Saturday, March 30, 2019


SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT

Our diversity is becoming a bigger and bigger issue.  In the end we are all U.S. Americans, but with our very distinct backgrounds.

I love AOC as a congresswoman because a year ago she was selling tacos and is now a member of the House of Representatives.  She came from the trenches.  Pelosi has lived a life or privilege for so long she knows nothing about the trenches. 

Not all Latinos are the same.  AOC brings a distinct voice to Congress. 

We need to learn and defend we are all from different sub-groups which are part of this great mosaic we call our country.

Friday, March 29, 2019


TONY MARTINEZ IS RUNNING HIS CAMPAIGN CALL CENTER IN SAN ANTONIO

Do us all a favor and file a protest by calling 210-399-5330, and demand you number be taken off his call list.  Send the message - JOBS FOR BROWNSVILLE NOT SAN ANTONIO


NOW I GET IT

Tony had to hire people in San Antonio because in Brownsville the callers all would have bad mouthed him.

Thursday, March 28, 2019



MARIA GOVEA HERNANDEZ'S SON DEPOSITION - THERE WERE  TWO BODIES

No jury would believe a word from this man.  Listen how he says he does not know if his mother had a cell phone and then admits she called him on the cell phone.

Beyond there being two bodies, the other allegedly shot in the head, nothing is clear because this guy cannot get the story straight.

Simple question, why did law enforcement and the DA keep out of the press there were two bodies?

I will admit it is not clear by his confusing and changing testimony if they were together, or found separately.  All I know is this guys testimony is very contrived.  The new BPD Chief Saucedo better get on this ASAP demanding FBI help.

BROWNSVILLE POLICE CHIEF FINALIST LT FELIX SAUCEDO PERSONALLY PROMISES RALPH TIPTON A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO HIS WIFE'S MURDER AND COVER-UP

NOTICE TO ERIC GARZAMINE AND RALPH TIPTON'S PRINTED ONLINE DOCKET SHEETS ARE DATED:  GO AHEAD AND DELETE I DARE YOU.  THE DOJ GOT THE DATED DOCKET SHEETS THIS MORNING.  IF YOU NOW TAKE IT DOWN YOU WILL BE CHARGED WITH DESTROYING EVIDENCE

Just an insignificant lie by DA Saenz concerning the record which also goes to Eric Garza withholding records.  You read where Saenz's office says the Maria Govia Hernandez case was expunged.  This is a lie.  Below you see just one page of the online docket sheet which would not be there had the record been expunged.  I just printed it.



I have the entire docket sheet which shows motions and orders missing.  There is no record of a trial - peroid.  The Herald reports the jury found the defendant not guilty.  Why does the Eric Garza's office not have this in the record?  See Herald   Why does the last page just show the the dismissal of the case, but no record of the trial?

The police also destroyed Mary Tipton's personal effects after the DA sent a letter to release her personal effects to Ralph Tipton.  Allegedly a police officer claims the DA's office called later and told the BPD to destroy Mary Tipton's personal effects.  LT Feliz Saucedo has guaranteed Ralph Tipton a complete investigation into everyone in the case.



NEWSFLASH

I am waiting on a new video which will blow this out of the water.  Until I see the video and can post I am not going to reveal the allegation.



RALPH TIPTON FORMALLY FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WITH DOJ CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION IN WASHINGTON AGAINST DISTRICT CLERK ERIC GARZA

I have no knowledge if the claim is good.  If the DOJ pursues the investigation you can bet  I will use it in the case I am consulting on against Eric Garza for the same thing.  I know for a fact the records are not secure under Eric Garza.  With every day the county does not take control of his office, their liability goes up for more missing records.

The woman who got off for the murder of Mary Tipton, got off because visiting Judge Bañales gave a bad spoliation instruction. " A spoliation instruction is an instruction given to the jury outlining permissible inferences they may make against a party who has lost, altered, or destroyed evidence. Brewer v. Dowling, 862 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex. App. – Fort Worth 1993), writ denied. A party who has deliberately destroyed evidence is presumed to have done so because the evidence was unfavorable to its case."

What inference could have been made, that she did not hit the woman and then failed  to immediately call law enforcement?  No and that was the only legal issue as to her innocence or guilt.  Remember lawyers, there are unlimited objections to Judge Bañales sitting as a visiting judge.  It does not matter he is a senior judge, he lost his last election and that is the key to the law.

If you remember the detective destroyed much of the tape which showed the woman's family searching the area where she believed she hit something or someone - hence spoliation.  Detective Clipper had already had other civil right complaints filed against him to include threatening to arrest a senior citizen if he did not pay an alleged debt he disputed.  Naturally the BPD Chief turned a blind eye to the complaint and Saenz refused to act on it.

" Before a spoliation instruction can be submitted to a jury, the court must determine:
  1. whether there was a duty to preserve evidence;
  2. whether the alleged spoliator breached that duty, either negligently or intentionally; and
  3. whether spoliation prejudiced the non-spoliator’s ability to present its case or defense.
In evaluating prejudice, the court should take into consideration the relevance of the evidence, whether other evidence is available, and whether the evidence supported the key issues in the case."
The above is the key to why the spoliation instruction was wrong - which in turn is why the jury found the woman not guilty.  The evidence was her family searching the area for what ever she hit.  So the question is prejudice.  There was none.  She was free to call to the witness stand everyone who aided in search of what ever or who ever she hit.  Also even if the tape had not been destroyed, nothing changes the fact it was a hit and run.  After the accident it was established she called everyone and their brother George but not the police.  That my friends is the key to a hit and run.
Because the woman's son was a deputy Saenz ran cover for her.  It is not the first case Saenz has run cover for a woman killed in an accident.  See to the left the case of Maria Fidela Garza.
If Ralph catches the attention of the DOJ they may see the larger criminal enterprise of Luis Saenz, and the criminal charges can go back through his entire  term case by case.
Unlike the leeches who want me to do all the work and spend all of the money to take down Mike Hernandez, Ralph Tipton remains solid in bringing to justice the woman who killed his wife and those who aided in the cover up.  Perhaps Eric Garza will be the first to be indicted.
Ralph Tipton is not a bystander, he is taking action for justice.

Wednesday, March 27, 2019


MONTOYA AND HIS TROLLS "SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE JUDGE"

All Montoya does is demand someone should file a complaint against any given judge.  And his troll readers always post the same thing.  We all know as to Elia Cornejo Lopez, unless someone pays Montoya a lot of money he will never file on her although he is demanding someone should.  This is assuming he could ever find his gonads with the Hubble Telescope.

Like I said I would have bet my gonads [reminder note - both men and women have gonads so I use the word so as not to suggest testicles are better than overies when it comes to fighting a battle] I had zero chance of getting the DOJ to authorize me to sue the dishonorable Susan McCoy who violated my civil rights while running cover for Mike Hernandez and Carlos Marin.  But I fight anyway and never say "someone should do something."  And in Susan McCoy's case I won.  Hopefully the press will pick up on it and other attorneys will find their gonads and do the same against other judges.  For the same act the Commission on Judicial Conduct found no wrongdoing the DOJ found enough evidence to raise a fact question for the court.

ON THE MONEY

Yes there have been offers to pay my fees and then some to fight Mike Hernandez and fight for my brother.  But the offers have come from candidates, elected officials, and even retired judges.  For obvious reasons I had to turn them down.  But these leeches who want to take Mike Hernandez down who cannot come up with at least $100.00 disgust me.  They are as guilty as Mike Hernandez.  They can travel the world and then claim poverty when you ask them to help.  In reality they are worse than Mike Hernandez because they are  turning a blind eye to what is happening.  The lawsuit is coming along.  I'm almost done, I just two ahead of it before Friday.  I will do my best.  I have drafts of all three, so now I have to write my Response to any Motion to Dismiss to insure I am not missing anything.

I have someone coming over to see what I can sell on EBay.  Like my brother sometimes I will have two and three things of the same tools for no other reason I like tools. So I will just have to live with one of each.

This battle is for the Constitution and not me or my brother.  If I can find an honest federal judge, I can open the door to destroying the corrupt state judges and the State Bar who protect the criminal attorneys and the Commission on Judicial Conduct which protects the corrupt judges.

For the record, all three include the State Bar and Commission on Judicial Conduct as criminal enterprises.  I have a ton of evidence against both they are covering for attorneys and judges engaged in criminal conduct thereby actively abolishing the Constitutional right to redress.

You can bet the farm Montoya will be on the attack, unless it is true Hernandez has him tied down to remain silent.


Tuesday, March 26, 2019


BREAKING STORY TO HIT LATER TODAY ON JESSICA CATA BATTLE


DID CATA BLOW IT BY RELEASING MY CONFIDENTIAL MESSAGING TO HER TO MONTOYA?

The fact she uses Montoya for anything makes her look stupid.  Montoya knows nothing about litigation or strategy.  Through a trusted third party I also seny essential information to her attorney David Willis.

I'm done - I tried to help her but she is just too stupid to be helped.  She blew it by going to Montoya about the campaign ads possibility.  Montoya's story will be used against Cata. It just sickens me.

She wants Montoya to destroy her, fine, she can take any further action to him so he can screw her over.  I'm done.  I am certain her attorney is not a happy camper.

Monday, March 25, 2019



DOJ TODAY NOTIFIED ME I AM FREE TO MOVE FORWARD ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DISHONORABLE SUSAN MCCOY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CASE MIKE HERNANDEZ HAS AGAINST ME

NOTE:  THIS IS LIKE MY 5TH TIME EDITING THIS POST FOR THE SAME PROBLEM. My cognitive skills are getting worse and the neurological damage has spread throughout my legs, and now shoulders and left hand.  The odds are about this time next week I will be experiencing improvement.  The wait is very taxing.  

The timing could not be better.  Not to be crude, but because I know the system, I would have bet my gonads I had no chance of getting such an authorization.  This is a first for me.  There are maybe 10 cases nationally on this issue.

This case will test whether our federal judges are corrupt and will protect their fellow judges.

Carlos Marin now takes on the spot of the dumbest person in Cameron County.  He is clueless how Mike Hernandez and his lawyer threw Susan McCoy under the bus, and how Mike Hernandez will throw Carlos Marin under the bus.

So long has Mike Hernandez has not been approved by the full Texas Senate as an Texas AM Trustee by Wednesday his nomination will be dead upon the right people seeing the lawsuit and the DOJ letter.

Just remember Carlos I gave you an easy out which would have actually helped your reputation.

Guys I need the money.

I'm going to bankrupt you Jessica and everyone else who has been working with Mike Hernandez.  You each have 24 hours to email the BV distancing yourself from Mike or face the consequences..

bobbywc58@yahoo.com

Carlos I recommend you hire LeClairRyan right away to get you out of this before Wednesday.  They will give you solid legal advice..


THE FEDERAL LAWSUIT TO BE FILED AGAINST MIKE HERNANDEZ, CARLOS MARIN, D & M LEASING, AND AMBIOTEC WILL BE READY WEDNESDAY

I only have like 15 minutes at a time I can focus,  So things are slow.  But the Supreme Court has ruled Mike and Carlos can be sued for corrupting the courts.  The judge can be sued for declaratory relief only, but not damages.  I will include damages against the judges, but inform the court that immunity requires that part of the lawsuit be dismissed.  I have written a good 20 pages on the history of judicial immunity and am prepared to agree the trial  court and court of appeals must dismiss the request for damages, but then if a miracle happens challenge the doctrine at the Supreme Court level.  I can show the judge made law is totally unsupported by the history of this country and its Founding Fathers.  Like Justice Jackson said. I see no reason why I should be consciously wrong today because I was unconsciously wrong yesterday."
 

I can write several pages wherein the Supreme Court used this doctrine to reverse itself.  The best known is Plessy v. Ferguson, separate but equal is constitution then came Brown v. the Board of Education  "separate but equal is inherently unconstitutional." It has reach the point judges believe they can never be held accountable and by same the immunity doctrine has abolished the right to redress.  A judicial made doctrine does not trump the constitution.  I am not suggesting judges be held accountable financially the same as in a regular case.  I am suggesting a higher standard before liability exists and that the trial judge must decide if the pleadings on their face support the high standard or dismiss the damages part of the lawsuit.  The plaintiff should be allowed to file the record which supports their claim.

"These concerns are not insubstantial, either for the judge or for the public, but we agree with the Court of Appeals that the potential harm to the public from denying immunity to private co-conspirators [449 U.S. 24, 32]   is outweighed by the benefits of providing a remedy against those private persons who participate in subverting the judicial process and in so doing inflict injury on other persons."  Dennis v. Sparks.  449 U.S. 24 (1980).

I gave Carlos a way out, but what ever he is after in running this con job with Mike must be worth a lot.  It was an easy out and Carlos made it clear, hell no.

THE ISSUE

I can tell you since my threat no one is sending me emails to go after Mike.  They fear I will call them out as leeches.  Guys I cannot take money from any elected official or anyone running from office.

But I have had far too many people who I know want Mike destroyed tell me they are broke while driving $60,000 cars and living in $500,000 homes.  Sorry guys, all you leeches want if for someone else to do the work so you can pick up the pieces and gain for yourself.

I am not playing.  

For now, $700 will get me into court along with service and citation.  I do not a lot more to keep things going and refund myself for the money I have already spent.  I am not working.  My legal work right now with only 51 minutes sessions limits me to very little work.

If you want Mike and Carlos to own Brownsville then do nothing and stop bitching.

I have a lot to do before April 7th when I head to SA.  I am tired of using my retirement money to help these leeches just waiting to pick up the pieces.  



VERIFIED ON SNOOPS AS ACCURATE




CATA PRESAS GARCIA NEEDS TO SEEK AN IMMEDIATE INJUNCTION AGAINST JESSICA TETREAU KALIFA, ELIA CORNEJO LOPEZ AND HER HUSBAND FROM USING OR DISTRIBUTING THE VIDEO THEY TOOK OF THE INJUNCTION HEARING

I have been at this for 30 years and have never seen anyone be allowed to take pictures of have cameras in the courtroom without filing a Motion for Leave first and the judge giving them permission to take pictures, recordings or videos.

Upon careful review of all the pleadings no such motion was filed.  This appears to be a sua sponte act by Elia Cornejo Lopez working with the Jessica Tetreau and her handlers.  To know Judge Robert Pate is to know he would never have discussed this matter with Elia in chambers. Now if they asked the bailiff to ask the judge without a motion, that would be illegal.  It would be an ex parte with the judge thereby denying Cata Presas-Garcia the right to object based on the fact the video was taken to use as a weapon in the campaign.

HERE IS THE BASIC PROBLEM

Without an injunction for the impermissible filming of the proceedings Jessica can edit the proceedings to paint a false and misleading picture such as she did on the Castro podcast.  I lost count on how many lies she told about the hearing, and she was never challenged.

Nothing prevents Jessica, without an injunction. from using the video to manipulate the election.  Now if Cata cannot get an injunction fast enough, Judge Pate can certainly hold Jessica, Elia and her husband Leo in contempt for an impermissible filming of the proceedings.

The better action is for Cata to act today.

THE POD CAST

If Jessica spoke she lied.  First no one testified that they were signing a sheet to get road repairs. This was a down right lie.  Now some were told if they signed the petition Cata Presas-Garcia would work harder on the road problems - big difference.

Side note - I have spoken with many of the candidates and they appear unaware there is a Director of Public works who is not an engineer and just a high school graduate.  They all complain we need more tax money for the roads versus replacing the Director of Public Works with an engineer who will bring modern technology to the process and save the city money thereby making more road repairs possible.  One candidate did not even know the city has a number to call for services.  On this issue all of the candidates fail.  This has become a sacred cow issue, and we all know how I feel about that.

JESSICA LIES MORE

One witness and only one witness testified that Presas-Garcia name was not on the paper she signed.  She also testified she forged her husband's signature.  Now on that same page number of all the sheets every other person testified their intent was to support Cata, and that Cata's name was on top of the sheet of paper.  So who do you believe if you are a judge, the woman who forged her husband's signature, or all the other signatories on the page.  Jessica says you believe the woman who admitted to forgery and dismiss the testimony of everyone else who refuted her testimony that Cata's name was not on page.

Jessica does not tell you Presas-Garcia's counsel had witnesses ready to testify that Jessica committed fraud in the collection of her signatures.  They were not allowed to testify because Jessica failed to meet her burden and the case ended when she rested her case.

THE BIG ONE

Jessica fails to mention Judge Pate cited the statute which barred him from removing someone from the ballot based on technical mistakes on the ballot access sheets.  The only fraud presented was one woman admitting to forgery, and possibly lying about whether Cata's name was on top of the list.

FINALLY

Cata get into court now and get an immediate TRO against Jessica, Elia and Leo from distributing the tape or posting it on the internet.  They will manipulate it to kill your campaign Cata.

I can easily see Judge Pate holding the three of  them in contempt for not seeking his permission to film the proceedings.


Sunday, March 24, 2019


THIS IS AN EVERYTHING POST FROM MY HEALTH, JERRY MCHALE'S LIES, AND A VERY INNOCENT MISTAKE BY JIM BARTON

MY HEALTH Well the initial procedure to drain about an ounce and a half of brain fluid was to test to see if the shunting would work.  But it was short term.  My vision is going fast. my typing requires a lot of proofing, my walking is difficult, I wobble when I walk, and my cognitive skills are failing.  Two weeks from today my nephew will drive me  to SA for a Monday morning check in at 5 a.m. at Methodist Stone Oak on Sonterra. I should be there two days.  My restrictions will include no computer use for a week or two, no driving, but as much walking as possible.  And on and on and on.  Trust me when I wake up and have my first visitor they will take a picture of the incision and post it to my FB page.  With a real Frankenstein scar on my head, I will be Frankenstein this year for Halloween.  I might as well make the best use of the scar. 

JERRY MCHALE'S LIES AND THE REASON WHY:

McHale posted the following lie.  "On a different note, Bobby Wightman-Cervantes' application to join STIJA was rejected. The vote was unanimous."

First I submitted no application.  Second there is no such thing as the STIJA, and there are no real polls.  Everything is in McHale's own head.  It is funny how McHale attacks Montoya  for failing to use minimum journalistic skills to defend Arambula, who McHale has attacked repeatedly and then names him the best blogger - he should have qualified it with untrue or half true stories bought and paid for like McHale's.

McHale is mad that politicos all over town are rejecting his post that Arambula was a victim in Montoya's false story concerning a letter allegedly written by Arambula attacking Nurith Galonsky.  I am consistently hearing no one believes Arambula and his failure to file a criminal complaint to protect the integrity of his office is all they need to know.  This story will continue on the BV and McHale will continue with his bought and paid for lies.

AN HONEST INNOCENT MISTAKE BY BARTON

I want to make clear there was no deception in his post or lies.  It is simple a failure to understand the process.  Trust me CNN totally messed up their handling of the Obamacare ruling because they were so anxious to say something they failed to make sure their reporter understood how the Supreme Court works.  My point is even CNN makes these same innocent mistakes.

WHAT JIM SAID

"Judge Robert Carroll Pate, who seemingly wrote his decision on the bus ride down from Corpus Christi, unhesitatingly denied the injunction on the basis of the intent of the petitioners. "

The latter part is 100% correct.  My issue is with the implication Judge Pate wrote the opinion in advance of the hearing.

In federal court, all judges have to write their own opinions.  In state court most judges allow the prevailing party to write the opinion.

A dispositive motion is one which can disposed of  on the Motions and Briefs without a hearing.  A federal judge rarely if ever holds a hearing on dispositive motions.  When George W. Bush was governor the Republican legislature passed a law which Bush vetoed which mandated the judges write their own opinions on dispositive motions.  This actually makes for better rulings.

An injunction is not a dispositive Motion.  But even in federal court a judge will have a temporary opinion ready or two based on the evidence.  It is done to give them better focus and to allow them to ignore the endless distractions the lawyers will present

All Judge Pate did was read the pleadings and research the law before the hearing.  This is what makes him a good judge, versus Judge David Sanchez who is challenged to find a law book.

In his research knowing he was sitting as a court of equity and the statute specifically said ballot access cannot be denied based on technical violations, he made sure he had that ready in a tentative opinion or notes.  

During the hearing at least twice maybe three times he asked the lawyers how many signatures were accepted by the city.  He specifically told the attorneys while pointing to a piece of paper he was noting how many signatures counted for ballot access.

My point is he was prepared in advance and that is what a good judge does.  I wish we had more of such judges in Cameron County.  He was late starting the hearing and I speculate it was because he was refining his possible rulings.

So once  Zayas finished putting on Jessica's case Judge Pate said he did not need to hear from Presas-Garcias defense because he was prepared to find Jessica failed to meet her burden and the Injunction was denied.

It was not clear from the pleadings if this was a TRO or Temporary Injunction hearing.  There is a big difference.  A judge can convert a Temporary Injunction hearing into a final hearing, while he cannot do same with a TRO.

Had Judge Pate found Presas Garcia had fewer than 100 valid signatures, then he would have gone on to the issue if 100 or 42 signature were needed.  A good judge does not get into issues which do not matter.  Once Jessica failed to meet her burden Judge Pate had no reason to get into the issue of 100 v 42 votes.

Again I want to stress there was nothing intentionally misleading by Barton.  I am certain most lay people, and even lawyers were taken aback by Judge Pate having a prepared ruling.  This is what good judges do.  Judge Pate was not there to hear all of  the distractions.  He knew based on reviewing the pleadings and learning the law, his only concern was to count the signature.  I can assure you most Cameron County judges would have turned it into an endless back and forth by the lawyers based on distractions.  Judge Pate kept it focused and did what the best judges do.  But I am certain among the many lawyers in the courtroom they were taken aback watching a very professional and studious judge in action.

Saturday, March 23, 2019


BEYOND HAVING THE VISION NEEDED TO MOVE BROWNSVILLE, TREY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO CAN PREVENT A MAJORITY OF 4

Friday, March 22, 2019


ERIC GARZA'S CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW LANDS HIM IN FEDERAL COURT

It is actually the silliest of  things, but Eric would rather destroy his career rather than admit one of his clerks messed up. The party has the email from Rick Cornejo stating the clerk who messed up is no longer there and that Rick he was overseeing fixing the problems left behind.  They were asked to simply inform the Appellate Court because of the mess left by this former clerk, the required record could not be forwarded to the Appellate Court.  Eric got aggressive and demandws the Appellant deal with county attorney Juan Gonzalez and so he will have his wish.  

We are stuck with Eric until 2022.This lawsuit will play out through the 2022 primaries with the appellate process and end Eric's career.  I can tell you every county employee who has called me to tell me they thought Juan Gonzalez was screwing them over refused my advice to seek independent counsel and when all was said and done they called me to tell me they should have taken my advice.

To add to this he is refusing  to produce the part of the appellate record which will insure reversal.  To add to this after a Motion was filed with the Court of Appeal to compel him to file the complete record, he ordered all communication halted and that he would only speak through county attorney Juan Gonzalez.  In writing Juan Gonzalez stated he would not communicate with the appellant except through court filings.  Eric Garz is refusing the payment for the record.  Juan Gonzalez refuses to state how the record is to be paid for, and the court of appeals is threatening to dismiss the appeal if the record is not paid for today.

The bad news for Eric is court after court has ruled he has no immunity unless he is acting under the order of a judge.  Records mismanagement is a major area where district clerks lose immunity.  A $250,000 damages demand is going to the Commissioners Court with the facts and documented evidence.  It so bad after accepting endless documents through efile Eric Garza is now 4 times refusing to accept the affidavit of indigence.  Well under the rules it was hand filed  today.  The excuse given by Eric Garza is totally without merit.  It is retaliation.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Eric Garza is the custodian of the record.  When he conceals the record to hide the incompetence of his staff he hurts every litigant.  No lawyer will support such a clerk in the future.  No one can trust the record coming out of Eric Garza's office.  This is why federal court has to act to insure the record is protected and Eric Garza is held accountable even if it means the federal court appointing a master to oversee Eric Garza's office.

The issue here is not by any means about one party.  It is about protecting the record of all litigants, and lawyers should consider that before funding any future campaign for Eric Garza.

MORE EVIDENCE ERIC GARZA HAS LOST CONTROL OF HIS CLERKS

Just two seek ago the following on fraud by his staff was reported.  What else is Eric Garza hiding.

"By Mark Reagan Staff Writer


Cameron County District Clerk Eric Garza announced in a press release that his office filed a complaint with the District Attorney’s Office regarding discrepancies in one of his office’s accounts.
“On Monday, March 4, 2019, our office was contacted by the Cameron County Auditor’s Department regarding some discrepancies in one of our accounts,” Garza said in a statement. “We immediately notified the County’s Legal Division and filed a complaint with the District Attorney’s Office. The District Attorney is currently conducting an investigation.”

Garza said his office took action immediately upon discovering the transactions related to the discrepancies.
Cameron County District Attorney Luis V. Saenz confirmed the investigation.
“On Monday, the district clerk’s office was alerted by the auditor’s office that they, the auditor’s office, had flagged what appeared to be improper charges to a district clerk’s account,” Saenz said. “The district clerk confirmed that the charges were indeed unauthorized and requested the DA’s office too conduct an investigation into said unauthorized charges.”


JESSICA TETREUA LOST THE BALLOT CONTEST ON THE MERITS WHILE JUDGE ROBERT PATE MAKES CLEAR HE HAD A DUTY TO PROTECT THE INTENT OF THE VOTERS.

Judge Robert Tate took the correct approach.  Normally a Plea to the Jurisdiction has to be heard with evidence first, but he denied it reserving the right to pick it up after the trial on the merits.  You see he understood his ruling would be a lot stronger if he ruled on the merits thereby making the Plea to the Jurisdiction moot.  In fact based on the testimony, using a very narrow interpretation of the statute since there were no military ballots sent out for District 2, there was no mootness issue.

The judge look to the issue of intent.  The witnesses with the exception of one, and one forged signature testified it was their intent to put Cata on the ballot.  The judge found under the election code that sitting as a court of equity he had no choice but to find Cata had enough signatures and denied Jessica's Injunction.  Now she can take a mandamus directly to the Texas Supreme Court, but I do not believe the record and ruling can come before the final deadline for local mail ballots.

THE OFFICIAL HEADLINE - JESSICA TETREAU KALIFA FAILS AT HER ATTEMPT TO SUBVERT THE WILL OF  THE PEOPLE.

It should not matter who you support, you should be happy the Judge made it clear he was not going to disenfranchise the intent of the voters. This victory belongs to the people, and Cata stood and defended our rights against Jessica and the machine backing her.

If the press does its job, Jessica just lost a lot of votes.

Thursday, March 21, 2019


UNRAVALLING THE MARTIN ARAMBULA SO CALLED FAKE LETTER

It is no great secret Montoya is paid to attack and write over the top pieces.  This is why I do not believe Martin Arambula.  Montoya had to have known he would have been called on the letter unless Martin Arambula was part of the scam.  But Montoya went over the top forcing Arambula to distance himself from the letter.

As the President of the BPUB Board he is a very high level public official.  He has a duty to the people to file a criminal charge with the police and FBI against the author for impersonating a public official.  But he will not, because in every lie there is a bit of truth.  That bit of truth Arambula does not want public so he will remain silent even thought his name and office was used to manipulate an election.  This by itself makes him unfit to be a public official.  The integrity of his office takes precedence over everything else.  This is completely lost on Arambula.  He has no respect for his office or his role as a public official.

SO HERE IS THE TRUTH - I WILL DO A GRAND JURY REFERRAL  - I HAVE HAD PEOPLE SUCCESSFULLY INDICTED BEFORE OVER THE OBJECTION OF THE DA AND I CAN IN THIS ONE.

I need the letter.  Send it to me and I will begin the process.

bobbywc58@yahoo.com  Saenz can suck an egg trying to stop me

CATA IN SUBPOENA ON CITY SECRETARY SEEKS TO EXPOSE THE UNDERBELLY OF BALLOT ACCESS VIA SIGNATURE


"4. Every application and petition(s) filed with the City of Brownsville, Texas or City Secretary, Griselda Rosas by any candidate up for election on May 4, 2019, pursuant to Resolution Number 2019-001 of the City Commission of the City of Brownsville, Texas. This request specifically seeks the application and petition(s) for candidates running for offices of Mayor, Commissioner At-Large “A”, Commissioner District 1, and Commissioner District 2;"

At Common law, if a law was not enforced long enough, the state was barred from enforcing the law.  Could this case turn on Blackstone's summary of common law?

HATS OFF TO BEN NEECE FOR MOVING THE CITY FORWARD AND THE ARAMABULA CONTROVERSY

Last week when my roommate and I went to Dodici it was actually very nice walking the 2 blocks to the restaurant.  The security cameras were easy to see, there was plenty of lighting, and the police presence was clear.

If I an find someone to drive me I think I will begin to check out all of the new places on the weekends.  It was very relaxing.

Also on the Ethics Code, Ben forced the issue with others and now we a code.  Under the new rules the dog house Jessica bought from Mike Hernandez is now an ethics violation, but not retroactive.

These are all good things for Brownsville.  If anyone knows my position of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly with my reporting it is Ben. But Ben gets it.  He has a thick skin and respects my work.  Ben knows if I get a verified story of bad, I will report it.  No sacred cows.

BUT ON THIS ONE MY HATS OFF TO BEN FOR MOVING OUR CITY FORWARD


MCHALE IS REPORTING ARAMBULA IS CLAIMING THE LETTER SENT TO MONTOYA CONCERNING NURITH GALONSKY'S SERVICE ON THE BPUB IS A FAKE LETTER

With McHale an Montoya you never know who is telling the truth.  But here is a fact, it is a felony of a third degree to impersonate a public official.

Texas Penal Code 37.11

(a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) impersonates a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official authority or to rely on his pretended official acts;  or
(2) knowingly purports to exercise any function of a public servant or of a public office, including that of a judge and court, and the position or office through which he purports to exercise a function of a public servant or public office has no lawful existence under the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.

ARAMBULA AND GALONSKY OWE IT TO THE COMMUNITY TO REPORT THE ALLEGED CRIME TO THE BPD

We the people have the right to know the words of our public officials are from them and not political operatives.  This was a very serious crime which must be punished.  Only Arambula and Galonsky have the right to file a criminal complaint.  You either care about enforcement of this law or do not.  Allowing political operatives to impersonate our public officials is a very serious crime.

Wednesday, March 20, 2019



TODAY BRAIN NEUROSURGEON CLEARED ME FOR SHUNTING
It will be between next week, and and April 12th. The availability of both the neurosurgeon and general surgeon needs to be coordinated.

 A FUNNY I left my toiletries at home, so when I got here I went to Walmart. I forgot where I parked and after about 10 minutes I saw Trey Mendez's sign on my back window of my car. Point of story, Trey Mendez's car window sign saved lost disabled vet in parking lot.

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

BROWNSVILLE HAS ETHICS CODE - CESAR DE LEON OUT AT BPUB ATTORNEY

It is not posted yet.  I am trying to figure out how to link it.  I have a copy in PDF, but do not know how to link it to this page.

Two things of note, Cesar de Leon cannot file to become the BPUB attorney for a year, and two this code of ethics has no expiration date.


BPD Police Exam Notification
An Examination will be administered on Saturday, April 27, 2019
for the position of
POLICE OFFICER for the CITY OF BROWNSVILLE.
Applicants (MALE or FEMALE) must be a minimum of 18 years of age and not be over forty-five (45) years of age. Must be able to pass the PhysicalMental and Background Investigation All applicants must be able to read and write the English language and must have a High School Diploma or G.E.D. All applicants must be eligible for future licensure by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement.
The eligibility list will be valid for one (1) year.
APPROXIMATE HOURLY RATE: $16.1490
REGISTRATION DEADLINEApplicants must register at the Office of the Civil Service at 1001 E. Elizabeth Street,
2nd Floor, BrownsvilleTX,
 no later than 5:00 P.M. on Monday, April 22, 2019. 
Applicants must register in person. (Out of town applicants may apply by maior fax,956-546-4021, with the required pertinent information.)
SPECIAL   INFORMATION:
Persons who have previouslywithin 24 months, taken the Entry Level Test,and after interviews and background investigation not accepted for the position of police officer, are not eligible to take this Entry LevelExam. Examination will begin at 9:00 A.M. at The Event Center, #1 Events Center Blvd., Brownsville, Texas. Registration: 8:00 A.M.
Study Manual "Applicant Preparation Guidemay be obtained on-line.
For more information contact:

 Bannon & Associates
11402 Hornsby
Austin, Texas 78753
For more information contact: 1·512·873-7931
  
Applicants must present a valid Driver's License or Photographic ID when registering(Upon entering the testing area, you will be required to present a valid Driver's License.)

Military Service Credit: Applicants must bring their Military DD-214 at time of registration and must have served a minimum of 180 days of active military service to qualify for the additional points. (Honorable Discharge Only TLGC Chap. 143. Sec. 143.025)

 Existing Certification Credits: Applicants when registering must bring proof of their Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE) certification formerly known as Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Education (TCLEOSEin order to qualify for the additional points, and must be in goodstanding.

No penspencilspapers, mobile phones or electric equipment of any kind will be allowed to be brought into the testing area.   (All test taking materials will be provided).

The City of Brownsville is an Equal Opportunity Affirmation Action Employer.

APPLICANTS ARRIVING AFTER 9:00 A.M. WILL NOT BE ADMITTED .

Brownsville Firemen's and Policemen'Civil Service Commission
March 14,2019

POSTED: City Hall Bulletin Board
Brownsville Police Department
For more detailed information please visit the website: 
https://www.brownsvillepd.com/job-opportunities