Tuesday, August 16, 2011


PRESAS-GARCIA AND LONGORIA GIVE NEW MEANING TO STUPID - AND IS THEIR CONVICTED DRUNK MOUTH PIECE A SOCIOPATH OR JUST SO DESPERATE FOR MONEY HE WILL PUBLISH ANY LIE HANDED TO HIM, OR WORSE DOES HE LIE JUST FOR SPORT WITHOUT COMPENSATION?

In what any idiot can see, Montoya at Presas-Garcia and Longoria  request printed a bogus story about Jim Hunter and their concerns over his appointment as counsel to mediate the Rendon lawsuit.

REALITY CHECK

These morons think all they have to do is say Cavasos and all of a sudden Brownsville will unite against Cavasos. This is delusional thinking which raises serious questions about Presas-Garcia's and Longoria's ability to function at any level when intelligence is required.

THE FIRST LIE

BISD can settle the Rendond lawsuit for a billion dollars and it will have nothing to do with Cavasos or have any impact on Cavasos. There is no conscience there. Montoya lies because the concept of integrity or the truth eludes him.

Second, BISD has already spent the $50,000 deductible. This means 100% of any settlement will come from the insurance company. Nothing will come from BISD or the taxpayers. So this idea only the lawyers will win is bogus. That is the nature of litigation. You do not settle to avoid paying attorneys fees. If you know the plaintiff has no case you take the case to trial. Rendon's claims are bizarre and will go nowhere at trial.

BISD no longer uses the insurance company which is defending the Rendon, Juarez, or Presas-Garcia lawsuits. Because of these lawsuits and the Gonzales litigation which went no where, the insurance company raised the deductible to an amount BISD could not afford. BISD just several months ago switched to an insurance company which was willing to keep the deductible at $50,000.00

WHO IS JIM HUNTER

Montoya the consummate liar never mentions that the Texas Ethics Commission sanctioned Escobedo because of a conspiracy between Jim Hunter and Escobedo to conceal the fact Escobedo illegally used BISD campaign money to announce is candidacy for county commissioner. Jim Hunter in the ad claimed he paid for it. He did not. The money illegally came from Escobedo's BISD account.

www.ethics.state.tx.us/sworncomp/2009/290235.pdf

If Jim Hunter was willing to engage in illegal conduct for Enrique Escobedo once, why would he not do it again?  I will be copying the documents to General Counsel for the insurance company.  They need to know they are being set up.

Montoya's entire post had as its stupid purpose Longoria and Presas-Garcia trying to make it appear they are concerned with Jim Hunter when in fact they are 100% behind the appointment.

REALITY CHECK

Legally, BISD cannot request a particular attorney without the consent of the Board.  Dr. Montoya or counsel would then inform the insurance company of the request.  BISD had no such vote on the issue.  This would mean Dr. Montoya is acting without Board authority.  I believe this is what Aguilar is talking about.  I will be asking General Counsel to demand proof that Dr. Montoya has authority to make the request concerning the appointment of Jim Hunter.  If Jim Hunter has as half a brain he will reject the  request.  If the evidence shows Dr. Montoya is acting without legal authority Jim Hunter could have his law firm sued.  My letter to General Counsel for the insurance company will be copied to the Managing Partner of Jim Hunter's law firm.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, Well, Well, they are up to no good again! It seems they like to get together and plan out their actions. It appears that yesterday morning they were at "El Torito" restruant planing their next move on the distict. The 3 amigas could be heard speaking about their future requests for moves at BISD. People listen up; when you spot these 3 amigas pull out your recorder, because you will catch them talking about BISD. All you need to do is say "Hello" to them and you are part of their conversation. Come on Brownsville get to work; if you want to fix this wreck of a board.

Anonymous said...

isn't that an illegal quorum?

BobbyWC said...

3 does not make a quorum; guys I will not publish through comments with allegation as to Presas-Garcia without proof - I rejected the story on the care until I had first hand evidence and even now I am not making any assumptions; as to Rick Zayas he is not a public figure and I have yet to see any document which links him to wrongdoing - and yes you say my three readers - so with you it makes 4 - and if the BV has no readers why then would you care if I print a story which according to you no one will read anyway -= idiot

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

It seems like they have alot of envy towards Cavazos!

Anonymous said...

Way to tell them Bobby, Way to tell them, LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL.....

Anonymous said...

Somebody must be getting a little concerned about what you are reporting, Bobby.

Thanks and keep it up.

Anonymous said...

The 3 amigas are not smart enough to know that they are being watched. I cannot believe that Dr. C.L.S. allows herself to be seen having breakfast with Presas-Garcia and Longoria. Thought she was smarted than that, or at least she pretends to be. Just Saying.....

Anonymous said...

Bobby, if 100% of any settlement comes from the insurance company, does that mean that the taxpayers are off the hook?

BobbyWC said...

yes, except for the $50,000 deductible which has already been paid -

BISD can settle without the insurane company and then the taxpayers will be on the hook - this is why they want to change attorneys - they want someone who will pressure the insurance company to pay

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

So if the board members want to they can settle without the insurance company , and the taxpayers will then bite the bullet? Or maybe the Board could try to offer them their jobs back or they get nothing?

Anonymous said...

Hopefully people will be able to make well informed decisions at the polls for the 2012 school board elections. BV has done a remarkable job informing its readers about what is happening.

Anonymous said...

A doctoral degree does mean you are any smarter. It is just piled higher and deeper! She obviously believes that since she is better educated than the other two she can lead them to drink from her toilet full of BS, and MS and PHD.

Anonymous said...

Did anything interesting happen in Federal Court today regarding BISD pending lawsuits?

Anonymous said...

yeah the judge denied the Motion for summary judgement, Rendon won big. Ps for the record the three amigas opposed the appointment of Hunter. Not their doing try Colunga and Cavazos.

BobbyWC said...

denial of a motion for summary judgment is meaningless - it means the judge sees a fact question for a jury - you do not win until you win - the case will now be appealed - such as Antonio Juarez case was appealed - Juarez caase has been on appeal more than long enough for the court to affirm the trial court. the appellate court is writing a long and complex opinion - I do not know the result but the longer it takes on appeal the worse it normally is for the plaintiff. This court of appeals routinely issues 1 or 2 page opinions simply saying the trial court did a great job and its opinion is affirmed. The time for such an opinion has long passed

In the end a denial of summary judgment is meaningless - it can be on a quetion of law or fact - the court of appeals will now decide if the trial court got it right

Bobby WC