Saturday, December 19, 2015




 
ROBERT SANCHEZ CHOOSES CONFRONTATION AND LIES OVER RECONCILIATION

The BV did not break the story of Robert Sanchez's assault charges. They first appeared in the Herald, and Castro's and Barton's social media pages. The BV held, as it always does until allegations could be verified with documents.

Before the Sanchez matter the BV became the only social media addressing Saenz complete failure concerning domestic abuse - my coverage in the beginning and as of late has been attacked by Juanito while he also went after the victims.  This is a continuing theme of the BV.
 
JUANITO CHANGES STORY AFTER REALIZING HE OUTED SANCHEZ AS HIS SOURCE

In the original post, Juanito claimed a certain person was subpoenaed to testify Sanchez wife does drug.  This does not appear anywhere in any court document.  The subpoena is there, but not the reason for the subpoena.,  Juanito changed his story to now say his source are anony's posters.  If he gets subpoenaed to court his lies will not lie.  It is sad Sanchez chose the path of going to Juanito to further flame the fire instead of taking the hint from Judge De Coss.

JUANITO CLEARLY UNDER PAYMENT LIES ABOUT THE DRUG TEST RESULTS

"He ... attained the drug tests performed on Sanchez and hints at possible cocaine use. But the test pages he posts show that the tests have come back "negative."

REALLY? Here is the page.  part one is a clip of the bottom of the page.  the last I checked the word positive means positive not negative.

 
There was no reason for the reposting of this information, other than Robert Sanchez wants confrontation.  The only one using this tragedy to make money is Juanito.

Below is the full report which the BV posted wherein Juanito claims the word positive actually says negative.  It is some magical trick by the BV.

 
JUANITO LIES AND CLAIMS SANCHEZ'S WIFE IS FEEDING TH BV

"What makes it even worse is that one side (apparently, the wife's family) is feeding local blogger Robert Wightman the "dirt" on Sanchez." 

Every claim and counterclaim which has been posted on the BV has come from the documents filed with the court.  Anyone can go to the second floor of the Administration building and look at all of the filings on the computer for free.  If you want a document it is a dollar a page.  My receipts and the county clerk's files will show I paid for my documents. They are also witness to me being up there on a regular basis.

BUT LET'S SEE WHAT JUANITO CLAIMS LORRIE SANCHEZ IS FEEDING ME TO POST

[1] I said she makes me want to puke, [2] I said what kind of mother of 4 posts half naked pictures of herself on the internet, [3] I said Saenz was stretching it a bit by bringing assault charges against Robert Sanchez based on Sanchez slapping his 17 year old's hand, [4] I said Lorrie and her father were out of line for tearing out the bushes and taking down a tree without the court's permission, [5] On Friday morning I rejected a comment claiming Lorrie's father threatened to kill Sanchez - I made it a point I deal in court documents - I went to the court, and then printed that in fact Sanchez was claiming Joe Garza Sr. threatened to kill him - this according to Juanito is Lorrie feeding me dirt against Sanchez. [6] I made it clear that Lorrie's lawyer was out of line for the meeting in his office without Sanchez's lawyer present. [7] I called Lorrie anything but an angel - and on and on.

Unlike Juanito I have rejected nasty comments against both parties and limited claims to that which appears in the pleadings.  The comment he has approved against Lorrie Sanchez is vile and disgusting.  Hopefully her attorney will get a subpoena on the IP address so it can be addressed.

Now could you imagine what I would be saying if she was not feeding me garbage?  This is typical Juanito - he has to lie and say someone is feeding me information when he knows full well all I have done is quote the pleadings.  Anyone from home can see the docket sheet.  But for now you have to go to the Administration building to read the actual pleadings.

My reporting has been focused on forcing an end to the nightmare the children were caught in.

If in fact the police were called to the church, everyone in that church will be talking about the alleged incident for a long time.  The children's friends in church know what is happening because they saw it with their own eyes, and not because they read it on the BV.

After the BV made a big issue of Judge De Coss allowing this case to get out of control, he finally called an emergency hearing on the 17th, and suspended Robert Sanchez visitation rights on a temporary basis.  He then appointed two people - one to look into the best interests of the children, and a Parenting Expert - which is exactly what the BV said needed to be done.

The BV went out of its way stating that the civil and criminal courts should consider it favorable for Robert Sanchez if he were to go into rehab for two months.  In fact the BV set up Saenz to give Sanchez a good deal if he went to rehab.  Experts in Domestic Abuse, which the BV has covered, find this to be the better option because it can lead to the family healing which is what is in the best interests of the children.

But no, instead of taking the time to reflect on what is best for himself and his children Sanchez chooses to go on the attack.

This case will not be decided by the blogs, but by Robert Sanchez's conduct.  The attorney for the children and the Parenting expert will report back to the court how he is responding to these developments.  The court will give very little weight to the arguments of the parties, while favoring its appointees.  If the lawyer for the children and the Parenting expert testify that Sanchez remains hostile to the healing process, when he gets back his visitation rights it will be supervised again.  termination of parental rights is a big thing, and very, very unlikely as the facts stand now. 

Gamez better bring his client under control.  Gamez knows how it works, and Sanchez going on the attack will not work for Sanchez.

AS TO JUANITO'S RENDITION OF THE OLD LITIGATION BETWEEN MYSELF AND SANCHEZ - ITS PURE FALLACY

There was never any claim by me of going to the U.S. Supreme Court after the Texas Supreme Court denied the mandamus.  In fact the BV posted a story the Court was correct in lifting the Stay on the gag order because upon further review I realized that the order as written by Peter Zavaletta was so incoherent it was unenforceable as a matter of law.  The Texas Supreme Court did the right thing.  Having agreed with the Texas Supreme Court after further review of the gag order, why would I spend a good $25,000 trying to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.  They receive over 8000 appeals a year and only hear 80-85 cases a year. It's all lies.

Two not three insurance companies paid a total of $60,000 while the case was pending.  The case was never dismissed and every effort by Sanchez's lawyer to get the case dismissed failed. After the Zavalaetta debacle on the gag order they realized it was better to pay than to continue listening to Zavaletta.  Further, no attorney ever appeared for the insurance company which covered liability for the restaurant.  It was James Hunter personal friend to Robert Sanchez who got the insurance company to throw in money to make the case go away.  The business insurance company never hired counsel to defend Sanchez - one big lie.

WHAT IS SAD IS SANCHEZ IS CHOOSING CONFRONTATION AND LIES INSTEAD OF GETTING HELP

Anyone familiar with family law cases - something Juanito has no experience in except going to jail for contempt for non-payment of child support, knows Sanchez asking the criminal and civil courts for two months to go to rehab will work to his advantage big time, if after rehab the counselors testify he has healed.  Saenz will be justified in giving him a good plea bargain - although the case involving his 17 year son should be dismissed as without merit, and the attorney for the children and Parenting expert will be the first to stand with Sanchez if his wife continues to oppose peace even after he successfully completes rehab.
 
SANCHEZ NEEDS ADVICE FROM PEOPLE WHO WANT TO HELP HIM AND NOT SOMEONE WITH A HAND OUT FOR BEER MONEY

Gamez, bring your client under control before he self destructs. His self destruction is the worst thing possible for his children.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have seen Juan Montoya numerous times at the Captain Bob restaurant. I guess he's trying to milk the free food while he can.

Anonymous said...

What a crock of shit Montoya writes. He makes a living off of exploitation and extorting money from people. His employers are unqualified, sleazy candidates who cannot win an election without hiring a desperate blogger to write lies about their opponents. He's trying to make you look like the mean ole blogger with no heart? Puhlease. He daily hurts people with lies. He purports himself to be a journalist, but he is nothing more than a paid character assassin fueled by the thoughts of how and where he'll get his next beer.

BobbyWC said...

The post cost Deleon upwards of 250 votes. I warned Deleon and he refused the advice. His claim was he could not stop Begum for paying for the ad. Something in the post is a bold face lie and a certain clan will now for sure not be casting one vote for Deleon.

The fact he even associates with Begum should inform everyone he is no better than Oliveira. Deleon really screwed himself. Blaming Begum for the ad he was against is pathetic. be a man Don and take responsibility.

I will not be covering that election. I may not like Oliveira, but Deleon has proven himself to be just like every other politician - cutting deals with the devil before one vote is cast.

Bobby WC