Tuesday, July 9, 2019


WHY IS NO ONE RUNNING IN THE 2020 PRIMARIES AGAINST SAENZ?

Over the months I have been given several names to only learn later they have changed their minds.  What is going on?  We need to investigate.

THE BATTLE MUST BE FROM BOTH THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH TO LOCK HIM IN

A separate entity needs to be formed to create a web page, with a mailer directing voters to the web page, and possible ads. This entity needs a name such as "Defeat Saenz" without endorsing any opponent. Their sole purpose is to raise the money to do as I outlined above and educate the electorate.

The other side of attack has to be highly qualified Democrats and Republicans running their own campaigns.  Only those with money will move forward, but the "Defeat Saenz" entity will help the most qualified candidate to beat Saenz in the primary, and elevate a highly qualified Republican for the November election.

I will personally vote for a highly qualified serious Republican before I vote for Saenz.  The "Defeat Saenz" entity has to make clear they are endorsing no candidate and only educating people about the truth concerning Saenz.  This allows their entity to continue if for some reason Saenz wins the primary.  They cannot stop their battle because it may mean delivering the seat to a Republican.  There sole focus must be "Defeat Saenz."  

Last time around the Defeat Saenz people backed Masso.  That was the problem.  Masso cannot win.  He will never overcome the Bridge to Nowhere mess at the Port.  The Defeat Saenz entity must only focus on defeating Saenz and then allow the candidates to work it out among themselves.  A highly qualified Democrat should be able to beat Saenz if the people are being inundated with the truth about Saenz.  If Saenz wins the primary the "Defeat Saenz" entity can continue to educate the people and maybe just be a highly qualified Republican can win.

It is up to all of the people who want Saenz gone.  Can you focus just on that mission and not get involved in backing any candidate?  That was the mistake last time and cannot be the mistake this time. 

No comments: