Thursday, October 19, 2017



BEN NEECE GOES BULLY WITH HELP OF TONY MARTINEZ STOPPING LONGORIA FROM SPEAKING

Full disclosure.  Someone on Montoya's blog posted this video in a comment.  It is not my work. But it is good work.  I remove all copyright on this so long as I am not blocked from your page.  I have no copyright on the video.  I will not let you post my work, allow people to attack me, and then block me so I cannot defend myself.  If I have access to your page, I release all copyright on my work.  We are waiting to learn if the Supreme Court will hear a key case Wordpress uses to allow for copyright violations.  If Wordpress loses, the lawsuits will flow.

No Ben we the community are fed up with you.  You have changed criminal charges for your friends.  Remember this Ben, the last round you paid your hack to attack me endlessly, the Commission on Judicial Conduct sanctioned you.  You could not stop me with your bulling then, and you will not stop me now.  You, your lover Galonsky and his entitled daughter are in for a battle of your lives.

You embarrassed the City of Brownsville with your conduct at  this meeting.  I hope Cesar, and Rick will join Jessica and sign affidavits confirming her vote, and then find counsel to enforce the vote.  Just because the city secretary failed to do her job does not mean it did not happen. We need an AG opinion on this one.  Ben your time is over in this town.  Hit the road jack.  You are one very sick and disturbed person who uses money to buy influence in social media.

The Sanction against Ben Neece by the Commission on Judicial Conduct

The judge's active participation in the fundraiser also conveyed
the impression that the parent of the recipients of the charitable funds was in a special position to influence the judge and raised questions about the judge's impartiality [Violation of 2B and 4C(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.] Private Warning and Order of Additional

Education of a Municipal Court Judge. (08/23/ 12)

Mary Rey testified under oath you actively worked with convicted felon Carlos Quintanilla to manipulate millions from the children of Brownsville.  You are a low live drug user.  Yes sue me on that one, I have enough people to more than fill the courtroom to verify my comment. Let's go for it Benny boy.

Tony Martinez your son Farther Martinez begs God to forgive you daily. He was a true man of God who did wonderful things for children.  Not you, you aligned with Ben Neece who was part of the million dollar payout from BISD, which denied children what they needed. You are a man without honor or shame.   

Oh Benny my boy, you will be well known by Brownsville.  Leave - we as a city are better than you ever will be.

A CALL FOR HELP

This use to be in the City Charter - Does anyone know where it was moved to.



Section 19. - Investigations by commission.
The commission may investigate the financial transactions of any office or department of the city government, and the acts and conduct of any official or employee.

The question becomes, why does Ben Neece claim a home outside his city district as a Homestead, while as a city commissioner he claims to not live in the district of the home he claims as a Homestead.  Is this defrauding the city of property taxes.

At a minimum the city attorney, LMFAO as if Tony would allow her, needs to ask for an AG opinion on the matter.

It is a crime in Texas to claim a Homestead on a home you do not lie in. When you google fraud and Homestead this is what google shows:

"The Property Tax Assistance Division at the Texas Comptroller of Public ..... on this form, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony."

Yes Ben the people are tired, and you are next to go.



If someone can please photo shop this for me.  I want Abraham Galonsky as the Ringmaster, and Ben Neece and Tony Martinez as the clowns.  Then if the pic below can be imposed next to the clown in blue with Nurith Galonsky's face imposed on the dog.


If another blogger or person in social media wants to do it, I say post it on yours first with an understanding we all will be using it.   I will get the criminal investigation going on the alleged Homestead Fraud.  But I need the pic.  Nurith Galonsky needs to be seen for what she is, a circus clown dog, with her dad as the Ringmaster.

HOW THE CARLOS ELIZONDO CASE WILL PLAY OUT

One thing that upsets judges and lawyers when dealing with me is, I can deconstruct what everyone believes to be an ironclad contract.  There is no such thing as a contract which is ironclad.

THE LAW IS ELIZONDO'S BEST DEFENSE

He did not write the Union By-Laws, so as a matter of law even the slightest confusion or doubt in the By-Laws are are construed against the Union and in favor of Elizondo.

If there is anything in the By-Laws which gave Elizondo any discretion over the money, the case must be dismissed for lack of evidence.  If denied it becomes an issue for immediately appeal.  Void for Vagueness.

When I was told about this last night I asked for a copy of all By-Laws or Rules which would apply.  The caller told me he had not seen anything but was surprised I did not raise the Void for Vagueness issue.

If Elizondo wins this on Void for Vagueness based on everything he knows, he will be retiring off into the sunset with a smile on his face, and the taxpayer the poorer for it.

Saenz better go out and hire the best contract construction lawyer he can find to check the By-Laws for any vagueness on how Elizondo could have used the money. It is better to drop the charges now, than to have them thrown out.

Now if the above becomes iffy for both sides, Elizondo will plead down to a misdemeanor.

WHY HAS BISD BOARD PRESIDENT CESAR LOPEZ NOT CALLED AN EMERGENCY MEETING TO ADDRESS THE CARLOS ELIZONDO MATTER?

I just double checked BISD's web page and there is nothing there for an emergency meeting.  I personally think the most they can do is remove him as Board Vice President.

I know my position is not popular, but in this country we remain innocent until proven guilty.  But something more sinister is happening.  We are now using the criminal process to remove democratically elected officials from office before they are proven guilty of anything. You can believe Carlos Elizondo is as guilty as sin, but until proven guilty it is unpatriotic to remove an elected official from office based on a charge, a charge which when all is done and said is proven false.

But Cesar Lopez should have called an emergency Board meeting for legal counsel on this issue.  It is for Carlos to decide if he wants to stay.  But the Board does have a legal right to reorganize and that may be the best solution.

AND THE WINNER IS. BENJAMIN EURESTI

For now the Judge in the Carlos Elizondo case will be Benjamin Euresti, unless he recuses himself.

The charges are
1.  THEFT PROP<$20K PUB SERV/ELDERLY31.03(f)(1-3)Third Degree Felony08/17/2017
2.  MISAPP FIDUC/FINAN PROP >=$20K<$100K32.45(c)(5)Third Degree Felony08/17/2017
Events & Orders of the Court

The first charge was enhanced from a State Jail Felony to a Third Degree Felony because Elizondo was a public servant. "(f) An offense described for purposes of punishment by Subsections (e)(1)-(6) is increased to the next higher category of offense if it is shown on the trial of the offense that:

(1) the actor was a public servant at the time of the offense and the property appropriated came into the actor's custody, possession, or control by virtue of his status as a public servant.
The same goes to the second charge.  As a public servant the state jail felony was enhanced to a third degree felony.

The punishment options. 2-10 years.
Sec. 12.34. THIRD DEGREE FELONY PUNISHMENT. (a) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years.
(b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000.

Wednesday, October 18, 2017


DID ASSOCIATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOROLA SHOW POOR JUDGMENT IN SETTING BOND IN THE ELIZONDO CASE

It is not disputed that in the 4:33 hour tape Cesar is off on an incoherent rant involving something to do with Sorola.  The BV did not mention it in its coverage because it was somewhat incoherent and convoluted.  It was of zero value story wise.  It is not disputed he is mentioned in the tape concerning some matter with another attorney.. Montoya himself proved Sorola was mentioned.

Judge Elia Cornejo Lopez is also mentioned in the tape extensively with Cesar de Leon pleading with Carlos Elizondo to allow Elia's daughter to retake a test so she can raise her GPA.

What we know for sure is, Sorola knew he was on  the tape.  If Montoya reported on it you can bet the farm Sorola consulted on how to spin it.  The BV did not spin it, the BV just ignored it as not newsworthy.

But now it is.  The FBI has the tape and Sorola as a criminal defense lawyer certainly knew he may be subject to an FBI interview for clarification as to what De Leon was talking about.  This simple fact disqualified him from setting bond on Elizondo.  In law with judges it is about appearances and not actual acts.

Sorola knew Elizondo had been recording people.  The appearance is, which does not have to be fact, Sorola knew he could be called in by the FBI in the tape case, and chose to remain a judge in the Elizondo matter anyway.  The appearance is by setting the bond so low, Sorola fears he too was recorded and wanted to be friendly with Elizondo.  It is about appearance and  the people having confidence in the system.  The confidence was lost the second Sorola failed to recuse himself.

The judges need to look at this incredible lack of good judgment and decide if he can remain in his position.  Sorola's conduct only makes matters worse in the eyes of the public.  The judges failing to act will only ad fuel to the fire.

This by itself more than justifies DA Saenz asking the district court judge to reset bail to the higher amount.  If Saenz failS to do same it sends a message if you are represented by Noe Garza who, effectively got Saenz's nephew a walk in a DWI, Saenz will cut your clients a break.

Tuesday, October 17, 2017


JESSICA TETREAU-KALIFA DID SIGN AN AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING A VOTE ON GIBC

UPDATE:  When I wrote this I did not know the following but it was so obvious Neece was behind the McHale story.  From Montoya "Commissioner Ben Neece asked that the chief of police receive the Tetreau affidavit t see if perjury had been committed by her filing the affidavit to show she had voted."

Jessica what ever Ben is trying to silence you about, call a press conference now in front of the FBI office, tell the truth and then go in the office and demand to be heard by the agent on duty. 

ORIGINAL POST

No one can accuse me of being a defender of Jessica.  She has falsely accused me of criminal conduct towards he and her children.  BUT, McHale's claim of perjury against Jessica is as bogus as it gets.  

When I read it I just dismissed it because I assumed Jerry was just lying about the affidavit.  But now that I have verified there is an affidavit, so what?  Listen to the tape.  Any rational person can be confused by what was happening with the vote. It was a mess.

BUT JESSICA DOES NOT SEE IT

Ben Neece went against her.  Ben Neece no longer needs her, which is why McHale who is tied to Neece at the hip ran the bogus story. McHale never would have run such a story without prodding or at least permission from Neece.

We know based on the FB page that Cesar de Leon is owned by his master Mike Hernandez.   We know he is very close with Ben Neece.  

Poor Jessica cannot see what is happening and implicates herself in Cesar's abusive conduct to include Cesar repeating over and over again that it is he and Jessica who have Carlos Elizondo's back while demanding Carlos pay Cesar $1500.  Mike Hernandez says he wants to clean up Brownsville, but backs Cesar even though this is black and white and clearly heard on the tape.  Mike is just a snake oil salesman who the Herald will never challenge because he pays them too much money.  No difference between the Herald and Montoya, money buys silence.

Ben has betrayed the people and for his agenda gone to the devil's side, and no longer needs Jessica.  It is sad she has no one in her life willing to tell her the obvious.

Finally I want to make clear, just because Cesar kept on saying only he and Jessica had Carlos Elizondo's back all the while they had the audit information, does not mean she knew Cesar was invoking her name in Cesar's attempt to get money out of Carlos.

But she is not very bright and instead of remaining silent like a smart person she chose to defend Cesar.  This could implicate her in the con, whether she intended to or not.

The BV is about the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.  No sacred cows.  But no matter what I personally think of Jessica McHale's piece is pure bullshit and in my opinion sanctioned by Ben Neece to dispose of Jessica or out of fear of prosecution to force her to remain silent about something.   The FBI needs to get her in now to find out everything she knows.  It will not take them long to figure she is easily played, but that will not make what she knows any less truthful.  Yes she has lied in the past.  But on this one I think she is holding back something big, which is why Neece allowed McHale to try and intimidate her on a perjury charge.



THIS IS WHY WE MUST FIGHT BACK AGAINST MIKE HERNANDEZ'S DEFENSE OF CESAR DE LEON AND DISMISSAL OF THE RACIAL SLURS AGAINST TWO FEMALE ADA'S OF AFRICAN DESCENT

When we dismiss the real continued racism against innocent people of African descent people can make bogus calls to the police which get young men of African descent murdered by poorly trained police officers.

I will never again stand for the Flag or the National Anthem so long as people of African descent have to put up with racists like Mike Hernandez, Cesar de Leon and OP1033's Anglo Board.

Cesar I know you are just a puppy who loves to be made to appear important, but it is words like yours which killed this young father.  How you face life every day is beyond me.  How you associate with Mike Hernandez is mind numbing.  But soon enough you will find when Ben Neece and Mike Hernandez no longer need you they will try and intimidate you into silence.  Jessica is learning that lesson right now.  Do you think McHale implicated Jessica with a perjury charge without Ben's consent?

Do the right thing Cesar denounce Ben Neece, and Mike Hernandez for his ad, then resign.  No Cesar you care more about power than you do about the children of this father left without a father because racism won over good morals.



THE BV, JOURNALISM AND NOT THEATRICS WHICH COULD OTHERWISE JEOPARDIZE A GOOD CASE

From YouTube as placed there by the Herald

First and foremost, a DA can indict a ham sand wish as the saying goes.  All we know for sure is an arrest warrant was issued for a felony theft.  Carlos Elizondo is innocent until proven guilty.

The BV has all day stayed away from this story until solid information could be obtained.  But the BV knew by commonsense Montoya was reporting theatrics boarding on obstruction of justice and defamation.

My bias, I trust no one who would hire Noe Garza or Victor Ramirez.  Mr. Elizondo did you forget he basically fell asleep at the wheel on the Raul Salazar case, and then failed to timely seek a hearing on the motion for new trial.  You go Carlos - great choice in a lawyer.  I saw the evidence which was going to be used in the Motion for New trial in the Raul Salazar case, and I believe Raul would have won, and some people could have been charged with perjury.  But Victor failed to set it for hearing and time lapsed and Raul paid the price.

But no matter how much I  disdain these two I would never, such as Montoya did, suggest that they sat by in their office and allowed a client facing an arrest warrant to leave and flee the police.  They would lose their license and possibly themselves face criminal charges.

So I waited until I could get good information.  According to the Herald Carlos Elizondo as alleged by Montoya never fled from his lawyers' offices.  The police did their job and were aggressive in searching him out.  But the claim by Montoya would have people thinking, Elizondo should be denied bond because he is a flight risk.  Well the facts show the opposite as reported by the theatrical driven Montoya.

If you listen to the tape above, it reaches the point that Elizondo's attorneys are threatening to leave the DA's office because no one will come out and detain Carlos Elizondo.  The video clearly shows him waiting patiently with his lawyers for Saenz's staff to get their act together and have Elizondo escorted into the office.  This is not fleeing from his lawyers.  It is the exact opposite.

THE WAY IT WORKS

I will give you my words, but the DA Saenz press release explains what everyone in the field knows to be the truth.  This statement by Montoya was reckless.  "An all-points alert had been issued for Elizondo after he fled from his lawyer Noe Garza's office after being warned that unless he came out and gave himself up officers would storm the building."  All press reports show the alert lasted less then a minute as the police were informed Carlos Elizondo was at the DA's office.  Montoya conveniently leaves this essential fact out of his reporting.





Nothing under minds our democracy more than public corruption by elected and appointed officials.  DA Saenz request for bond was spot on.  He needs to show he is serious about these type charges by taking Luis Sorola's bogus lower bond to the judge assigned to he case and have it raised.  Or will Saenz do what he always does and ignore these low bonds for the politically connected.

Could you imagine Montoya's response had Erin Garcia refused the higher bond Saenz was seeking.  But Sorola gets a pass since he and his wife JP Mary Esther Sorola have Montoya on their payroll.

THE JUSTICE IS IF MARY ESTHER SOROLA GETS AN OPPONENT HER HUSBAND'S ACTIONS IN THIS CASE WILL HURT HER

IF SAENZ FAILS TO DEMAND A HIGHER BOND HE MUST REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THIS CASE

Noe Garza effectively got Saenz's nephew, Victor Garcia off of a second DWI.  This is the same Victor Garcia who walked in a convoluted who's on first previous DWI which left a man on the side of the road to die.  Saenz direct work with Noe Garza to protect Saenz's family taints this entire case, and Saenz needs to remove himself from the case, and the case needs to be transferred to another county to be prosecuted by the DA of that county.

My following comments are supported by the above press release.

His lawyers were probably put on notice to bring him in because an arrest warrant was about to issue.  The warrant goes out and law enforcement does it job.  His lawyers did what lawyers do every day, they took their client to DA Saenz's office.  It is really that simple.  No theatrics.  It is very clear on the video.  But Mike Hernandez is paying Montoya to create these fake pictures of corruption.  I am  not saying Mike directed how the coverage was to be done in this case, I am saying Montoya is doing the job Mike Hernandez hired him to do.  Paint Brownsville as needing major change and Mike Hernandez is the man for the job.

Yes, Carlos may be guilty and should get jail time, but reporting in a theatrical manner which helps his employer Mike Hernandez with is message of mass corruption, is not how you do it.  Carlos Elizondo and his attorneys may want to look at a defamation suit. Mike has deep pockets. The theatrical reporting is consistent with the snake oil Mike Hernandez is trying to sell the community.

Carlos Elizondo's lawyers should move to transfer venue based on the damage Montoya's posting did to the jury pool.  This solves Saenz's conflict by allowing the DA in another county to prosecute the case. While he does not have thousands of individual readers, he claims he does, we have no way of knowing how tainted his theatrical reporting did to Carlos Elizondo's right to a fair trial.

I know how the trolls work.  I am not trying to defend anyone.  Let the process work and the guilty fall.  I would imagine about now Coach Joe Rodriguez is shitting bricks now that every vote by Carlos Elizondo will be carefully reviewed.  Smart money is he issues a resignation saying he needs to devote his time to his defense.  This is a reasonable and fair basis for resignation.

CESAR DE LEON

Cesar is far from out of this.  I can tell you he is under investigation in Austin for repeatedly telling Carlos Elizondo Cesar and Jessica were the ones protecting him.  Cesar on the tape demands $1,500 from Carlos or else.  Well when Carlos refused, Jessica and Cesar started to talk about this audit.

This tape could taint the entire case against Carlos Elizondo.  You are not reading about this on Montoya or McHale's page because Cesar de Leon is Mike Hernandez's boy.  When I saw people making this claim on social media I just ignored it as trolls.  But then I checked Mike Hernandez's OP page and it was true.

I will bet the farm Cesar will also be indicted or given immunity for testimony,  What will Mike Hernandez say about his boy then.  Just law enforcement outsiders from Austin trying to make a good Mexican boy look bad.

NEPOTISM IS NOT A BROWNSVILLE ONLY PROBLEM

My brother who lives in NY and is also fed up with all the lies about corruption in Brownsville as being unique to Brownsville, linked me to this article.

The article says three towns in Nassau county.  That is deceptive to outsiders but understood by people on Long Island.  Each county has townships [ that is the three] then each township has towns within the township.  I grew up in East Meadow which is in the Township of Hempstead in the County of Nassau.  Each township has many towns with separate local governments and school districts.

THE STORY OF MASSIVE NEPOTISM ON WHITE LONG ISLAND WHICH IS WHERE THE POWER LIES

From Newsday:

Nassau County and its three towns say new or strengthened ethics laws will curb nepotism, but more than 100 current or former elected officeholders, high-level appointees and political club leaders — Republican and Democratic — have had at least one family member working in local government at some point since 2015.
Nearly 30 of these officials had at least two relatives on a county or town payroll, and several had three or four, according to an analysis of public records.
Those relatives earn a total of $8 million annually in salary alone.
After a spate of high-profile corruption arrests in recent months, Republican-controlled Oyster Bay and Hempstead towns and Democratic-controlled North Hempstead all passed ethics code overhauls. Anti-nepotism provisions included in those packages seek to restrict the ability of town employees to take part in the hiring, promotion or supervision of relatives.
Nassau has had a similar law since 2007, but officials this year bolstered the powers of the body that reviews potential violations, the county board of ethics."
The article goes on.  You can click above on Newsday for the full story.  Corruption is the rule in NY, and not the exception.


A MAN WHO BELIEVES HIS MILLIONS PUTS HIM ABOVE THE LAW

Mike and his lawyers are looking at sanctions at several levels to include suborning perjury, and delaying the appellate process with out right lies.


HEY MIKE ON REMAND I WILL GET THE SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS YOU SIGNED WITH JOSE ANGEL GUTIERREZ AND JERRY MCHALE, THEY BOTH GO TO THE AMOUNT OF THE SANCTION, AND YOUR ABUSE OF THE COURTS TO SILENCE YOUR DETRACTORS

In this type defamation suit a court must set for hearing to dismiss within 60 days, or issue an order by the judge explaining why her docket does not allow for same and then set it no later than 90 days.  Mike Hernandez's attorneys are on record opposing my order and proposed order that the judge set the matter  for review.  The law says if the judge does not deny the Motion to Dismiss within the allotted time table, then it is denied as a matter of law and the Defendant can take an appeal.

The basis for the Motion to Dismiss is nowhere in the lawsuit does Mike's attorney alleged any words spoken or written by me.  As a matter of law the lawsuit against me fails.  They were given 60 days notice to fix the lawsuit and chose not to, and instead submitted a sworn false statement by Mike to save the lawsuit.  Only problem, the appeal had already been perfected so nothing further could be filed with the trial court. More on that below.

THE APPELLATE COURT WILL REMAND THE CASE FOR SANCTIONS AFTER DISMISSING IT

Texas Civil Practises and Remedies Code 27.009 (2) sanctions against the party who brought the legal action as the court determines sufficient to deter the party who brought the legal action from bringing similar actions described in this chapter."

The case law is pretty clear on this type sanction. One, because on remand attorneys fees are guaranteed I have several high profile law firms to step in to handle the sanctions. They know they will get paid. But this is the best part, I am entitled through discovery all information needed by the court to determine your net wealth so a sanction can be formulated to insure you never bring such a frivolous action again. I figure your lawyers will bill you at least $25,000, if not more to fight this issue in trial court and mandamus to the court of appeals and Texas Supreme Court.

You should have taken my settlement offer of mutual releases.


I ALSO GET THE MCHALE AND GUTIERREZ SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS

These are important because it goes to the extent of your abuse of the legal system.  A sanction of less than $250,000 will not deter you.  And even then I do not believe you will stop.

THE COURT OF APPEALS IS ALSO BEING ASKED TO SANCTION YOU AND YOUR LAWYERS

The brilliant Mr. Hill in response to my Motion to Strike your May 10, 2017, response to my Motion to Dismiss was as follows "However, Cervantes' argument and requested relief are incorrect and improper because his appeal was not perfected." TRAP 28.2 (b) Perfection of Accelerated Appeal. Unless otherwise provided by statute, an accelerated appeal is perfected by filing a notice of appeal in compliance with Rule 25.1 within the time allowed by Rule 26.1(b) or as extended by Rule 26.3."

The trial record and court of appeal record shows the notice of appeal was filed on May 4, 2017.  So it was perfected on May 4, 2017.

But since Mike's lawyers insist on having this improper document before the court [btw it does not matter because they never amended the lawsuit to include statements attributed towards me), I am moving for sanctions for suborning perjury.

As noted yesterday, Mike had the typing monkey post an email from him dated November 17, 2016, stating he would not communicate with me.  I tried to communicate with him through Jose Angel Gutierrez after Mike blocked my email.

But in a sworn statement to the court Mike said in December 2016, I failed to communicate with him.  How, he already had my email blocked and posted a public statement in November he would not speak with me.




Sworn lies are sanctionable.  Guys I have no delusions where Mike and I will be in 10 years on this mess.  He will still be paying Mike Hill, because Hernandez cannot accept failure.

A SIDE NOTE

Mike Hernandez had Montoya threaten litigation by Mike if any one challenged the authenticity of the signatures in his racist petition.  And Mike I know someone using your IP address spent over 20 hours yesterday on my page.  Did you download the entire blog?.  The District Clerk in Fort Worth verified for me that Mike did in fact sue Jose Angel Gutierrez in Fort Worth.

Now remember it was the BV based on claims by Jose Angel that published the story someone associated with Carlos Marin stole his voter registration list created by V3.  This was a final blow for Jose Angel.  Is this why Montoya raised the issue as a basis to threaten litigation by claiming the names did not come from the alleged stolen list?  How would Montoya know where the names came from?  I forget Mike's regular paycheck to Montoya.

WHAT'S NEXT

I just have to do something on my brother's case and then I will be in state district court in Austin asking that the court declare the Venue Statute for Defamation unconstitutional because it denies defendants a fair trial.  It is a mandatory venue rule so the judge cannot rule the forum is inconvenient because all of the players reside in Cameron County.

The US Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly you have a right to a fair trial in  the proper forum.  This is not possible in Texas.  This mandatory venue statute allow millionaires to chose a forum 9 hours away from where the event happened and all the witnesses are located which in effect make defense of the lawsuit impossible for some people.

The Travis County District Court will order the confidential settlement documents with McHale and Gutierrez released for review by the court.  They will see the abuse of the Tarrant County District Court judge in refusing to set my motion to dismiss for hearing.  They will see Mike's lawyers lies to the court of appeals and the suborning of Mike's perjury in misleading the court.

I personally believe the state will not fight this and will speak to Mike's abuse of the law for intimidation purposes.  This will only increase the sanctions.  But I tell you Mike can be sanctioned a billion dollars and still will not stop.  He refuses defeat and believes his millions put him above the  law.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT MONEY

I know settlement is not an option.  Mike will only agree to settlement if I agree to never write about him again - never going to happen - ever.  Thais is about a court order showing Mike can be defeated so the people in Cameron County will no longer fear being sued for speaking the truth about Mike Hernandez.

SHOPPING ON AMAZON IS CHEAPER IS A MYTH

Yes, as an informed consumer I do shop on Amazon sometimes, but I am informed.  Bela's birthday present is a good example.  The Dream Tent she wants on Amazon is $29.95.  Target has it in store for $19.95, but if they run out I can buy it on line and have it delivered to the store for $19.95.

I have always said if I am going to eat out, I prefer a family owned restaurant with good food because you are supporting a local family and not some corporation.  Sometimes you cannot avoid eating in a corporate restaurant.  Because I no longer eat corn tortillas, well for now, I rarely eat out Mexican.  But we now have a lot of very good Mexican food restaurants with good Mexican food, and their TexMex, which I think is funny, is terrible.  A good Mexican ranch restaurant does not have rice.  They have only what can be grown on the ranch.  I like these restaurants because they have a lot of fruits and vegetables, along with various meat dishes which are not fajitas.

JCP - does have a good internet shopping program which beats Amazon, especially if you have a United Mileage card.  I go in through the United program and typically get 3-5 frequent flyer miles for every dollar spent versus going to the store for one mile.  They have free pick up at the store.  

