Wednesday, March 25, 2015






 
DID THE BV PLAY FAVORITES ON THE PORN BLOG ISSUE?

Well, maybe - and I do not like sacred cows - so I am making amends.  Mr. Paz-Martinez rightfully pointed out that Robert Sanchez and Sergio Zarate are not the only ones paying McHale to advertise on his porn blog.  For the record Sanchez is a liar when he says he knows nothing about what is happening.  I have his court transcript from last time where he lied.  I have his sworn statement to the Texas Ethics Commission wherein he committed verified perjury.  The lawsuit is coming Robert, and this time in addition to your business I am including Lorrie as a willful participant.

I have no real defense other than to say the others have not allowed for vulgar defamatory statements.  But none the less as possible office holders they are promoting a pornographer.  Per se I have no objections to pornography - it is a legal profession whether anyone likes it or not.  But it does not suit Brownsville's image if elected officials or candidates promote pornography during the election.

Apparently Rick Longoria sees nothing wrong whatsoever with advertising along side pornography while asking families to vote for him.  This is a major flaw in judgment.  As an elected official you have a public imagine to uphold.

I have made clear I like César de León - but there is no effective means of communicating with him unless you run into him.  He will answer your questions if you run into him - he is quite affable. So I have no verification if he is even paying McHale.  Remember I told you Jessica Tetreau was not paying him.  When she finally refused payment he went on the attack.

My greatest disappointment is Michael Gonzalez.  We have had many back and forth on the issue.  He refuses to answer any questions - it is always the same.  He will only talk to the blogs through press releases.  This is not a professional response and is in fact an indicator he finds the people and their questions a nuisance.  This is not complex.

I just insisted he give me his position on the issue before I publish this, and he said "no comment."  The voters should respond in kind at the ballot - "no comment"- I may not like Rick Longoria's response but at least he respects the people enough to answer the difficult question.

Hiding behind a moronic campaign position of "I only speak through press releases" is not how you get elected.  It also shows a contempt for the people.

The BV will not play - he can send all of his press releases to the porn blog because that is now the only place he will be heard.  The BV will not print them.

2 comments:

BobbyWC said...

Not playing dude - the BV lead in giving Michael Gonzalez a voice. You obviously think Michael refusing to answer questions is acceptable. My issue was clearly spelled out - he will not answer questions other than through press releases - I did not tie him directly to the porn in my post - my issue is his contempt for the people - he had a free hand on the BV to discuss anything he wanted and I gave it to him.

So take your pathetic lies elsewhere - the BV will not play.

Any candidate who thinks they are above answering questions of any sort other than in controlled press releases is not fit for elective office - that is my issue and nothing more.

I did not attack Rick for being honest - I praised him for his honestly while expressing my dissatisfaction with his response - so what is your problem? - right you have no response so you try to post a lie.

I have not asked anyone to not vote for Rick who continues his ad, so what does my post have to do with punishing Jerry? Nothing

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

These guys are scumbags! I'm not voting for any of them. That blog is always railing on the same three women and a man and his children.