Monday, March 17, 2014


ALEX DOMIGUEZ HIT WITH THIRD TEXAS ETHICS INVESTIGATION - AND SAENZ's REFUSAL TO TAKE ACTION ON THE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING

The full story on Tuesday

Here is the  violation that Alex Dominguez failed to timely file his campaign finance report.  Normally the maximum fine on this might be about $500, but because he is showing a consistent contempt for the rules there is a real possibility he will be hit with a lot larger fine. 

 
Click to Enlarge
 
TO PUT THIS IN CONTEXT - I WILL POST THE OTHER TWO COMPLAINTS ALONG WITH THE CRIMINAL STATUTES INVOLVED - WHERE IS SAENZ'S PUBLIC INTEGRITY OFFICER? - NO WHERE TO BE FOUND - WE CALL THIS SELECTIVE PROSECUTION FOR POLITICAL GAIN.
 
But first from an old Herald Article - Grand Jury walks out over Saenz's abuse of grand jury and selective prosecution.

 
Click to Enlarge
 
THE FIRST COMPLAINT -

The verification of the complaint below shows an alleged violation of § 253.031(a) of the Election Code.

(a) A candidate may not knowingly accept a campaign contribution or make or authorize a campaign expenditure at a time when a campaign treasurer appointment for the candidate is not in effect -

A VIOLATION IS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR

(f) A person who violates this section commits an offense. An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanorClick for Election Code

 
Click to Enlarge
 
THE SECOND COMPLAINT

The verification of the complaint below shows an allegation of violation of Texas Election Code 255.006.

(c)  For purposes of this section, a person represents that a
candidate holds a public office that the candidate does not hold if:

(1)  the candidate does not hold the office that the candidate seeks;  and 

 (2)  the political advertising or campaign  communication states the public office sought but does not include the word "for" in a type size that is at least one-half the type size used for the name of the office to clarify that the candidate does not hold that office.

A VIOLATION IS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR

 (e)  An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.  Click for Election Code



When you are politically connected like Alex Dominguez - his campaign manager being Saenz's boy toy Zeke Silva you are not bound by the law, but if you give enough money to Luis Saenz [namely $6,000] he will prosecute anyone who calls your mother a fake.

See criminal Information against Josefina Canales - which the visiting judge threw out as bogus after the dishonorable Art McDonald refused to sign the order Dismissing the Complaint.

 
FBI AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONs REMAIN OPEN
 
My sources have confirmed the FBI is now formally investigating Saenz, Alex and Yolanda Begum and Judge Art McDonald over this matter.  I have the letter from the Commission on Judicial Conduct verifying their investigation. 
 
I know enough to not overwhelm them with documents.  I am considering sending the entire Alex Dominguez file, including what I have learned about how he is financing his campaign, to the FBI as part of the Josefina Canales Fisher ccomplaint, not for a second investigation, but as further evidence that money and association with Saenz buys you protection.
 
MARY ESTER GARCIA's POSSIBLE INDICTMENT
 
I am walking away from it.  Not because there is no evidence - there is plenty of evidence which meets the elements of barratry under the Texas Penal Code.  I have read the detective's texts that Saenz's office is refusing to prosecute not because no crime was committed, but because Sorola dropped the federal lawsuit.
 
I am now being told by the only person who can provide me a copy of everything that she deleted the detective's texts, and that she already gave me the file.  I never received anything.  I have been ready to move on this for months.  The second I would have gotten the file I would have dropped everything to get the matter to the AG, and finalize the grand jury investigation.
 
For whatever reason this person has decided to not fight the corruption - and now we know how you become a victim of corruption? - when given a chance to fight you cut and run.
 
I may sign an affidavit with what I know and send it to the AG - but without the complaint and evidence collected by the police I am going nowhere.  I have considered INS as an agency to investigate since the couple was seeking residency papers for the husband, but again my mere affidavit of what I read in now deleted text messages may have no value.
 
THE POSSIBLE ELECTION CONTEST
 
I have to be careful in what I say because I do not want to reveal which campaigns have been speaking with me. 
 
"(c)  A contestant must file the petition not later than the 10th day after the date the official result is determined in a contest of:

  (1)  a primary election;  or
                                                
  (2)  a general or special election for which a runoff is necessary according to the official result or will be necessary if the contestant prevails.
 
From the Secretary of States Office - Recount delays final "Certificate of Election" by Canvasing Board
"
DOES NOT delay canvassing, but the canvassing authority must make a note on the canvass that a recount has been requested. Submission of a recount petition delays the issuance of a certificate of election and qualification for the office involved in the recount pending completion of recount;

Click for SOS

From the Election Code

"§ 67.016. CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION.  (a) After the completion of a canvass, the presiding officer of the local canvassing authority shall prepare a certificate of election for each candidate who is elected to an office for which the official result is determined by that authority's canvass."

Based on all of this it would seem Gloria Rincones or Minerva Peña will have 10 days to  file an election context after the final canvas.

BUT WARNING TO OTHER CANDIDATES

Word is getting out what is being alleged as the wrongdoing during the count.  The 10 days are ticking for the candidates who have not filed for a recount.  I do not believe that if an election contest is filed y Rincones or Peña that the other candidates will get the benefit of a finding because of the problems with the ballots the true winners of the election cannot be determined.  I believe the ruling will only apply to those who actually file an election contest on a timely basis - and for other than Rincones and Peña that 10 day clock is ticking fast. 

Guys a judge cannot void your election based on a finding no true winner can be determined if your opponents have not been sued and provided an opportunity to respond.  What may very well happen, because counting to 10 for so many of these candidates is a challenge, Rincones and Peña may get new elections, while the others get nothing even though the judge found because of problems with the ballots a true winner could not be determined.

FINALLY, LOOK FOR MONTOYA'S ATTACK ON ME SO AS TO MAKE YOU BELEIVE THESE DOCUMENTS ARE FALSE AND THE ELECTION CODE LINKED TO IS THE PRODUCT OF A HOMOSEXUAL COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY

They cannot refute the evidence, so Montoya will be paid to create a distraction

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is it one of yours? Ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? At this point we don't care, find someone who's not you to file one next time.

BobbyWC said...

Cried wolf means they do not exist - I have posted the other 2 and am about to post this won - one qualified as a complaint I have won every complaint I ever filed - one candidate violating he rules 3 times in one election is an all time record.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Way to go Bobby thanks for posting nothing but the truth. Keep us posted

BobbyWC said...

DOJ down loaded today's post - they were probably upset I confirmed the ongoing investigation against Saenz and Alex and Yolanda Begum

15:02:36Browser:IE 9.0OS:Win7Resolution:1920x1080 United States Flag Total Visits:18Location:Potomac, Maryland, United StatesIP Address:Us Dept Of Justice (149.101.1.118) [Label IP Address]Referring URL:
(No referring link)
Visit Page:

brownsvillevoice.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

"My sources have confirmed the FBI is now formally investigating Saenz, Alex and Yolanda Begum and Judge Art McDonald over this matter. I have the letter from the Commission on Judicial Conduct verifying their investigation."

I am sorry but the documents that you have exhibited are difficult to read or perhaps my eyesight is not that good. Did you post the letter on the investigation? If not, can you post it so that we your readers can read it. Thank you, it will definitely be good reading.

BobbyWC said...

You have to click to enlarge the letters. As to the FBI they do not send out letters. As to Art McDonald I covered that when the Commission opened the investigation.

I will look for the letter - as I type I am looking for a DMN article I posted and cannot seem to find.

I will see about getting a duplicate copy of the letter verifying the investigation against Art McDonald

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

The DOJ downloading the post should tell you that you are on to something.The fact that it's coming from out of state screams they do not trust the local FBI.Do you have any thoughts on this? Also let them get upset ,you shouldn't have to be doing their work for them.

BobbyWC said...

The do knows i know the line. in fact they know i am not saying some key things because i know the line and not to cross it

Anonymous said...

"The do knows i know the line. in fact they know i am not saying some key things because i know the line and not to cross it"

This sentence has numerous spelling, grammar and syntax errors.

BobbyWC said...

I need to stop typing from the cell phone - my point was the DOJ knows me well enough to know I know what I can and cannot say - that is what I mean by the line - so restated another way - because I know how far I can go in my statements I have no fear of the DOJ.

Now of course I am on a medication to help me sleep - the hypothalamic dysfunction messes with the clock in my head - so it's anyone's guess what I am typing now.

QUESTION AND HELP

Out of no where my phone is intuiting the words I want to type - it's a nightmare - how do I turn off the function

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Check the "Auto Correct" settings if your phone has that.

BobbyWC said...

Thanks , I checked several places that might be and nothing - I will just go to the phone company and let them fix it - but thanks for caring enough to give me an idea on how to fix it.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

You mentioned that Alex Dominguez has the all time record of ethics violations for a candidate, how many does he have, the three you have mentioned or are there more?

BobbyWC said...

I have never seen more than three in one election cycle
but if you know of someone with mote than three in one election cycle i will print that story and make clear that person had mote than Alex. but i have never seen this many

Anonymous said...

What are the odds of being criminally prosecuted for these violations? Has anyone been prosecuted before for similar case?

BobbyWC said...

In terms of saenz if you are his friend non existent - I have seen the Texas Ethics Commission refer cases for criminal prosecution on the same issues where for another candidate they basically issue a small fine.

How this is decided seems to be purely random and arbitrary. One time when I complained I was told in part they make the decision based on how the candidate responds to the complaint and how many complaints they have.

Bobby WC

BobbyWC said...

Guys I do not post comments which allege people do drugs - and to be clear -the accusation was not against Alex Dominguez

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

At the risk of sounding obtuse and having just moved to this area - this seems like tiddlywinks. Having run for and served office in other parts of farther north areas of our state before retiring here... as long as you put "Vote" or "Choose" and then Name followed by "Position" (and NOT re-elect, etc.) then you are fine. I did it, my opponents did it, and no one turned anyone in for such silly things. There are far bigger issues in my new Cameron County than this. For instance, the fact that there appears to be some kind of accepted practice of taking senior citizens to vote and telling them how to vote and a clear violation of abusing absentee ballots (and no one seems to care, which is sad). Then, you have the issue of the Port and Education Boards both not being on the same ballot schedule, effectively ensuring that incumbents win. So, maybe instead of all this nonsense going after language in an ad, we need to go for more voter awareness, education, and fairness overall? I don't know, just my thoughts.