Tuesday, January 16, 2018









WILL BISD BOARD OF TRUSTEES ALLOW BALTY SALAZAR TO BLOCK THEM FROM RECEIVING THE CLAIMS AND RETALIATION BY BISD AGAINST A SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD?  IF THEY DO THEY ARE ALL SUBJECT TO A LAWSUIT ON FIRST AMENDMENT CLAIMS

LEFT TO RIGHT BISD TRUSTEES:

Carlos Elizondo, Cesar Lopez, Joe Lopez, Phil Cowen, Minerva Peña, Laura Perez-Reyes, and Dr. Silvia Atkinson.  Trustees what you are doing to this child is reprehensible when it is so simple for her to get services.  The diagnostician in the school is ready to test her.  A week later we have an ARD, and we may be done with getting the child help.  But no Balzy tells you fight and cover it up and you are with him.

Unlike Balty Salazar I do my research before making dumb ass threats. This federal opinion opens all trustees to suit if they allow for the blocking of communication through their BISD email. See Case page 14 and on.

It blows my mine, he says he does not have to honor the mother's request filed in affidavit form to only communicate with me, while they then try and manipulate her out ofher child's rights, but then I must only communicate with Balty.  Once we are in court, whomever appears for BISD et al, will be the sole person I will communicate if Judge Hanen allows under Supreme Court authority for me to speak for the mother and child.

Free Speech still exists in this country.  The Board, Desesperanza, and its lawyers all seem to think we live in North Korea.  No wonder our kids are so poorly educated.

Each trustee has my email, if by 5 today they do not denounce Balty's threat to keep me from communicating with them, they will have a personal lawsuit by me alleging First Amendment violations the second I get a rejected email.  Further they will be named as conspirators in denying a special needs child her right and causing her extreme distress by denying her her perfect attendance award in retaliation for her claims.

They want to be labeled as child abusers because they are dumb enough to even consider anything said by Balty or Miguel Salinas, so be it.


7 comments:

Anonymous said...

". . . they will have a personal lawsuit by me alleging First Amendment violations the second I get a rejected email."

Really?

Anonymous said...

You are so dramatic, blimp. You want to sue for one billion just like Cornejo Lopez did. Get a job dude.

BobbyWC said...

Well monkey let me explain this to you. The goal using case law was to demonstrate to the trustees if they listen to Baltzy Salazar they would get sued. I proved to them his legal advice was bad for them. I have not been blocked, and many of the trustees have lost confidence in him. Emails are getting through. It was never about money. It was about sending a message to the trustees that Baltzy was going to sink them. Message sent, argument won. My emails are getting throught.

And monkey if you were not so adverse the facts you would know the federal clerk accidently entered the one billion dollar claim by Judge Lopez, and that in fact in her lawsuit asked for no financial damages. But we all know how research resistent you are, and we all know you do not have the money to pay for a pacer account to see the live pleadings.

How did your call go with the police. It seems no one is talking to you. Well my sources do talk with me.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

"The diagnostician in the school is ready to test her. A week later we have an ARD, and we may be done with getting the child help."

Really?

Anonymous said...

"Emails are getting through."

One would assume that if the trustee's email is listed next to their name on the school directive that any email would go through to the trustee.

Ok, so what did Joe Rodriguez say about your email or any other trustee? Give us the facts.

BobbyWC said...

yes, i sopke with her and she is ready to do the testing. i've done this before

BobbyWC said...

Joe would not give me the time of day . But one trustee did say the claims can be sustained and told zendejas to handle it