Wednesday, March 14, 2018


THE LAUGHING MONKEY REACTS TO ROBERT SANCHEZ'S CLAIMS ABOUT ALEX DOMINGUEZ


The above is from Sanchez - if only Alex Dominguez did not associate with convicted drunks, other criminals and a drug addict.  Yes, you can say one of my alter egos is a laughing monkey.  I was actually laughing that loud and hard.

And to balance this out, to repeat something Montoya said, which I already said and posted, but explained it a lot better, sometimes in politics people vote against what they want to do because there are enough votes  to win the issue anyway.  It is a standard form of taking cover.

This is very common in politics and since the advent of Trump the Democratic House Leadership on several occasions now have released Democrats to vote with the Republicans because they were going to lose anyway, and the released Democrats are in districts which can go Republican.  So it is very possible that TreviƱo vote no on LNG as a safe vote knowing it was going to pass anyway.

TO PROTECT DOMINGUEZ ON THE LNG ISSUE MONTOYA DISMISSES THE ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE IN FAVOR OF JOBS, AND MOSTLY LIES ABOUT TREVINO TAKING MONEY FROM LNG

Montoya: "According to  reports, [the same annoy post I rejected on no evidence after investigating] attorney Keith Uhles, of Royston Rayzor Vickery, lobbied his [meaning Uhles] firm to give him [Trevino] at least $2,500 in 2017.  Proof none and that is the tell Montoya is telling a story.  Royston Rayzor Vickery, gives in these elections every election cycle.  The idea one lawyer got the firm to give $1000 in 2016, and $1500 in 2017, based on the fact one lawyer did some work for LNG, allegedly, is beyond bizarre.  It is bizarre at so many levels, but so obviously bizarre because Royston was giving in these races at this level before anyone ever heard of LNG.

The real question is how far is Alex Dominguez willing to go in dishonesty and disinformation to win this election?  Who knows when his associates are convicted drunks, other criminals and a drug addict.  How about this truth for intellectual honesty Alex?

No comments: