Tuesday, November 19, 2013


"BOBBY, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE OBVIOUS TO ME BECAUSE I AM TOO STUPID TO SEE IT"

First, I have confirmed with documents that back from March through September there were two personnel reviews of David Garcia and Pete Sepulveda.  On March 7, 2013, the personnel review was initiated by Ernie Hernandez.

Click for Document

The matter was then voted on to proceed in Executive session. " Upon motion by Commissioner Benavides, seconded by Commissioner Sanchez and carried unanimously, the Court met in Executive Session at 10:35 A.M. to discuss the following matters:" " (A)     DELIBERATIONS REGARDING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S AND DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S DUTIES AND EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF COUNTY AFFAIRS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §551.074(a)(1)."
See Item K

On September 20, 2013, a second request was made to review Pete Sepuvleda.   It was made by Pete Sepulveda himself.

Click for document 

On September 26, 2013 "Upon motion by Commissioner Benavides, seconded by Commissioner Garza and carried unanimously, the Court met in Executive Session at11:27 A.M. to discuss the following matters:"   "DELIBERATION AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE DUTIES OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, PURSUANT TO V.T.C.A. GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTION 551.074."
Click for item K
You will note, in each case every commissioner voted to do the review.  I'm just curious for all of you conspiracy people, if Commissioners Court does not review the job performance of the top two administrators - please do tell - who does?
And if you believe Pete Sepulveda he put his own review on the agenda because Ernie Hernandez forced him to.
Again there was no story.  All of the commissioners agreed to the review and it was Luis Sorola's future mother in law who initiated the vote each time to do the review.  There is nothing nefarious - just standard practices.

NOW PAY ATTENTION LUIS
I know the above was above your IQ, but this one might be easier for you.  Calling in witnesses to intimidate them is called witness tampering.  By storming the Dancy building you proved to everyone that you will try and intimidate witnesses regardless of the evidence.  Does the name Roberto Cadriel sound familiar?

THE EVIDENCE WHICH WILL NEVER CHANGE
All  four commissioners and County Judge Cascos will be called to testify that  Ernie Hernandez had nothing to do with the personnel reorganization in HR and that pay reduction was never on the table.

JUST CURIOUS LUIS
What makes you think interrogating Juan Gonzales, A.R. Flores, and Cris Valadez, will change this simple fact.  The commissioners know best their intent and everyone of them and Judge Cascos will testify that Ernie had nothing to do with the reorganization of HR.  What in gods name did you hope to accomplish by making a fool of yourself at the Dancy building.  The commissioners and Judge Cascos' testimony will not change.

No comments: