Monday, October 6, 2014

ALEX DOMINGUEZ "I WILL NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE"
 
Once again the State Bar proves it is a criminal enterprise and will not enforce its rules of ethics against the politically protected.
 
I file quite a few of theses. Now think about this - with every other state agency I win every time, but with the State Bar they refuse every complaint - why?  I file so many because I use them for another purpose - namely to show how corrupt the State Bar really is.
 
The most egregious example of the State Bar protecting its own happened maybe 12-14 years.  Numerous eye witnesses signed affidavits.  The lawyer then president of the State Bar Young Lawyers associate in open court swung at me and called me a f..ing faggot.  I fell back and hurt my ankle - he had to be restrained.  The State Bar found that even if the allegations were true no unethical conduct occurred.
 
THINK ABOUT IT - HAS THE STATE BAR TAKEN ANY REAL SUBSTANTIVE ACTION AGAINST THE NON-PROSECUTED LAWYERS IN THE VILLALOBOS ET AL CASE?  OSCAR DE LA FUENTE HAS NO DISCIPLINARY HISTORY.  WHY?  PROTECTED BY THE DOJ
 
THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS MADE ABEL LIMAS AND ARMANDO VILLALOBOS.
 
Every lawyer knows that if you give enough time and money to the State Bar, you cannot be touched - it is that simple.  Then you have the politically protected who cannot be touched.
 
THE CASE OF ALEX DOMINGUEZ
 
The State Bar found that even if my allegations are true, no unethical conduct has occurred to justify an investigation.
 
THE ALLEGATIONS
 
Cameron County verified in writing that neither Dan Sanchez nor Alex Dominguez have complied with State Bar Ethics Opinions 530 or 540.  My open records request specifically asked for all documents which showed Cameron county has given both Dan Sanchez and Alex Dominguez as county commissioners permission to practice law in Cameron county courts.  Part of the latter includes evidence that they have had their clients sign waivers concerning conflicts of interest.
 
Dylbia Jefferies, counsel for Cameron county, in writing stated there is no record of compliance with either 530 or 540.  That was my proof - her response to my Open Records Request.
 
HERE ARE THE ETHICS OPINIONS - NOW ANYONE EXPLAIN TO ME GIVEN DYLBIA HAS VERIFIED NON-COMPLIANCE HOW OTHER THAN THROUGH CORRUPTION HAS THE STATE BAR FOUND NO ETHICAL VIOLATION TO INVESTIGATE? 
 
 
 
"CONCLUSION

 Attorney who is a county commissioner would violate Rule 1.06(b)(2) by representing a private client in any justice, statutory county, or district courts in that county in the absence of effective consent by all affected or potentially affected clients as required by Rule 1.06(c). This conflict of interest also applies to all attorneys associated with the Attorney’s law firm."
 
 
"CONCLUSION

 It is a conflict of interest under Rule 1.06(b)(2) for a lawyer who is a county judge to represent a private client in any justice of the peace, statutory county courts, and district courts in that county. Under Rule 1.06(f) this conflict of interest also extends to all lawyers associated with the private law firm in which the county judge practices. The county judge and lawyers associated with his law firm can accept or continue such representation only upon compliance with the requirements of Rule 1.06(c), which includes the consent of the private client and the county to the representation after full disclosure of the existence, nature, implications, and possible adverse consequences of the conflict of interest."
 
I am doing the appeal - but I know it is futile.  Under the rules you are not allowed to say why the decision is wrong.  You simply have to hope they see it - and for the record they never see it.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS MADE ABEL LIMAS AND ARMANDO VILLALOBOS

It made you too, dummy!

BobbyWC said...

No, because since before I was licensed I was a strong critic of their corruption. I never let it go and fought the good fight - and continue to fight because justice matters - something the state bar opposes

Bobby WC