Friday, April 22, 2011


JESSICA TETREAU CLAIMS SECURITY CAMERA WATCHING HER

If this is part of the campaign, it brings this campaign to the same level of those who filmed Cisneros. I have no idea what the legality of any of this is - only time will tel.

http://www.facebook.com/brownsville.cheezmeh#!/photo.php?fbid=115081318573444&set=a.107868902628019.16332.100002147306783&type=1&theater

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where is this camera watching her.

BobbyWC said...

I have no idea - I am just reporting the claim

also guys I rejected a post with speculation as to who is responsible for the camera

This is an ongoing story - you will not all I am reporting is the claim without an opinion

This is not complex if the owner of the property where the camera was placed is a victim he/she can authorize the police to take the camera - they can trace the serial number to the owner through the waranty

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Maybe the Chief and some of the Police officers might be in with Charlie?

Anonymous said...

Who is motivated enough to stoop to this level of pitifulness?

BobbyWC said...

At this point there i no evidence as to who put the camera there and why - and speculation as to who put it there is not helpful to the discussion.

It is up to Jessica to get the owner of the property to say if he/she put it there and if not will the owner of the proerty call for a criminal investigation - until then there is no proof that Jessiva was even teh target of the cameras

Bobby Wc

Anonymous said...

Your missing the point where is the location of the camera and what will it disclose?

Anonymous said...

I HAVE A CAMERA AT MY PROPERTY BUT IT DOES NOT POINT TO MY NEIGHBORS SIDE.

BobbyWC said...

No carlito you are missing the point - Sossi fully vetting jessica on this issue - the law is pretty black and white.

On this identical issue I defended John Loza before a Dallas grand jury - the grand jury no-billed him and he went on to become a city commissioner.

Sossi has looked at her driver's licence, certified mail - etc , just because you ex-wife does not want you anywhere near her does not mean Jessica's estranged husband and her cannot work together when it comes to the kids - she has an absolutely right to visit when she chooses -

She does not need your's or Sorry Charlie Atkinson's permission

Bobby WC

BobbyWC said...

i am not going to dislcose the full security I have in front of my house - but it is my right and if it catches my neighbor coming out of her house I am sorry - but if it is true the police are looking into it in 5 minutes they can learn the owner of the camera - I have an idea who ownes the camera - if in fact bad conduct is involved - If i am right people will finally see just how bad politcs is in Brownsville

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Hope BobbyWC allows hypotheticals: What if a vendor with a contract with the city installed the camera at the request of a commissioner? That's legal, right?


Jaime

BobbyWC said...

I have no idea if it is legal - but again we have no proof at this time that this was anything other than the owner of the property putting in a security camera

But I will say - if under this hypothetical it was done without the consent of the property owner - it would be highly illegal.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Does the camera show that Jessica lives there that would be the real story committing perjury in her bid to become Commissioner District 2 when she actually lives in District 3.

BobbyWC said...

There is still no evidence the camera was intended to focus on Jessica. Furtehr the camera showing jessica visiting her estranged evidence is not evidence she lives there.

Until there is evidence of who put teh camera here and why it was put there everything is speculation.

But on where she lives Sossi has already made that call. Like I said I represented a John Loza before the grand jury in a similar case - the law is clear if her license shows she lives in the distrist and receives important mail in the district the case is done. It is my understanding thatSossi has already reviewd the evidendce and found under the case law she is fine. So good luck getting the DA to prosecute given the law

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

If the footage shows that Jessica has spent one day two days three days four days consecutively living there it should raise questions on whether or not she lives with her husband or lives with her mom. Wouldn't that raise questions as to her standing to run as Commissioner District 2 when she really lives in District 3I find that to be questionable.

BobbyWC said...

If the camera shows she is living there then she has problems -

I am one of evidence - the only known evidence at this time is Sossi looked to her license and mail and other factors and concluded she lives with her mother -

until there is clear evidence otherwise this is all BS

It is BS to be saying she lives with her estranged husband when there is no evidence of it and it is BS to complain about the camera

Assuming Atkinson had something to do with the camera in my opinion he has every right to investigate her claims of where she lives.

At this point with Atkinson having failed to produce one piece of evidence to date she is lying - he is coming across as desperate. the camera issue has been known long enough at this point that any footage to prove she lives with her estranged husband should have long been posted on the internet.

But also Jessica's use of the camera that she is a victim is also pure BS - she has yet to produce any evidence she was the target of the camera

I think both sides are playing desperate and if I lived in the district about this point I would be turned off by both sides

Bobby WC