Sunday, October 22, 2017


ABRAHAM GALONSKY'S CLOWN BEN NEECE'S THREAT OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT AGAINST JESSICA TETREAU-KALIFA PERJURY




Go to minutes 1:49-1:50 for the vote.  First of all, other than Ben Neece based on the tape who do you clearly say said nay?  Clearly is the key.  If you hear it give me the second and minute, and I will ad it to this post.  In the initial vote it is clear Jessica did not vote.  But then she asks if she is disqualified from voting because she is on the GBIC Board.  Her question is ignored because Tony Martinez immediately jumps in to shut down the vote.  At the moment Jessica is waiting for an answer to her question the screen goes to the names of the candidates, with Tony speaking and closing the debate. There is a voice by someone, but Tony did not allow for an answer.  Can anyone say what that voice said and who said it.   It cannot be stated with certainty that during the time Tony prevented counsel from giving an answer and the screen went to the name of the candidates Jessica did not vote.  I am not saying she voted.  I am saying the tape is not conclusive.

Any fool can see, Tony delayed the vote and caused confusion.

From Judge Hanen in the Presas-Garcia v. BISD case from February of  this year.  See bottom of page 3 to top of page 4

"A court reporter created a transcript of the board meeting pursuant to an audio recording of the meeting. The court reporter certified that the transcript was a true and correct transcription of the audio. This transcript plus the actual audio recording were made part of this Court’s record. No party has objected to its accuracy. While the transcript may accurately reflect all of the official school business that took place during the meeting, the Court’s own comparison of the audio and transcript revealed that the transcript does not reflect everything spoken during the meeting. At times, the audio recording contains indiscernible background noises and conversations that no person could discern or transcribe. Hence, the transcript necessarily omits some of the background conversations that were voiced during the meeting. That being the case, this Court cannot hold as a matter of law that the transcript reflects each and every word spoken Case 1:14-cv-00010 Document 91 Filed in TXSD on 02/24/17 Page 3 of 13 4 at the meeting. Lopez and Pena have recognized the existence of the background noises and conversations."

See opinion

Key from the opinion:

"At times, the audio recording contains indiscernible background noises and conversations that no person could discern or transcribe. Hence, the transcript necessarily omits some of the background conversations that were voiced during the meeting"

Tony Martinez clearly kept there from being an answer to Jessica's question as to whether she could vote, and with his loud voice took control of what was being said.  We cannot say for certainty by looking at Jessica she did not then vote because the screen went to the names of the candidates after Jessica asked her question.  The evidence is therefore inconclusive as to whether she committed perjury. Ben knew this and filed the bogus criminal complaint anyway.

Based on Legislative Immunity Ben Neece would be generally immune, unless he targeted just one person and he was acting in an Administrative basis.  Since the matter was not on the agenda his threat was not part of the announced agenda.  As to criminal conduct, Jessica needs a real attorney to look at 18 USC 241 and 242.  She also needs to have competent counsel review Judge Hanen's opinion below for civil liability against Ben Neece.

For a good discussion on Legislative Immunity see Hanen's earlier opinion in the Presas-Garcia case.

See Opinion

For criminal conduct under 18 USC 241 and 242 see United States v. Lanier

AND OF COURSE AS THE CLOWN DOG IN THE GALONSKY CIRCUS NURITH GALONSKY WILL NOT RESIGN AND INSTEAD ALLOW THE CITY TO DAMAGE ITSELF TO PROTECT HER APPOINTMENT - THIS WILL NOT BRING JOBS TO BROWNSVILLE



PART TWO TOMORROW, WHO IS NURITH GALONSKY, THE CLOWN DOG IN THE GALONSKY CIRCUS

2 comments:

BobbyWC said...

You post what ever you want any where as if I care. Clowns all have dogs in their acts. End of story. So now you want to change the composition of clowns and their acts to be PC correct. Will not play on the BV. I am getting overwhelming support from elected officials on this coverage with encouragement to keep it going. It is only the filth in your mind which allows you to come to such a horrible conclusion. I will not accept such an implication against a women who has done nothing to merit such a vile name.

I have covered Jessica for her actions. She condemnded herself through her actions not me. You are free to celebrate women who have affairs. If you believe that is right, so be it. But I will bet the farm the majority stand with me on that one. In fact friends close to her have told her her actions hurt all women.

Bobby WC

BobbyWC said...

First of all, I have no idea where you got the idea my father had affairs. yes he was married 4 times. But in each case he was living in another state or country when he met his next wife. And since I never called this person a bitch, you are a liar.

Bye Bye

Bobby WC