Saturday, October 21, 2017


SANCHEZ AND HERNANDEZ FORCE ME TO AMENDED MY AFFIDAVIT  FOR SANCTION BECAUSE OF MORE PROOF OF INTIMIDATION BY MIKE HERNANDEZ, OR AT LEAST FEAR ON THE PART OF ROBERT SANCHEZ.

UPDATE:  MIKE HERNANDEZ AND SANCHEZ FORCE ME TO AMEND THE AFFIDAVIT AGAIN

To help me prove my point in response to this post Sanchez says the following:

"I will do what ever Mike Hernandez asks from me for your town, our town." 

Does that include lying?  Why not just say you lied in the below text and be done with it.  You will never admit you intentionally defamed him.  We shall see how the court of appeals handles this.

Mike I am  the only blogger who warned you to stay away and ignore us.  You ignored me and got in bed with thieves and liars.  We shall see what the court of appeals think of Sanchez going crazy defending you after he defamed you.  When they order the production for in camera review of the McHale and Gutierrez settlements, they will clearly see your abuse of the courts.  They will redact necessary parts and then release them to me for response.

What I love most, you cannot shut Sanchez up without a lawsuit.  Why are you refusing to sue him for black and white defamation per se?  It is either to silence Sanchez with the threat of a lawsuit, or he has something on you.

Remember when Sanchez gets on the stand he is going to have to admit he lied in the post below or affirm it.  If he says he lied, then nothing which follows will be considered credible by the court.

And Mike he continues with his homophobia insults.  Why do you refuse to denounce him?  What does he have on you?  I know this court of appeals, and some members are going to take his homophobia personal and not fancy to your refusal to denounce it.

ORIGINAL POST


These two are total idiots.  They are only making my job easier.

Again this is what Sanchez said about his loving cousin before he feared being sued.  The BV will not tolerate the silencing of anyone.  This is Mike Hernandez's goal otherwise he would have sued Robert Sanchez for what I believe is a clear case of defamation per se.


Sanchez clearly said Mike Hernandez is a drug user and buying politicians with his money.  According to Robert Sanchez this makes Mike Hernandez number one in his book.  But then of course according to court records, it was Robert Sanchez who tested positive for illicit drugs.

DID MIKE HERNANDEZ COMMIT PERJURY AND BY SAME DID HIS ATTORNEYS SUBORN HIS PERJURY?

For criminal purposes perjury is very difficult to prove.  But for sanction purposes the standard is lower.

So on November 17, 2017, Hernandez in an email admits through Jose Angel Gutierrez I was trying to communicate with him, and he would have nothing to do with it.  This is from Mike's email. 


To Duardo Paz-Martinez Today at 10:43 AM
That is a complete falsehood. I spoke with him in the phone during the Port elections and all of a sudden he literally goes off crying about his dying veteran brother and how he could not afford his cancer treatments. After literally 10 minutes I simply asked him, “how much does he need to stay alive?” which I assumed was the reason for his conduct. Then he flips a switch the next day and posts that I was trying to pay him off to endorse a candidate, which never came out of my mouth. That’s when I texted him that I would not deal with him anymore and I haven’t. When he saw that I was talking to you, he then contacted (Jose Angel) Gutierrez in an attempt to get back in contact with me. That is not going to happen.
Thanks again.
Later in an affidavit Mike Hernandez said that before the alleged December 2, 2016, defamatory act, I never tried to contact him.  On November 17, 2016, he admitted I tried to contact him through Jose Angel Gutierrez.  This was my only option because my emails to him came back as blocked.

Mikes sworn statement.




On November 17, 2016, Mike admitted I was trying to communicate with him.  His statement I did not try and communicate with before December 2, 2016, is just false.

But Mike will pay his attorneys 10's of thousands of dollars spinning this, and then expect them to believe he is not conning the court.

Since I know Mike will not even pay a judgment without years of protracted litigation this has now become about sending a message to Brownsville.  You no longer need to fear Mike because the court has already ruled against him on his abusive conduct.

SO MIKEY, DO YOU THINK SANCHEZ's LATEST BOGUS POST OUT OF FEAR HELPED YOU OR HURT YOU?




No comments: