Thursday, May 30, 2013



BISD - A BASTION OF UNETHICAL CONDUCT WITH NO ONE WILLING TO STOP IT

VIEWING THE ABOVE IN THE CONTEXT OF FEDERAL JUDGE HANEN'S ORDER FOR THE DOJ TO PROVIDE THE STATE BAR ALL OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE VILLALOBOS CASE WHETHER ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE OR NOT

[NOTE - THE BV MAY HAVE A BREAKING STORY LATER THIS MORNING OR EARLY AFTERNOON]

Within BISD, Carl Montoya, the trustees, and counsel all work to insure unethical conduct remains protected.

Here is Judge Hanen's order

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/158605057/HanenOrder

For me here is the key part of Judge Hanen's order

"That being said, nothing can do more harm to society than an individual, (or a group of individuals) armed with a law license (or working for someone armed with a law license) that has no moral compass, no respect for the rules governing ethical conduct and no respect for the truth."

But first a related issue, to help my new readers.  Blogging in many regards is about destroying people for pay.  There is a known Brownsville blogger who everyone knows is paid to defame people,  If sworn to testimony is to believed, BISD Trustee Longoria funneled him $1,000 in unreported campaign/PAC money to aid in the conspiracy to defraud the Brownsville taxpayers out of $14.3 million, among other things.

THE VILLALOBOS TRIAL

When prospective jurors failed to appear for the trial, Judge Hanen issued an order  for US Marshals to pick them up and bring them before the magistrate judge.  Judge Hanen will not tolerate people avoiding his court.

The story by the above paid for blogger was Ruben Peña avoided service in the Villalobos trial.  The entire story was fabricated.  I did not pick up on the story because I knew it was false, plus the source is a paid for defame people blogger.  Ruben Peña is the special prosecutor appointed by Villalobos to dismiss the Pepe Villarreal case.  Pepe is the brother of Julio Villarreal and it involved Money House Seizure case.

Villarreal defended on the issue that the entire dismissal of the Pepe Villarreal murder case was a rouse to get him to return to the US.  My view is, it was part of the conspiracy by Villalobos to get his hands on the money which by his own admission was based on a bad search warrant.  He agreed to the dismissal of the Pepe Villarreal case in order to get the brother Julio to sign off on the forfeiture settlement.

HOW DO I KNOW THE STORY WAS FALSE

If Judge Hanen ordered prospective jurors to be picked up for non-appearance he  certainly would have order Ruben  Peña picked-up for avoiding service.  I was in court every minute the attorneys were in court.  The issue was never raised - and they know nothing about it.

NOW THE TRUTH

Ruben Peña was in Houston undergoing treatment for cancer.

To compound the lie, another blogger who is known  for defaming people and just outright fabricating stories posted the following.

 "This morning I received a tip indicating alleged unavailability involves more than the Armando Villalobos case:

"Jim, word is Mr. Pena is hiding out in Mexico. The F.B.I. is looking for him."


All along Ruben was in Houston undergoing cancer treatment.

To my readers - if you are prepared to believe a paid for blogger or another blogger who defames people and then defends his conduct by saying "you cannot get blood from a turnip," nothing in this town will get fixed.

BISD AND THE FRAUD

My long term readers know I did an open records request for Purchase Orders related to a certain employee.  A very reliable source told me this BISD employee has been using his PO privileges to buy and then sell items for his personal business.  I have never disclosed the employee's name or his department.  If the allegation is false, I do not want this person's name out there with these type false claims against him.

I have independent confirmation that the BISD police have called him in and have started the investigation.  The person at the vendor who handles PO's has verified the claims - at least as to my source.  This source has proven very reliable in the past.

It was my goal to compare the PO purchases to specific items I know were bought for resale to private individuals.  If I had a match, then I had proof.  This is how the BV works.

BISD refused to turn over the PO's claiming they do not exist.  I know this is a lie because this person's former supervisor and an internal BISD employee have told me the PO's exist.  In time I will handle this with the AG's office.  I requested all PO's - I did not limit the PO's to open or closed.  This is how BISD is playing the came.

BACK TO JUDGE HANEN'S ORDER AND BISD'S IN HOUSE COUNSEL

On an unrelated Open Records Request, BISD refuse to comply with the AG's order.  The case involved contract rigging.  I am still working on this story.  I may do an update with documents tomorrow.

After I complained to the AG's office that BISD was refusing to comply with there order, BISD's in house counsel sent me a letter that on a day certain BISD called me to pick up the documents and that I never went to retrieve the document.  Her name is Leandra Costilla Ortiz. 

I have told my readers a thousand times, the largest criminal enterprise in the state of Texas is the State Bar of Texas.  With no disrespect to Judge Hanen, his heart and goals are honorable, he is oblivious to this reality.

I filed an ethics complaint with the State Bar against Leandra Costilla Ortiz claiming she lied to the AG when she said I was called to retrieve the documents.  I included my TMobile phone bill so they  could see no such call was made on the day certain or any other day.  I did not only accuse her of lying to the Texas Attorney General's office, I produced her letter and my phone bill.

The State Bar ruled that even if it is true that Leandra Costilla Ortiz lied to the AG's office it does not violate the rules of ethics.

You got it, as a government employee she is protected.  I have been exposing this endless fraud with the State Bar for well over 20 years.   I will appeal the decision along with a formal complaint to the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court, and a formal complaint to the FBI in Austin.  The ruling came from David Nowlin, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel for the State Bar.  I will be including Judge Hanen's order - remember what he said.

"That being said, nothing can do more harm to society than an individual, (or a group of individuals) armed with a law license (or working for someone armed with a law license) that has no moral compass, no respect for the rules governing ethical conduct and no respect for the truth."

VILLALOBOS DID NOT JUST HAPPEN

Villalobos while in Dallas saw how millionaire lawyers are protected by the State Bar. They buy the benefit by donating free services to the State Bar and serving on committees.

Judge Hanen is in for a reality check when he learns that the State Bar ignores the evidence with the exception of a handful of people.  Judge David Gonzalez will not be touched for his part in the mess while serving under Villalobos.  He is now a judge.  Trey Martinez, son to Tony Martinez is exempt from investigation.  The list goes on and on and on.

THE SOLUTION

Judge Hanen has to identify the lawyers he believes need to be disciplined and refer them for disbarment to the Southern District of Texas. [note there is no federal bar such as the State Bar - every federal district, appellate district, and US Supreme Court have to initiate their own disciplinary proceedings.  The State Bar of Texas has no jurisdiction over who can and cannot practice law in federal court]

Judge Hanen can certainly put one of his law clerks to this task.  He needs to copy those specific complaints to the State Bar.  Only if the request personally comes from Judge Hanen, will the State Bar do its job - otherwise - those who are protected - will have the complaints dismissed as without merit.

AGAIN THE CASE OF LEANDRA COSTILLA ORTIZ

The State Bar ruled that even if it is true that Leandra Costilla Ortiz lied to the AG's office it does not violate the rules of ethics.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great,gonna be the same old bs,what a great big shithole.Looks like DA Saenz isn't going to do anything either.how wonderful for all the citizens of Cameron they can continue to watch their Constitutional rights flushed down the toilet.So happy I'm moving.

BobbyWC said...

On DA Saenz, he is already cleaning house - he was interviewed on channel 5 explaining what his office is doing.. Trust me he does not want the State Bar taking action against attorneys in his office, while he has done nothing.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

>>On DA Saenz, he is already cleaning house<<

Since when is rearranging the furniture, cleaning house?

BobbyWC said...

Rabb was a key player in the Livingston case and he is gone - DA Saenz is working on it - you cannot expect him to fire people based on mere accusations.

I am certain there will be more changes down the road

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Brownsville cops just raided another 8 liner.Cant believe these guys are still open

Anonymous said...

Are not the ADA's serving at the pleasure of the DA? Their employment is at at will, subject to termination for no cause.

Christian

BobbyWC said...

yes - but that does not mean you dispense with fairness

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

I doubt anyone will be disciplined by the Bar except De La Fuente. And definitelly not Angel Castro

BobbyWC said...

If Judge Hanen were to personally refer the attorneys he is concerned with to the Chief Judge for the Southern District and then copy the State Bar, they would not dare refuse to act while the federal courts are acting.

This is the only way these attorneys will be disciplined

Bobby WC

Thanks for your comment -

Anonymous said...

So if acted upon,does it mean they can not practice law in the state of Texas and in Federal court? if they pass the bar in another state would they be allowed to practice providing it wasn't federal?

BobbyWC said...

Using Texas as an example - if they belong to all federal courts they would have to be barred separately in the Northern Southern, Eastern and Western Districts, then the Fifth Circuit and then the US Supreme Court - assuming they are authorized to practice in each - as a formality once discipline occurs in one the others follow automatically after a hearing.

If someone is admitted to practice in several states, then the other states would have to bring their own proceedings.

The US Supreme Court has actually authorized lawyers to continue practicing law in all federal courts based on a finding the state process lacks in due process and cannot therefore form a basis for disbarment in federal courts.

If someone belongs to 9 federal appellate courts there will need to be 9 separate proceedings.

Such as the state bar of Texas - there is not one federal bar.

Further, it has been argued that you do not even need a license to practice in federal court. You do not need to be a lawyer to be a federal judge. In fact many federal judges allow there state license to expire because it is not needed.

It has been argued if you do not need a law license to be a federal judge then you do not need one to practice in federal court.

The Supreme Court has never agreed to hear the case.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Quite the brain you got, Bobby.Thanks for educating me.

Anonymous said...

who is mr. pena?

Anonymous said...

fbi or interpol ??????