Monday, October 9, 2017


IT IS NOW ALL BEYOND SURREAL, CESAR DE LEON, LUIS SAENZ, RENE DE COSS, BOBBY LERMA, AND BEN NEECE

The story started as simple, and maybe even boring, but not anymore.

NEWSFLASHES

An agency which does criminal investigations outside the purview  of the DA's office has requested the Cesar De Leon tape for verification of his demands for money and contracts to protect and or help other officials.  They will refer the matter to the Texas AG if they find the evidence of wrongdoing, and DA Saenz will be removed from going near the case.

I am getting conflicting information on Luis Saenz.  I need definite proof that he was or was not in the MC court when the motion to disqualify De Leon was heard.  The investigating agency I mentioned above wants to know but needs to be able to verify same with credible witnesses.

The issue is the ongoing corruption of the process.  No rational person believes Cesar should stay in office.  But we cannot condemn him for his actions while turning a blind eye to the corrupt way his removal was handled.  Procedure is what protects our freedoms.  You either stand with procedure, or face the consequences when procedure is ignored to go after you or a family member.

Luis Saenz by signing the Petition demanding Cesar resign should have disqualified his office from the motion to remove Cesar from the MC case.  I also need to hear from the client as to whether or not she was given an option to sign a waiver so Cesar could stay has her attorney.

BOBBY LERMA

The Lerma family has worked hard to build a reputation of honorable service to the community.  This is the moment Bobby Lerma must act to protect the positive reputation his family has built, or go down with the ship to protect the corruption.

As the Chief Judge of the Municipal Courts he must call in Judge De Coss, Luis Saenz, Cesar de Leon, and Leon's client to determine the following:

WHY?

Because if his courts are being used to obstruct justice, to effectively blackmail elected officials to resign from office, and to under mind the democratic process, then Bobby Lerma needs to be the one who brings it all out.  Oh, the state is going to investigate and if they release the truth, Lerma will have destroyed single handily all the good will with the community his family has so honorably created.  If it is shown Rene De Coss was a willing participant or failed to notify the defendant she could sign a waiver, De Coss should be reported to the Commission on Judicial Conduct, and then escorted out of the building for good.

Was Saenz in the MC when the motion to remove Cesar was heard?  Did Saenz have a legal duty to remove himself from the case once he signed the Petition demanding  De Leon's resignation?  Was the defendant and De Leon told the defendant could sign a waiver?  And on and on.  Bobby Lerma, get to the truth because id the state brings the charges for the corruption in the MC's under your supervision, your career will be over and your family name destroyed for sitting on the sidelines..

BEN NEECE

Well as is always the case the typing monkey missed the big story on Neece's residence, and had the typing monkey had any real journalistic skills in the course of investigating the residence issue, he would have seen Ben Neece's live Petition to expunge his criminal record.  Now that one gets very interesting.

Let's deal with the expungement cases first.

On March 21, 2017, Ben Neece filed for expungment of two criminal charges.  The petition remains pending, with no explanation.  On its face the petition is solid.  The domestic abuse case was dismissed by [NOW PAY ATTENTION BOYS AND GIRLS] Oscar De La Fuente, as attorney pro tem..  You know the Oscar de la Fuente who got immunity for testifying against Armando Villalobos for how he and Armando manipulated cases, including domestic abuse cases.  So in the first dismissal Oscar filed a motion to dismiss based on the victim not wanting to prosecute.

The following from the Villalobos trial.  Does the con sound familiar.

11:42

They previously went over a domestic abuse case Hervery Roel, wherein the woman was stabbed - the demonstrative evidence would have proven the case without the witness.  ODLF still got a deal approved by Villalobos.  In this case the woman signed the non-prosecution affidavit out of fear of deportation.  She told police he even beat her while pregnant

You can see the pattern?

THE SECOND DISMISSAL

The initial reports involving Ben and his wife had the police reporting marijuana was found in the home.  I can assure you if the police go to your home and see marijuana in plain sight you are going down, and you are going to be drug tested.

OSCAR DE LA FUENTE - dismissed the marijuana charge on a lack of evidence.  So the police testimony about finding the marijuana was not evidence?

So on its face the Petition for Expungment is solid  except for the fact Oscar de la Fuente is the one who dismissed he charges, and in the Villalobos trial he admitted to working with Villalobos to dismiss similar charges as "favor."  Did Neece pay for the dismissals?  We all know Oscar was all too willing to take money to dismiss or get criminal cases dismissed. This is being looked at actively. 

I can assure my readers law enforcement is on this to find a link between a pay off for the dismissals since the con involved Armando Villalobos and Oscar De La Fuente.  If Ben Neece has a brain [LMFHO]  he would nonsuit his expunction request before this goes any further.  There is a reason  the judge to date on what to appears to be a black and white case has not signed the order.  It is now all being looked at with a fine tooth comb.

AH, THE RESIDENCE STORY THE TYPING MONKEY TOTALY MISSED

HAD HE DONE COMPETENT RESEARCH HE WOULD HAVE SEEN THE EXPUPUNGEMENT CASE

You know what is worse than not paying taxes, is falsely claiming a Homestead on a home by which your own admission you do not live in.  

My claim is based on what is listed on the Cameron County Tax Office web page, 


OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Account #Owner NameMailing AddressLegal Description
7789000000030000NEECE BEN R133 SALLY LN
BROWNSVILLE, TX 78526-9414
ABST 2- RESACA ACS LOT 30

And the Cameron County Appraisal District Web Page.

Name:NEECE BEN ROwner ID:125508
Mailing Address:133 SALLY LN
BROWNSVILLE, TX 78526-9414
% Ownership:100.0000000000%
Exemptions:HS

Now on the deed history for the above in 2000, it does say and wife.  But in 2009, his ex wife bought her own house, and it is Homesteaded,
#Deed DateTypeDescriptionGrantorGranteeVolumePageDeed Number
112/29/2009 12:00:00 AMSWLSPECIAL WD W/VENDOR'S LIEN
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
COOKE JACQUELINE
1662028120102604
211/3/2009 12:00:00 AMSTDSUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE'S DEED
MIRANDA KARLO ALBERTO & JESSICA MARIE
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
16466153200945897
34/28/2006 12:00:00 AMWDLWARRANTY DEED W/VENDOR'S LIEN
MONTOYA ANA LUZ
MIRANDA KARLO ALBERTO & JESSICA MARIE
125425125860
I spent over an hour looking for his divorce petition and while many documents were in the system the final divorce order was not.  No conspiracy here.  In these old files they just take the file and scan it in as one big file. If the divorce petition was not in the file at the time it would not have been scanned.  I wanted to see how the divorce petition handled the house. 

So my conclusions are based on two separate recordings by two separate taxing authorities in Cameron county. 

HOMESTEAD LAW - VERY VERY COMPLEX

The basic rule is to have a homestead you must live in the home.  You can have a temporary absence and still keep the homestead.  But I suspect 4 years is more than temporary.

People homestead their homes because of a tax discount and protection from judgments not related to the home such a as mortgage or a new roof for example.

MY QUESTION

How can Ben Neece claim this property which is outside the district he represents as his homestead where he lives for the tax and liability benefits, while according to Ben he lives downtown which then allows him to claim to live in the district he represents on the city commission?

I am asking the tax office to investigate.  I know enough when it comes to residency and holding public office the rules promote fraud on the electorate.  But I say lets make sure all is on the up and up which it may very well be.

BEN!!!!!!!!!!!

If you so choose, you can hire me for $1,000 as a temporary legal assistant consultant.  After the check clears I will show you the major malpractice in your divorce proceedings by you and your lawyer which is endangering you.  This level of malpractice only goes to prove any idiot can get a law license.  Ben if you have made the same mistake with clients, you are open to a malpractice lawsuit.  My services are not free.  Of course you can hire anyone you want and maybe they will find what endangers you or not.  I thought about outright posting the problem, but then I thought it would be negligent of me to tell people about the mistake which could personally cost you dearly, so I will not post the problem. I would not only endanger you by posting the problem, but in fact possibly many good people. It's a pickel because if I point it out massive fraud could ensue.  Yes that would make me negligent and an asshole, but it would also tell people to get their's fixed before the wrong person sees it. It will go to my grave.  It is way too dangerous of a public discussion.

No comments: