Sunday, July 19, 2015

 
VICTOR CORTES AND GUS GARZA


At the Gun Range with my good friend and neighbor Gus Garza on June 25, 2015.
 
MAJOR BREAKING STORY
 
 "nothing is ever as it appears."  I am nowhere by chance and everywhere by intent. "

Remember how no one cared about sheriff Conrado [ indicted and sitting in federal prison] Cantu's friends.  Well it is for sure time to care about Victor Cortez's friends.  Of course to protect Sorola - [I do not understand you Juanito - by all rights I am entitled to half of everything Sorola gives you - without me he would not give you a penny] Juanito will lie again and claim I am supporting Victor Cortez.  It never happened and never will happen.

Further, anyone giving money to  a Republican candidate for sheriff is wasting their money.  With a presidential race and Hillary Clinton heading the ballot, the Cameron county democrats are going to turn out in large numbers and pull a straight democratic ticket.

So, Victor Cortez would have us believe as sheriff he is going to clean up Cameron county by having as his friend a lawyer assistant district attorney who is facing multiple State Bar ethical violations, and possible criminal charges for illegally releasing an expunged criminal record.

The name Conrado Cantu should come to mind when you think of Victor Cortez - he is the friends he keeps

GUS GARZA AND LOUIS SOROLA ORDERED TO REPSOND TO CLAIMS OF UNETHICAL CONDUCT RELATED TO ALLEGED BRIBE CASE AND IMPROPER DISMISSAL OF FELONY CHARGES FOR HECTOR NEGRETE

I will get the documents uploaded, but it is 9 and I promised the story.  The Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals as appointed by the Texas Supreme Court found the claims against Gus Garza and Louis Sorola merit further investigation and has ordered both to respond to the ethics complaint.

Like in any case, until there is a finding of wronging, we are only dealing with possible violations.  It does not matter whether it is a criminal case or a disciplinary care, until the process of due process is complete and a finding is made, we remain at the stage of an allegation.  The State Bar such as a court cannot claim an illegal act has occurred until it is reviewed and due process has been completed.

But what is important is, BODA ordered the State Bar Office of Disciplinary Counsel to move forward on the investigation.  They specifically granted they appeal dismissing the complaints.

LUIS SOROLA AND HIS DRUNK MONKEY EAT CROW

"SOROLA WHIPS BOBBY AT STATE BAR; WILL HE WANT MORE? "

Well maybe the State Bar not wanting to be on the cover-up side again, with criminal cases being dismissed and then donations being made to the DA, such as under Villalobos, decided upon learning of the FBI investigation it better actually to follow the law this time, or actually have control of the facts before protecting unethical lawyers again.

GUS GARZA FACING MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS AND NOW POSSIBLE CRIMINAL CHARGES

There are two formal complaints now pending against Gus Garza.  In the first because he works for Saenz, in an attempt to discredit his accuser used Saenz's office to obtain an expunged criminal record and sent it to the State Bar.  [CLARIFICATION - HE USED A SUMMARY WHICH INCLUDED AN EXPUNGED CRIMINAL RECORD] Gus Garza is waiting to learn if his conduct will be a separate complaint or be included in the original complaint.

Any honest DA would immediately suspend Gus Garza for illegally using an expunged criminal record.  Not Louis Saenz - Garza is too tied to the corruption within Saenz's office.

It is a crime to release an expunged criminal record.  Whether or not the grand jury judge or Saenz will try and stop the criminal investigation is unknown.  But it is a crime to release an expunged criminal record.  The criminal conduct extends to everyone in Saenz's office who helped to pull the expunged record.

A third certified complaint entitles the State Bar to seek the suspension of Gus Garza's license.




I can assure my readers, Sorola will continue to hang himself.  He is addicted to his contempt for the law as Juanito is to beer.  He will not care one bit how it affects his wife JP Mary Esther Garcia Sorola.

SOROLA TO FACE NEW COMPLAINT

As everyone knows, using the above headline Sorola paid Juanito to defame me and lie that I in fact filed the complaint which has now been ordered to be investigate.  Today I hope to finish my individual complaint against Sorola for his bought and paid for lies.

SAENZ TO ALSO FACE COMPLAINT

In the Hector Negrete case it was Saenz who received the campaign donation.  Saenz was also the first signature on the Motion to Dismiss on the bogus claim of Double Jeopardy. 

THE UNDERLYING STORY OF HECTOR NEGRETE

I believe based on the evidence a reasonable jury could find Judge Arturo Nelson a party to what happened.
 
The facts are clear - some 5 days after Judge Nelson dismissed felony criminal charges against Hector Negrete, Louis Sorola on August 28, 2013, donated some $500 to Luis Saenz.  The date is key.  There was no ongoing political campaign.  For purposes of donations it was basically a dead season.  I need to work on the other donors during this same period.  Too many donations for a non-election period.  I am well on my way to researching all of these lawyers.
 
I was in court when this happened.  I repeat: I have said this over and over again - "nothing is ever as it appears."  I am nowhere by chance and everywhere by intent.
 
I will tell you a criminal investigator has been assigned by the Texas AG's office to investigate Luis Saenz.  These documents along with those related to the Begum alleged bribery case which is pending with the FBI are going to the investigator with the Texas AG's office.
 
An attorney by the name of Leticia Barguiarena was court appointed to represent Hector Negrete in multiple criminal cases.  They involved different victims.  This is part of the key - I am certain Leticia Barguiarena knew the law and this is why she withdrew in case number 2013-DCR-1316.  She was unwilling to be party to a fraud on the court.
 
"This Court has recognized the protection against double jeopardy is inapplicable where separate and distinct offenses occur during the same transaction. Spradling, supra; Jones v. State, 514 S.W.2d 255 (Tex.Crim.App.1974)"
 
Key here is the cases each had different victims.  Double jeopardy does not attach when one crime spree involves more than one victim. Also double jeopardy does not apply if at least one element in one crime is different from a different crime.  But really the key here is different victims.
 
When I was in court, Louis Sorola and Guz Garza agreed the state had agreed to dismiss the charges based on double jeopardy.    The case number is 2013-DCR-1316.
 
For cause the order of dismissal says the "defendant was convicted in another case."  13-CCR-3019.
 
The 3019 case is a misdemeanor case not a felony which requires a different level of damages.  It also involved a completely different victim - hence no double jeopardy.
 
Leticia Barguiarena knew this because she negotiated the plea in the 1319, case.  This is why she withdrew.  She knew there was no legal basis to ask for dismissal based on double jeopardy. Four days after she withdrew, Judge Nelson appointed Louis Sorola out of order.  This means, Sorola was not next on the list, but Judge Nelson appointed him anyway.  This can only be done "unless the court makes a finding of good cause on the record for appointing an attorney out of order."  There is no such finding in the order other than a perfunctory statement good cause was found - what that good cause is, is not noted.
 
Judge Nelson could not chance that the next attorney on the list would refuse to pursue the motion to dismiss as without merit, so he had to appoint Louis Sorola out of order.
 
Now think about this, who better to go before Judge Nelson on August 23, 2013, than the attorney who negotiated the plea in the case which forms the basis of the double jeopardy claim?  Leticia Barguiarena, to her credit would not corrupt the process, and withdrew.
 
OH IT GETS BETTER:
 
Judge Nelson did not require one ounce of proof that the defendant had been convicted in another case, and signed the order of dismissal in the 1316 case. 
 
Here is the real kicker.  - on September 13, 2013, in another case 3018, ADA Joe Arreola asked that the charges be dismissed because the defendant had been convicted in the 1316 case.  Which by the way is the case which was dismissed based on the conviction in the 1319 case, which is also a completely different victim.
 
Upon reporting this fraud to the court, I was told Judge Betancourt refused to sign the Order of Dismissal because the defendant had already plead in the case in June 2013. 
 
 
THE QUESTION IS - WHY DID LETICIA BARGUIARENA FEEL A NEED TO WITHDRAW JUST DAYS BEFORE THE COURT HEARD THE MOTION TO DISMISS AND JUDGE NELSON FELT A NEED TO APPOINT LOUIS SOROLA OUT OF ORDER FOR A SIMPLE DISMISSAL?
 
She knew Gus Garza's motion was without merit and could not defend her client based on a lie to the court - so she withdrew.
 
It was one big fraud on the court.
 
The only possible explanation I can find for such an outright contempt for the law is an Adriana Negrete donated money to Saenz and also worked on his campaign.  Was it a favor?
 
The fact they have the same last name does not mean they are related.  But guys, there are not a lot of Negretes in Brownsville.  This is the only possible link I can find to explain this case.
 
More tomorrow on more bad cases.
 
Also, why the fraud for a no body drunk punk?

 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I could never Vote for a man that is a democratic, and is trying to full the republicans, that he is a republican... If he is already losing to the voters about this. What will he do if he becomes sheriff???? To me he looks like he is up to no good,,,, he reminds me of Alex Perez RAT, Conrado Cantu Rat, ... At least be honest Victor, are you a TRUE DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN.. BECAUSE TO ME IT LOOKS AS IF YOUR RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN BECAUSE YOU WON'T WIN AS A DEMICRAT... MY VOTE IS GOING TO JHON CHAMBER'S, HE IS A COOL CAT...AND WELL SPOKEN....

Anonymous said...

This is true, why is he campaigning as a republican, when he is a democrat, and the district attorney Luis is flounting him and praising him, as if Cortez is a god... Come one Luis man up, don't be missing his ass... Cortez will become corrupted ..he is already lieing to the community. He ain't no Republican, he is a democrat.... Post July 21,2015... Your right

Anonymous said...

Cortez is a Republican. Look at his voting record. The man has been a Republican for YEARS. You guys are too damn ignorant to use what is public ally available to formulate a conclusion.

Stop being assholes and think before you type. Or better yet, just stop being assholes. We have too many already.

Anonymous said...

As for Chambers that guy is running around saying Cortez is really a Democrat because he is scared. He has years and years of baggage and can't win on his record or the truth. Either he is lying to his supporters outright or he too is ignorant and doesn't know that Cortez has been a card carrying Republican for decades. Babosos. You'd believe anything a candidate tells you if he gives you a little attention and free food at a party.

BobbyWC said...

First of all there is no such thing as a card carrying Republican in Texas. Our primaries are open and you do not register for any political party.

What Cortez needs to do is have Remi Garza print out the last 10 years of how he voted in the primaries and that will be the best evidence of which party he votes with.

Both your comments were valid - but they lose credibility when you say he is a card carrying Republican when no such animal exists in Texas

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Well said Bobby WC.. Is there any way you can get that information, that would really help me decided in which way to vote. I would like to know if he is a republican or a democrat or even just to know how he has voted in the past 10 years in the primary elections, that would really help. Thank you for doing a great jo . In giving us information.