Wednesday, April 16, 2008

IT IS TIME WE EXPOSE THESE PERVERTS AND THEIR Ménage Trois, SANCHEZ, McHALE, and JMONTOYA, and ZAVALETTA, VALADEZ, VILLALOBOS, and PUT THE AGENDA OF THE PEOPLE FIRST

I was not going to comment on this, but I grow tired of bullshit - paid whore politics. The people have suffered enough at the hands of people like McHale and JMontoya. It is time these whores for the privileged classes and corruption be exposed as the paid whores they are. I do not know if this JMontoya is a real person, but as a whore for corruption and fucking the people over for the right price, the man’s ass, such as McHale’s, is high in the air demanding action. Sanchez and his whores, because everyone knows only people being paid by Sanchez with money, alcohol or food give him the time of day, are promoting this notion that former Mayor Eddie Trevino cost the BPUB in $58.590.00, in attorney’s fees. Here is a radical notion, had Sancho Panza Sanchez not been born a moron and raised by a father who believes he is above the law and never met a person who was not subject to his personal abuse, he never would have violated the law, and the BPUB never would have been sued, and the BPUB would not now be caught holding the cost of the litigation caused solely by Sancho Panza Sanchez. Here is another radical idea, maybe it is time the BPUB sued Sancho Panza Sanchez to recover the attorney’s fees he cost the BPUB by breaching his duties to the BPUB by supporting the violation of the law.

I have said time and time again, there is no greater threat to our democracy than the judiciary. Sancho Panza Sanchez blames the judiciary for his failure to get away with breaking the law. If Sancho Panza Sanchez really cared about the community on this issue, which he does not, he would have put up the money needed for a vigorous appeal. He did not. He simply allowed the taxpayers to pay the price for his corruption. He learned this tactic from his father.

If we all remember the father abandoned an oil rig in the ship channel in Freeport, causing the taxpayers by and through the state to intervene to pick up the costs.
http://thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=3842672e51b6fe92 Now it is my understanding the state was finally able to find someone to remove the rig in exchange for its salvage value, but this does not change the fact the Sanchez family was prepared to allow the taxpayers to pay the cost of cleaning up yet another Sanchez family mess.

http://houston.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2008/01/21/story8.html (an internet search has revealed no information on the current status of the criminal case against Emilio Sanchez - if the Sanchez family has an update which vindicates Emilio Sanchez, I will certainly post it as a separate post so the people have the full story)

McHale and JMontoya, like the well paid whores they are, well knowing Sanchez he probably gave each a bottle of cheap whiskey and 6 free meals at his eatery, they defended Cris Valadez in the theft of electricity charges from the BPUB. This man was a Board Member and he does not know enough about the process to know that if you use electricity you get a bill. Why did he not report to the BPUB he was not receiving a bill from the BPUB? But Valadez knew that he had the hopelessly corrupt Zavalettas and Villalobos to protect him. Did Zavaletta ever demand an investigation into the theft charges against Valadez? When I called Zavaletta on this issue, he threatened to sue me. No - you cannot call for an investigation into a man who is part of your closeted perversions to screw the people for your own personal gain and self glorification. What a Ménage Trois, Zavaletta, Valadez, and Villalobos. One must ask if someone’s failure to perform properly in this Ménage Trois, was the source of the mudslinging during the DA’s race. Yes, I am talking in terms of perversion, but this entire thing is perverse. It is time we speak of it instead of always being polite without regard for the ramifications of our silence.

This is not the first time McHale is selling himself to the highest bidder. He does not dispute, because he cannot, that he covered for Martin Arambula, and his demands for special privileges with the City of Brownsville, while merely a candidate for the Port Commission. At the time, he was taking money from Arambula’s campaign to advertise the campaign on El Rocinante. This worthless piece of shit then complains when the Herald does the same thing. Just how stupid can the people be to believe a word which spews from this piece of shit’s mouth. He endlessly complains about the Cardenas family and their privileges, but speaks nothing about the Sanchez family when they engage in the same conduct. The difference is payment or settling a personal score.

