Tuesday, October 18, 2011



BISD SEEKS REHEARING ON CLAIM THE APPELLATE COURT MADE A FINDING INVOLVING NONEXISTENT FACTS

"The panel Opinion erred in ignoring undisputed evidence that Superintendent Gonzales was suspended before the Board learned of the protected speech and the district court dismissed the retaliation claim over the action Gonzales took before he was suspended"

Here is the Motion for Rehearing En Banc

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/99825774/juarezRehearing

An interesting side note is, Presas-Garcia claims she and the Board seek to work with ACE insurance, but now that ACE identifies a key factual flaw in the Juarez opinion she wants to hang ACE insurance.  Presas-Garcia cannot seem to make up her mind.  Pinocchio looks innocent compared to this lady.

If what ACE is arguing is true, the En Banc panel will dismiss the claims against the trustees, without ever having to get to the question of law on qualified immunity.

Back to the landfill

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

It now remains to be seen what BISD will do since Dr. Atdinson has hire her brother. I hope a teacher that has been placed in the "pool" and is qualified files due to EEOC being violated.

Anonymous said...

If ACE recommended the Settlement for Rendon's case and is requesting him be employed by the district, why is the district paying to keep him on the payroll instead of ACE. If ACE is truly recommending employing him at the district and ACE is responsible for all claims after the deductible, shouldn't ACE be paying for his employment instead of the school district?

BobbyWC said...

The truth is going to come out and it will be the taxpayers are picking a lot up because of the corruption

Bobby WC