort of.  It is a nondescript case. After a controversial veto of the new law, which the Legislature overturned, the NAACP to stop the law sued.  I have never hidden the fact  I support voter ID so long as the state has rational laws of what counts as a valid ID, the state has worked hard to insure everyone can get an ID.

The case actually had nothing to do with voter ID.  The issue is can the legislature ask to intervene in the lawsuit if they believe they can do a better job defending their laws than the State.  The Court said yes, while he appellate court said no.  I think they got this.  Whether  I like the Texas Legislature or not, they along with all legislatures should be allowed to defend constitutional challenges to their laws.  Whether I like it or not they are the ones the people elected to represent their interests. 

In an another nondescript opinion the Court ruled a prisoner can ask for any form of execution used in any state which may be less painful than the one used in the state where they face the death penalty. Chief Justice Roberts was a swing vote.

For years this has been the law as to the state, but now it has been extended to the process used by other states if it is less painful.

The state is responsible 100% for delaying this inmates execution.  All they had to do was agree to the form of execution of his choice and he would already be dead and buried.

This is just another example of  the state keeping these cases alive for no apparent reason.

MIRANDA TAKES ANOTHER HIT, WHILE THE POLICE GET MORE RIGHTS

We all know Miranda "you have the right to remain silent -  etc."  For years the Supreme Court has weakened Miranda over and over again.  The current rules make it just too easy for the police to ignore Miranda because there is no accountability.

The defendant was tried, and found not guilty.  Congress pursuant to its powers under the Fourteenth Amendment  allow people to sue state officials for violating their rights whether a state law or the constitution.  There is nothing in the plain language, exempting out any rights. [ a term the conservatives love to use unless they do not like the result.]

This opinion for its final reasoning proves the fake Conservatives on the Court just make things up to fit  their agenda.

In the first of two trials the trial court ruled that failure to give him his Miranda rights and then sign a confession of apology found because he was not under arrest at the time, just interrogation, the police had not duty to issue a Miranda warning.

The initial trial ended in a mistrial.  In the second case the judge again refused  to allow the jury to know the defendant's Miranda's rights were violated.  The jury found him not guilty.

Then under the federal law he sued that failure to give him his Miranda rights violated his constitutional rights.  Not even the Supreme Court  challenged the right to a Miranda warning is a constitutional guarantee.

HERE IS THE BS RULING

They found it does not serve judicial economy for a federal judge or jury to reconsider whether the state court should have informed the jury of the failure of his Miranda rights and therefor his letter of apology was inadmissible.  

On a regular basis the federal courts review state criminal proceedings and reverse the state.  What is the difference?

Congress knows what it is saying.  Nowhere in the § 1983 law does it say some federal rights and state rights are exempted from  enforcement under the law.  § 1983 law is difficult because the Supreme Court and appellate courts keep on ruling Congress never intended a remedy for a particular of federal or state law which was violated.

Congress was clear, if under the color  your rights are violated you can sue.  How do you interpret this to mean what Congress meant or did not mean?.  The language is so plain. No constitutional right,  federal right or state right was exempted under the law.

The decision of the Supreme Court to use judicial efficiency as an excuse to not allow for the suit is pure BS because federal judges already do this.

In fact the Supreme Court every term reverses state Supreme Court proceedings to include misapplication of state law.  So what is the difference?

Miranda is our main defense against against a recalcitrant police officer of DA, and with every term the Supreme Court weakens it, while making it more and more difficult to sue or hold the police accountable for violating our rights.

 I KNOW OF NO ONE WHO CLAIMS TO BE A REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTRY - POLITICIANS  DO NOT COUNT - THE PEOPLE ARE DONE

I agree with former President Obama that a federal fuel tax holiday is a gimmick, [2008] so I am on board with any Democrat or Republican who opposes President Biden's proposal on this issue.  Let's put this into numbers.  At 18 cents a gallon, if you have a 20 gallon tank, that is a savings of $3.60 every time you fill an empty tank.

So for that $3.60 are you prepared for the federal budget to lose potentially over a billion dollars used to maintain the Interstate Highway system or other federal highways?  They are just going to get the money from you another way.

I can honestly say I have not been able to verify if the law Nixon used to freeze all pricing is still on the books.  But he had the authority and brought inflation under control.

AN  EXAMPLE OF A GEOLOGICAL FAULT WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS VICENTE GONZALES OPPOSING BIDEN ON PRESSURING THE OIL INDUSTRY TO INCREASE PRODUCTION

Well he lost my vote.  With Myra Flores at least I know my enemy.  Vicente obviously prefers the oil company's support over the needs of the people.  Now had he called out the tax holiday as a gimmick I would have been with him all the way.

Elected Democrats all over the country seem uneasy about a tax holiday, and the oil industry is giving too much money to get their votes.  This is a geological fault which cannot be repaired.

TEXAS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS FALLING APART - THE PLATFORM POLICY OF PUTTING SECESSION ON THE BALLOT IN 2023, IS JUST BIZARRE

Loyal Republican members who support this platform are just too ignorant to participate in government.  This is a geological fault which could damage the Republican Party of Texas and nationally.  How can the national Republican Party not denounce this level of unpatriotic conduct by Texas Republicans?

Where is the King of federal bailouts, Greg Abbott going to go to after the next disaster?  The lemming Republicans who support this nonsense will be caught with the bill, because the Texas government will never ever raise taxes on corporation.

I can almost hear the sucking sound of corporations leaving the state if this makes it on the ballot in 2023.  

Also watch how fast the government closes military basis.  Watch how fast they pull military production contracts if Texas is a separate country not wanting to be part of the U.S.

As to all you veterans who think  this is not nonsense, the U.S. government cannot pay for and support veteran medical care facilities in foreign countries. You can still get your social security, but I am not sure about Medicare. 

Is there any  actual function of your brain working when you get behind this craziness.

TEXAS AND NATIOANALLY THE GEOLOGICAL FAULT IS GETTING WORST

Locally Carlos Cascos has distanced himself from the Republican Party Platform.  He has made very clear statements against secession, the anti-gay language, disrespect for veterans who have served this country and many of  the key provisions of the Texas Republican Party Platform. 

At this time true old fashion Republicans will vote for him, and rational Independents so long as he keeps on distancing himself from the craziness of the Texas and National Republican Party will vote for him.

TRUMP CONTINUES TO GET MIX RESULTS

Last night both of Trumps candidates in  Georgia runoff for congress lost.  But his candidate for the U.S. Senate in Alabama won.  But it is not lost on anyone, he changed his endorsement after polling showed the first person he endorsed could not win.

This is yet another geological fault. 

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE DONE WITH BOTH PARTIES AND NOVEMBER IS NOW ANYONE'S GUESS

 I KNOW THIS IS LOCAL, BUT I HATE HOW  THE TROLLS BAD MOUTH DOWNTOWN - I STOLE THIS  FROM MCCHALE

This is what  downtown Brownsville is becoming.  Once you get this kind of housing, I have seen it in Dallas and Fort Worth, the people with money move to downtown.  To whomever bult this thanks for believing in downtown.

It is a shame I am a big space place, because I could enjoy living in a place like this and living the downtown life.

My new place is several acres, but only about 1/4 acre of buildable space.  It is all boulders and canyons so the land is cheap.  Until the new house is built, the trailer works.  I love the space of the land, but not the trailer.