When it comes to McHale every opinion he has is about settling a score or is bought and paid for with drink and food. There has never been an honest, unbought, opinion spewed from this piece of shit’s mouth. McHale, you want to continue to fuck the people over based on who is and is not paying you, you will do it from heretofore with knowledge that all of your double standards will be exposed to prove everything which spews from your perverted lips is bought and paid for by someone who has nothing but contempt for the people. McHale and JMontoya, when it comes to Sanchez, are your standards so low you can receive joy from his Vienna sausage. How emotionally disturbed must a man be, to advertise his joy in being Sanchez’s bitch. McHale and JMontoya , you are both so full of shit the stench of your arrival is known two hours in advance.

Now McHale how about challenging me on the facts. We both know you cannot, which is why all you ever have to offer is non-specific vulgar perversions spewed in support of whomever is paying for your fix on any given day. Do not try the distraction game, because one mistake and you will not be able to face even your drunken friends at the bar. Take me on based on my facts as alleged.

Sancho Panza Sanchez, it is time I retire. So I suggest you proceed with caution. You would be amazed with what I know. I am unimpressed with you, your-two-bit crooked father, and your lawyers - so make one mistake - just one - and when I am done with you in court the settlement will not be a penny less than 5 million. Remember Sancho Panza - I am coming after you and your two-bit whores- proceed with extreme caution, or be prepared to write a large check.

It is time we expose these perverts and their Ménage Trois, Sanchez, McHale, and JMontoya, and Zavaletta, Valadez, Villalobos, and put the agenda of the people first. I would love to meet the women married to these pieces of shit. How do they not see just how destructive these pieces of shit are to our communities, families and children.

For the last piece of pornography posted by McHale, I am removing his web link. I have been emotionally bothered since I saw it and cannot seem to reconcile my opposition to censorship, and belief that the federal law on the issue needs to be met. A community blog is not a place for pornography. Shame on google for refusing to enforce federal law on the issue, but then google is about money, and not the people.

This brings home, just how perverted Sancho Panza Sanchez is - what kind of parent gets in bed with a man who would put such pornography on the internet for his 4 year old son to see? The same man who for his own personal gain puts pictures of his crying son on the internet. A severely emotionally disturbed man who is devoid of any sense of morality and whose personal obsession with himself makes him a sociopath. What kind of mother accepts this type conduct in her husband? Someone who thinks children being exposed to pornography on the internet is acceptable. Shame on both Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez for being so self-absorbed that they turn a blind eye to their children (and the communities’ children - since when has a Sanchez ever cared about the community) being exposed to pornography by a man who is bought and paid for by Sancho Panza Sanchez. Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez’s position on this issue is simple - "McHale, you do our dirty work, and we will say nothing about you exposing our children and the communities' children to pornography."

To Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez - you people are perverted pigs. Oh please - I do not want to hear about innocent Lorrie Ann. She puts up with it for the money - it is about the money - Time to call a spade a spade. Honorable decent women all over this country go into poverty every day and walk away from husbands like Sancho Panza Sanchez to protect their children. What makes the priviledged Lorrie Ann Sanchez better than these honorable women who prefer poverty over supporting a husband who supports exposing children to pornography. Nothing - it is about money. Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez were made for each other. I just feel sorry for their children.

To anyone defending Lorrie Ann, I will say this - when your child comes home and tells you how he/she saw pornography on El Rocinante - remember you are the parent who turned a blind eye. Your excuses today are your child's perversions and social problems tomorrow. I grow so bored with people "Oh I met her she is the nicest person in the world." I only know what I know - in exchange for her husbands money she turns a blind eye to children being exposed to pornography - and that is a fact all of you excuse makers.

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Now, tell us how you really feel.

:)

Patricia A.

BobbyWC said...

Thank you for your tamed response -today at physical therapy I got greatr reviews for my comments - most people are as fed up as I am

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

wuwt?

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

Congrats on being able to fit all of your points into one post!

I may not agree with your perception of Mrs. Sanchez in part because she is a private citizen and should not be touched in my opinion. This goes in hand with how I privately felt the wife of Mr. John Shergold should not have been so viciously attacked in his race to unseat his entrenched incumbent opponent.

I will agree that keeping pornography away from children should occur in households.

V

BobbyWC said...

RGV,

Normally, I would say that the spouse if off limits - but when a spouse knows her husband is promoting conduct which is dangerous to children, and she remains silent she is part of the problem.

The issue of the children changes everything - especially when dealing with a women who remains silent and just takes the money her husband throws at her in exchange for her silence.

Look at Sanchez's response - - he brags about trying to buy a porn magazine for a friend in the hospital, but he could not because the regular place where he buys his porn no longer carries it.

Rather than reason why he should not be linked to McHale - he makes clear porn is something to laugh about.

I am not bad mouthing porn - Porn has its benefits - it makes refraining from sex until you find that special someone easier. But this was not the moment to brag about it. I can her Lorrie Ann's friends laughing at the fact her pathetic husband has to buy porn to be satisfied - I would never ever do that to a man I was being intimate with.

Morality is not about what the Pope claims to be moral. Morality is about speaking out against facilitating the exposing of porn to children.

Morality is about knowing that just because I could go into the gay chatroom tonight and in a half-hour have an 18 year kid in my bed on a false promise of taking care of him, I don't do it. Getting sex is easy - but not at the price of sacrifing right from wrong. That is a moral compass. I would not even consider dating anyone under 40.

When a wife fails to speak out against a husband engaged in conduct which is injurious to children she is as guilty as her husband. No excuses - what does she care more about - being shamed or money? The answer will tell you something about her character.

Anonymous said...

::APPLAUSE::

I usually don't agree with much of what you say, but the majority of this article is gold. Dead on, BWC.

We now call on other bloggers like Melissa Zamora and Chris Davis to follow suit and denounce these folks and their dirty shenanigans.

::APPLAUSE::

BobbyWC said...

I have been getting great reviews outside the home - people in Brownsville find all of these people to be basically bores and self-serving.

I will say this- MZ removed El Rocinante several weeks ago over the adult content issue. CD has never recognized the existence of El Rocinante - but I doubt he will every agree Villalobos is a problem child

Remember I am the no sacred cows blogger - I equally offend

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

Why do you say that the wife just stays quite because of the money? Is she easily manipulated by the almighty dollar?

Would it not be possible for a man like Mr. Sanchez to have found love from this woman? And that she has reciprocated that love? Isn't marriage about love not convenience?

I can understand the antics of Mr. Sanchez because he finds closeness with his friends even to cheer them up in the hospital with porn. But to blame the wife because she allows his "childish" behavior may not be fair to her.

Undoubtedly, you may have heard some of the rumors of Mrs. Sanchez, but I will not stoop so low as to repeat them here. I have not found any merit in those rumors. I will, however, continue to say that she should remain off-limits. We will disagree on this point I am sure, Mr. BWC.

Forgive me for using you as an example Mr. Davis, but since he has a blog and has been present at the most recent city commission meeting let us assume that he is a public face. And let us further assume he is childish, which other than using the phrase "GoodTime", he is not. Would you then be so quick to blame his wife for allowing his childish behavior?

I would not, but then again, I am a simpleton.

V

BobbyWC said...

You have completely missed the point, as described in your discussion of CD.

First and most importantly - I have no doubt she is deeply in love with him - I would never question that.

I am in the process of ending a relationship with someone I deeply love, but there are personality issues which I cannot overcome - so it is time to move on- (for the record it is non-sexual)

one has nothing to do with the other.

I do not know how to respond to equating facilitating access to porn to minors with your example of CD using the term GTC. I just do not see anything in common between the two

I have no expectations of Sanchez - he will always be petty and childish - but promoting something or someone who provides easy access to porn to minors is not childish - it is reckeless disregard for children, and family.

BobbyWC said...

You have completely missed the point, as described in your discussion of CD.

First and most importantly - I have no doubt she is deeply in love with him - I would never question that.

I am in the process of ending a relationship with someone I deeply love, but there are personality issues which I cannot overcome - so it is time to move on- (for the record it is non-sexual)

one has nothing to do with the other.

I do not know how to respond to equating facilitating access to porn to minors with your example of CD using the term GTC. I just do not see anything in common between the two

I have no expectations of Sanchez - he will always be petty and childish - but promoting something or someone who provides easy access to porn to minors is not childish - it is reckeless disregard for children, and family.

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

I do not believe I have missed your post's point. You believe she should woman up and leave Mr. Sanchez if he does not stop his childish and porn ways. She is an enabler under your belief system.

But you miss my point that you should stay out of their marriage and keep it private. Furthermore, you should not place your morals or ideas of relationships in their place. You may accept leaving a relationship you are in love with but cannot personally stand any longer. Yet, Mrs. Sanchez may love Mr. Sanchez and is willing to put up with his personality. His personality may be what she fell in love with not the money which you insinuate when you say:

"I only know what I know - in exchange for her husbands money she turns a blind eye to children being exposed to pornography - and that is a fact all of you excuse makers."

That is not fair. And just like I supported you in your attack on Mr. Sanchez on Mrs. Zamora's blog, I will support him while you attack his wife on your blog.

I do not believe she is fair game. You are not her friend to be giving your advice to her on her marriage.

I hope you understand my point. I hope you would do me the honor of shutting me up if you felt I was placing my morals on someone else's personal relationship.

Let's have some tequila and call it a night on this spat.

V

BobbyWC said...

Rio Grande - you are still not addressing the issue - I concede that in nearly every situation the spouse is 100 % off limits - we are on the same page on this

But you do not even mention my point - it is her silence while he encourages easy access to pornography for children. Mothers, instinctively protest against this.

I never said and never would argue she should leave him - a friendship is not a marriage - in a marriage the one spouse steps up to the plate and defends the marriage by putting their foot down and ending the abusive conduct.

The State of Texas is looking at romoving over 400 children from their mothers because their mother remained silent to the abuses of the fathers and other men. When it comes to children, in a moral society, you do not remain silent when children are at stake.

Sanchez can be the biggest bore, child in the world - it is no one's business what his wife thinks of him - but when his conduct could cause injury to innocent children, especially children in the community, his wife has a duty to speak out - her failure to speak out will result in her being judged - as it should.

The children change everything

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

I may sound crass in this comment. Please foregive.

But how do you know she is being quite on this issue? Were you not the one who stated that your parents let you drink a sip and learn a bit out the ways of adult life while you were younger?

C'mon man, let the woman be. She may very well want her kids to learn NOT to be like their father. She could want them to HAVE a father. She could want them to LEARN about adult life as a child.

Do you live next door to them and Dr. Garcia on Calle Jacaranda? Just leave the woman alone. Bitch at Bob for allowin' porn 'round his children all you want. But they are the parents. SOMETIMES, the government should step off.

I agree porn is bad around kids, but I am not going to tell them how to raise their children. I do not want you or anyone to tell me how to raise my half-breed child Cheech. We all have our ways.

V

BobbyWC said...

Rio Grande Valley,

This is where this is going to end - you simply refuse to even acknowledge my point.

This is not about them, their marriage or their children - it is about the promoting of a blog which provides easy access to porn to minor children -

I do not care a rats ass about what goes on in their home - I do care about my child seeing the porn - I care about the person surfing the net for a Seafood restaurant in Brownsville, expecially a tourist - they are sitting there innocently and come across his web page.

They see the reference to his favorite blogger - they go to the page and now we have a problem if on that day free flow porn is available - as a parent if that happened to my child - I would be done with Sanchez when his businesses are all shut down and he is homeless.

If for no other reason, Lorrie Ann should be shutting this man down because of the potential injury he is doing to his business. Most people I know are not interested in being redirected to free access porn when research a family friendly restautant.

Again it is about the children in the community and not the Sanchez family and their private life.

Not that reality matters - but people have been done with this post for several days. They only reason they keep on reading it is because of your posts.

I have had nothing but 100% positive responsive on the street and at UTB - I have had many people say they will no longer go to his business over this issue. He indirectly advertises access to the porn on his business web page.

This discussion link is not closed.

BObby WC

Anonymous said...

I have always maintained that the Capt was not suited to be a BPUB board member. You have elaborated on this point very eloquently and impressively! It's refreshing to read some of the same sentiments that I have felt, over the years, from someone else. His shenanigans were intolerable when I worked at BPUB.

He made it a point one time, on the phone, to inform me of his status as a board member and how he was, "up there" (ie, "up" in the chain of command) with all of the big wigs in BPUB. That was his rationale for trying to influence me to side with him on a matter that he had no business intervening in. That particular phone call was only one example of micromanaging that he was involved in. His micromanaging usually came from trying to do a favor for one of his friends. On another occasion, he teamed up with the mad doctor Zavaletta, a fierce bully, to badger a city employee into doing him a favor.

His antics during the board meetings over the years are completely laughable. Like when he suggested that BPUB use money to stock fish in the reservoirs so that citizens have a better variety of fish to eat. Or when he added a "chairman's report" to the beginning of each meeting to ramble on about irrelevant ideas. Or flashing cash and offering to pay for his BPUB issued cell phone.

He has gotten into politics for all of the wrong reasons. And he has not done as good of a job at hiding his real intentions as he thinks.

Don't get me started on Cris Valadez.

There, now I can skip my therapy session for this month.

Former BPUB Employee

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

Now that is a point stated much better. I agree. Some surfing child going to Mr. Sanchez's favorite blog and reading pornographic writing after trying to find a seafood restaurant is unacceptable!

But you must grant my point that one should not judge their marriage. You can still make your point as you finally did without mentioning their marriage for the most part. That was my only concern.

I would never have disagreed with you had you plainly stated your position as you now did. You mixed burdens of sorts by bringing in Mrs. Sanchez.

These individuals whom you say support your thoughts on Mr. Sanchez may already have a predisposition not to like him. I am not one of those people.

There are individuals who have a predisposition not to like you and your rants. I am not one of those people. I can only hope you understand.

I apologize if you thought my not mentioning some acceptance of your premise meant that I was not granting your overall point...Easy access of porn is bad. I never disagreed.

V

Anonymous said...

http://houston.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2008/01/21/story8.html

Here is a more recent story on the oil rig.

BobbyWC said...

I am truly not trying to be difficult, but what part of this is not clear?

"Shame on both Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez for being so self-absorbed that they turn a blind eye to their children (and the communities’ children - since when has a Sanchez ever cared about the community) being exposed to pornography by a man who is bought and paid for by Sancho Panza Sanchez. Bob and Lorrie Ann Sanchez’s position on this issue is simple - "McHale, you do our dirty work, and we will say nothing about you exposing our children and the communities' children to pornography."


I failed a child tonight - I will speak to my failure - I cried all the way home from the movie - I just could not get this abuse child out of my head

Anonymous said...

Mr. BWC,

New friend, I will never speak of this tiff again.

I am sorry to hear of your weeping. I am sure you did the best you could under the circumstances and were probably unable to overcome the failings of our society. Sometimes, there is only so much a human being can do.

And in these times, the Lord above can be of service. I know, it maybe a little to early for Sunday service.

V

Anonymous said...

Oh my goodness. Bobby, why do you keep bashing about children going to El Rocinante website? Why do you bash Google? Shame on you for bashing Google and still using their services for your blog. For the children to go into El Rocinante... there is a consent agreement before entering the blog spot. For the families that do not want others viewing porn.. fucking place an adult blocker in your computer or take an extra step in doing something, Bobby, go fly a kite.

BobbyWC said...

Mr. King not that facts matter to someone like you, but at the time I made that post, there was no block on it - Google imposed the block sometime after,

And if you really cared about reality you would have seen my kids safe link onm webpage which teaaches parents who to put blocks on their web page

facts do matter - unless your a pervert

Bobby WC