JCP stock was trading at about $10 a share in January. It closed today at $3.39.  It is not getting better.  It may go up a bit, but by weeks end be down from the previous week.

I buy all cotton clothes on line a lot cheaper than I would pay at Amazon, get my frequent flyer points, while using online coupons.  By shopping the mall stores on line for store pick up I am protecting the mall.  I am not a mall person.  But a good deal is a good deal.

Guys, check the pricing with coupons on line for the box stores we have locally in the mall or elsewhere before you shop Amazon.  You may say you do not care but you will if JCP, Sears or Dillards go under and the mall fails.  

This will mean a lower tax base which will mean tax increase to make up for the lost revenue.  Also, these local stores employ our neighbors.  

MY POINT IS DO NOT ASSUME SHOPPING ON LINE THROUGH AMAZON OR OTHER ONLINE VENDORS IS CHEAPER THAN THE BIG BOX STORES HERE IN BROWNSVILLE

Amazon so many times does not even compete price wise with what I buy on line from local stores.  This is protecting Brownsville jobs, taxes, and saving money.

The same goes for family restaurants.  They support local families.  If JCP or anyone else fails because we will not even compare prices while using coupons, then Brownsville's economy will be hurt big time, while leaving our neighbors without a job.  But in the end, my experience shopping on line at the big box stores which are local, is cheaper than Amazon.  Save money and Brownsville and shop Brownsville.

Monday, October 16, 2017


IF MIKE HERNANDEZ WILL LIE UNDER OATH TO A COURT, WHY WOULD HE NOT LIE ABOUT A LIST OF NAMES ON A PETITION WHICH HE KNOWS NO ONE CAN AUTHENTICATE?


To Duardo Paz-Martinez Today at 10:43 AM
That is a complete falsehood. I spoke with him in the phone during the Port elections and all of a sudden he literally goes off crying about his dying veteran brother and how he could not afford his cancer treatments. After literally 10 minutes I simply asked him, “how much does he need to stay alive?” which I assumed was the reason for his conduct. Then he flips a switch the next day and posts that I was trying to pay him off to endorse a candidate, which never came out of my mouth. That’s when I texted him that I would not deal with him anymore and I haven’t. When he saw that I was talking to you, he then contacted (Jose Angel) Gutierrez in an attempt to get back in contact with me. That is not going to happen.
Thanks again.
Mike
The falsehood Mike references is my claim way back months earlier he offered me money to endorse his candidates for the port.  Why did he take so many months to deny it?
KEY - On November 17, 2016, Mike by his own words stated he told Jose Angel Gutierrez he would not have contact with me.  In fact I posted how he blocked my email which is why I went to Jose Angel.
In May 2017, under oath Mike Hernandez said the following:

In paragraph 8 he says, says he never received a communication from me in December 2016, prior to me posting the comments he finds offensive.  In paragraph 13 he says before posting the offending comments in December 2016, I made no attempt to contact him.

Here is the problem by his own admission on November 17, I tried to open the lines of communication and by Mike's own words he said that was not going to happen.  So if in November 2016, Mike is making clear he will not open the lines of communication even through third parties like Jose Angel Gutierrez, than how did I refuse to communicate with him in December?
He lied to the court under oath about what was happening.  It is clearly sanctionable.  It was clearly deceptive and misleading to the court.  Only the court can decide if it was perjury or felony perjury.  But it will be addressed.
Finally, long before this lying email to the typing monkey the BV had posted many pictures of my brother who was then 79, and if nothing else would have been on medicare, which means he would have had medical coverage for his non-existent cancer. In fact he is on Tricare which means he has 100% medical coverage. If he is willing to lie to a court of law under oath, and attack a disabled veteran who did two tours in Vietnam, are you saying he would not lie about the list of signatories in his racist ad?