Friday, May 21, 2010

IS IT POSSIBLE THAT JUAN MONTOYA HAS A HARD TIME WITH REALITY AND FACTS? - THE TRUTH ABOUT THE QUINTANILLA HEARING IN THE ZAYAS CASE

Judge Alejandro like the self-made eunuch he celebrates himself to be recused himself from the case. At no time did Alejandro dismiss the motion, as alleged by Montoya. He never got to it. In proper parlance the language would be “Denied the Motion.”

Quintanilla continues to suffer delusions of grandeur . In the Motion Zayas' and Cortes' counsel never asked that Quintanilla be placed in jail and taken away in handcuffs. He knows Montoya will never investigate the facts so he lies - the true characteristic of a con artist.

I am attaching the Motion herein which was filed by Zayas’ and Cortes’ counsel. I trust my readers to read it for themselves and to make up their own mind.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/39544540/QUNTANILLA

My readers do not need to be told what lies they need to believe. I will always trust my readers to look to the verifiable facts and make up their own mind. Anyone can go to the end of the above document and see no where in the proposed order was anyone asking Quintanilla be taken away in handcuffs.

As to Quintanilla’s great march in Dallas - he did not lead it - as is always the case he takes credit for other people’s work.

“The four co-organizers – Domingo Garcia, Carlos Quintanilla, Diana Flores and Beatrice Martinez – represent diverse constituencies. All did not agree with each other, but all worked for the greater good of the community.”

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-martinez_10edi.State.Edition1.2316135.html

Knowing Domingo Garcia the way I know him, a sweet heart to no one, he had to really contain himself to be able to participate in these meetings with Quintanilla. As the article points out the march was the work of a lot of organizations putting aside their differences for the better good of the community. It seems as is always the case, Quintanilla must take credit for the work of others. How many times does he get to con the people before Montoya will denounce him - answer there is no limit.

None of this means Zayas and Cortes are not guilty of something - but one must ask - why is Quintanilla refusing to produce any evidence of his claims? - answer he has none. This is sad because Zayas and Cortes are not suing him for money they are suing him for their campaign ads. “Quintanilla thrown out of court for a lack of evidence.” It is so obvious what is happening I sometimes joke to myself and ask myself is Zayas and Cortes paying Quintanilla to effectively help them clear their names?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Correct me if I am wrong:

Attornies get a pool of money, choose one among them to be a judge.

EX. Euresti, D. Gonzalez, Leal, Alejandro, Cornejo-Lopez, etc, etc, etc.

And the corruption continues....