Saturday, March 30, 2013



HOW THE MARGARITA OZUNA INDICTMENT WILL GO DOWN

EDITOR'S NOTE:  This picture is from Jim Barton's blog.  The BV always sources when it takes information from a news source or other blog.  I do not know any of these people by face.

Assuming a case has been stated, the AG will do exactly as the DOJ has done in the Limas case.  They will offer Ozuna a deal - give us the leaders and everyone else involved, including JP's who dismiss tickets in exchange for your help (the AG is aware of this), and you will get no jail time.  The AG's office is going to do what it needs to do to take down the entire practice and everyone tied to it.

In the Carlos Medrano case, as the JP he was removed from office and convicted.  The politiqueras all walked.  The target here is clearly Ernie Hernandez and the JP's who have been  dismissing the tickets at the requests of the politiqeras.  Do not forget, Linda Salazar had a mountain of mail ballots in the primaries even though she did not have an opponent.  Do not forget what Sheriff Lucio told me during the 2008 campaign, he pays the politiqueras through the favor of getting tickets dismissed. 

There will be more indictments - I am sure.

The other side is, the witness could become difficult thereby making the case impossible to prosecute. There is no guaranteed conviction here.  It is too early to tell.

See Indictment


http://www.docstoc.com/docs/150286921/Ozuna

The trial transcript for verification of what I am saying can be found here.


http://www.docstoc.com/docs/42131804/ElectionFraud-Penatrial-Part1

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/42132051/ElectionFraudPenaTrialPart2

In part one the first voter witness is Ricardo Liceaga. If you look to the top of the document you should be able to figure out how to fast forward to page 73.  The indictment is based on the testimony of Ricardo Liceaga

Yes, I am awake because Keaton woke me up.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sorry the dog woke you up, they woke me up also. Hopeful you can fall asleep fast and wake up rested. Nite.

BobbyWC said...

As you can see she woke me again - it is the medicine-

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

reading the court record shows me that ruben pena did a terrible job in asking these witness questions.

BobbyWC said...

really because I was in the courtroom and the first witness brought dead silence to the court room - and that is all that matters because the indictment begins and ends with his testimony.

So it seems to me like your statement is a distraction from the only testimony which matters

Bobby W

Anonymous said...

there is enough evidence to put everybody in jail, if the politiqueras walk the practice will continue only they will be more careful

BobbyWC said...

Until Ozuna starts to give people up all they have is the proof of the one witness - nothing more - if the testimony holds up Ozuna goes down

Now it is possible the feds are part of the investigation in term of tapping phones, emails and texts. This is very possible - and if so I am sure Ozuna sent a few texts, or made a few phone calls which will sink a lot of people

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

I have a question, if Ozuna says after questioning, that she worked the mail in vote for other candidates besides Ernie Hernandez in the last county election, and got paid by the candidates to do so, are those candidates in trouble?

BobbyWC said...

Great question - the answer is no.

Not everything the politiqueras do with the mail ballots is illegal - it would be nearly impossible to prove that a particular candidate knew a particular politiquera would break a specific law. They can only be proven through text messaging, phone taps, emails - unless the candidate is a chief organizor then it would be easier.

In the Medrano case in Dallas I believe it was a niece who testified against the uncle (candidate) that he personally told her to falsely register at an address

Bobby WC