Wednesday, April 21, 2010

JUAN MONTOYA GOES OFF DEEP END AGAIN -

(Editor's note: Juan Montoya is stating Hernandez paid him $100.00, for an ad and that is it - nothing more. Look people this is a game, although I do like his diatribe against DPM. I have said before and will say again - there is nothing new in people being paid to write in support of one side or another. You know it may be something as simple as Montoya did the piece against Peña, which was truthful and accurate, because he remains upset at Peña over the Gonzales mess - it probably has nothing to do whatso ever with Hernandez. Until someone has proof that Montoya accepted more than $100.00 for a simple ad then that is all there is. Less we forget McHale took money from Solomen Ortiz and Arambula. This is why I think this is all a game to make fools of the people. If Montoya were really mad at DPM he would give up his address so he can finally be served in the lawsuit.)

One last added issue - I do not like people telling lies about me - I have never deposed Juan Montoya - as it comes to legal issues, again, I think it may be a matter of Montoya having no knowledge of the legal system. Being crossed examined at a hearing is not a deposition.)

Let me begin with a truthful statement about morality in today’s society - the difference between a whore and a lawyer is, a whore has the integrity to admit who and what she is. In virtually every profession today morality plays no role in how people conduct themselves. Journalism in the U.S. is a three ring circus - a minstrel show where minorities have no meaningful place at the table. The idea that a story has been bought and paid for is not newsworthy - defending the act is newsworthy. D Magazine has long been known for printing stories paid for by the profiled person.

I will never fault a man for trying to support his family. I will fault a man who consistently lies, defames people, and shows not an ounce of shame for how he lives his life. It would be easier to live with the amoral Juan Montoya if he at least had the integrity to admit to who and what he is - it is the denial which offends people. It is the defending of the politiquera system which offends people.

I find it laughable that a thing which for a living writes smut which has the demeaning of women as its core purpose, now feels qualified to denounce someone who writes for money. We all know DPM will defend the boy who posts to the internet comments about his daughter which treats his daughter exactly how he treats women. Guys, this is feigned shock and commentary- it is a game to make fools of the people of Brownsville.

I do not actually have a great problem with Montoya being a paid hack for Hernandez - I actually trust people to look at a source, measure the person’s integrity and then decide accordingly whether or not they are trustworthy. People who find a paid hack to be credible are not interested in facts or reason - they are going to believe what makes them happy - which is why facts and reality play no role in their decision making. This is why many of the Teabaggers are so dangerous.

I do not know if Juan Montoya is just plain stupid or a sociopath - either way his credibility is non-existent. I have defended Robert Sanchez of late claiming he was played by Montoya and McHale - I believe this to be true - I hope he can now see just how played he was and how it hurt his reputation and family.

First some fact checks - on Monday the court will not decide if there are enough mail ballots to be tossed out. Montoya either has no interest in researching the facts or lies. From his blog.

“There will be a hearing Monday to hear out Peña's motion to declare enough mail-in votes void so that he can win the election.”

No election contest has been filed. The issue is to preserve the mail-ballots. I will be the first to say I am not happy one bit with how Peña is proceeding. This is not how to proceed. By this point he should have reviewed the mail-ballots and filed the election contest. He has not. In my view this does not bode well for getting to the truth.

Juan Montoya is so stupid and such a pathological liar it boggles the mind. First Juanito Panito - the law says that if the person about whom you speak can be identified in the statement it matters not that you do not mention them by name. The following statement you posted about me becomes further evidence of your obsession with my personal life and your homophobia.

“Now everyone from Peña, a pro-Peña blogger, a would-be greasy-spoon gonzo "journalist," and a staunch (if not indignant) defender of alternative sexual preferences are up in arms over the fact that this system exists. Where were they when Rick Zayas demolished Lehman with a multitude of mail-in votes?

Was it all right then because they supported the winner?”

Let’s deal with two facts - not that facts matter to Juan Montoya - I have consistently denounced the use of politiqueras by every candidate. I have detailed my reasoning why Villalobos will block every investigation - the politiques have him blackmailed.

As to the Zayas Lehmann election - first, I questioned whether or not Zayas even knew students attended BISD. Being anti-Lehmann is not being pro Zayas. I have made clear over and over again, while the discharge of Gonzales was justified, the motivation was retaliation. I have made clear that everyone should vote against Zayas and Cortez for their support of Superintendent Springston and Director over Special Services Kathleen Jimenez. But since facts do not matter to Juan Montoya, let’s try the election returns in the Zayas/Lehmann election

From the Brownsville Herald: Position 4 (2 year term)
1. Richard 'Rick' Zayas - 19,922
Pat Lehmann - 9,392
http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/dem-91442-pct-constable.html

Yes Juanito Panito Zayas won the election on the mail-ballots - some 10,000 of them. As to me being a Peña supporter, the facts are on my blog for everyone to read. I agreed with Montoya that the estate case made Peña look very unethical. In fact I said I would have been a lot more hard hitting. In fact I posted the court of appeals decision so people could read for themselves just how egregious the facts were. Juanito Panito this is not evidence of me supporting Peña. Further, on more than one occasion I asked people to vote a blank ballot in the election. The fact of the matter is, if enough people followed my recommendation, my blog may have cost Peña the election.

http://brownsvillevoice.blogspot.com/2010/03/is-association-with-herald-association.html

Here is another reality check for Juanito Panito - every time you post anti-gay statements against me and verifiable lies, I get to use them in court to impeach your credibility.

A final word - this is just my opinion and based on nothing but my personal view of McHale, DPM and Montoya. It is not based on any specific facts - again this is pure 100% conjecture on my part.

This entire dog and pony show they are putting on about Montoya is just that - It is not real. It is a play to make fools of the people of Brownsville. There is no doubt in my mind these guys are still hanging out and laughing about this entire dog and pony show. This is how they play people.

In closing let me say this - there is nothing illegal in what Juan Montoya is doing. He writes for money - an American institution as old as time. At least he did not hide his write for hire status like Roman Perez. As to the bullshit about the TaxID issue - DMP tried to get me to post a comment on the issue. He is either stupid or trying to entrap me into an argument which is bogus. A self employed person only needs their ssn to do business.

5 comments:

BobbyWC said...

guys I am not going to publish through defamtory statements -

I hate that people cannot separate out issues - it would have been very bad journalism for Montoya to not go with the Peña stories - they were accurate and newsworthy - evey paper in ths country takes money for campaign ads and then runs negative stories on the candidates.

in my view the only amoral issue is how he has responded to the issue - lies about me and others never work - I would never do what he did, but every newspaper in the county does what he did - the criticism on the Peña story is bs - the complaints over how he has handled the situation are valid

BobbyWC said...

guys I am not going to publish through defamtory statements -

I hate that people cannot separate out issues - it would have been very bad journalism for Montoya to not go with the Peña stories - they were accurate and newsworthy - evey paper in ths country takes money for campaign ads and then runs negative stories on the candidates.

in my view the only amoral issue is how he has responded to the issue - lies about me and others never work - I would never do what he did, but every newspaper in the county does what he did - the criticism on the Peña story is bs - the complaints over how he has handled the situation are valid

Anonymous said...

ACCURATE? So, then, why did you write this in your April 12 post: "As to Montoya's pathetic response to the complaints he is a hired hand of Hernandez -I defy Montoya to post any specific findings (not accusations) against Peña. This is the standard he used as to why he is not publishing anything against Hernandez. As to Hernandez, I know what I know - he looked me in the face and said he would not hire politiqueras to work the mail ballots and then he did - he lied to my face." Tsk, tsk, tsk.

BobbyWC said...

Obviously you do not know the difference between facts and allegations - everything claimed against Peña are alelgations not facts - no court every found them to be true - the allegations reported by Montoya were consistent with the allegations made in court, which made them newsworthy and accurate.

It is no longer an allegation Hernandez works the mail ballots - he himself has now established this as a fact.

Anonymous said...

Good article mr. editor, this gives me a different perspective on the war of words, I say, cut it out, a couple of cold glasses of wine and back to being buddies.